Java IoT Authors: Zakia Bouachraoui, Yeshim Deniz, Liz McMillan, Elizabeth White, William Schmarzo

Related Topics: Linux Containers

Linux Containers: Article

OSDL and Desktop Linux - Hype Meets Reality

State of the Linux Desktop

Linux has come a long way, quite quickly over the past couple of years. It has moved from a system usable only by those willing and able to spend time installing, configuring, and re-configuring again to systems that are sold by a wide variety of distributors, some of which have specialized desktop distributions. The list includes distributions such as Red Hat, Novell, Mandrake, Debian, and several others for specific geographies. They all install about as easily as any other OS that doesn't come pre-installed from a machine maker.

The Linux system (kernel plus utilities) has proven itself to be reliable enough and powerful enough to take over many of the data center functions previously run on proprietary Unix systems, as well as some part of the standards-based services running on Microsoft Windows servers. Where the Linux system is meeting resistance is as a general-purpose desktop system. This article looks at some of the reasons why this is the case, where Linux is currently a good fit, and where it still has progress to make. This article also takes a quick look at where the desktop may be going in the coming years.

The OSDL Desktop Working Group (DTL) is looking at ways to accelerate the adoption of Linux on the desktop. Exactly how, and the current state of its progress is discussed.

Home versus Enterprise
At first glance, a typical desktop from just about any Linux distribution would appear to offer most of the functionality needed on the client, and for some applications, indeed it does. For example, for a home user, the tools are available for browsing the Internet, exchanging e-mail, managing finances, creating and managing a variety of documents and work well. Even game playing is becoming better developed - although no one will claim that this particular area doesn't have a way to go yet.

Probably the biggest inconvenience of desktop Linux for home users is support for Microsoft proprietary and other IP-encumbered multimedia formats. In many cases, Linux distributors address this problem by shipping non-Open Source components to support these file formats.

In the enterprise, although the same (or at least very similar) requirements exist, there are additional complexities that make the rapid and widespread adoption of the Linux desktop, in its current state, much more difficult. Much depends on the specific desktop area being targeted. Some areas are much easier than others. For example, for software developers, as well as a number of other technical workstation users, the adoption of a Linux desktop poses few problems. This is particularly true when the move is from a Unix desktop to a Linux desktop.

The primary issue is scalability when it comes to large, enterprise-wide deployments involving potentially thousands of users. A small problem that can be surmounted by a single user becomes insurmountable when magnified to a larger scale. Where deploying Linux desktops as they exist today becomes problematic for the enterprise are principally:

  • Integrating with existing authentication and authorization systems. For example, Active Directory deployments. Enterprises want a single repository for this information.
  • File fidelity when transferring documents back and forth between systems. OpenOffice compatibility with Microsoft Word is good, but it isn't 100%, and multiple round trips between systems can result in lost or changed information.
  • Reliance on extensions of basic tools, especially Office tools with macros, VBscript, etc. embedded in them. In many organizations this reliance on vendor-specific extensions is a major inhibitor to change.
  • Centralized administration of systems and applications. The manageability of desktop systems is very important in most enterprise environments. This extends from basic system configuration changes to installing and configuring applications, and centralizing that configuration information. Most organizations want to continue to use the processes and tools they currently use rather than adopt an entirely new set.
  • Lack of enterprise-specific applications, perhaps the most obvious example being a centralized calendaring system that lets members of the organization view and interact with each other's calendars.
  • Availability of third-party applications. Many of the major building blocks of systems deployed in the enterprise are available in one form or another, but there is a widespread reliance on a plethora of lesser applications for which open source replacements do not exist. Unfortunately, this gap is unlikely to be filled by Open Source development because many of the apps in question are, well, to be blunt, boring, and hold no real challenge or interest for typical Open Source developers. A number of others are highly specialized, requiring a large investment to replicate, and still others are encumbered with various IP restrictions. A number of other issues face independent software vendors (ISVs) when they begin to look at the Linux desktop market:
    - Binary compatibility/stability. A binary built on a specific version of any given Linux distribution may not work on other versions of that same distribution, or on any given version of a competing distribution. ISVs are very reluctant to make the investment in thorough testing on multiple distributions/versions, and even less so to support different versions of their products on multiple distributions/versions.
    - Lack of a good widely known Integrated Development Environment (IDE) impacts the productivity of engineers, who are already at a disadvantage in moving to a new environment (Linux) from their preferred environment (Windows).
    - Multiple desktop environments. Having two desktop environments commonly in use and the fact that the technologies underlying each of them are different and incompatible is a big problem for ISVs. Just how big depends on what facilities the application needs. For example, the system used to notify applications of "events" that are of interest to them is different and incompatible between Gnome and KDE. This results in poor integration of an application when run under a windowing system other than the one it was written for. Reliance on run-time support from an alternative desktop system also means that much of that desktop system needs to be installed for the application to operate at all.
The combination of these problems often leads organizations that consider deploying Linux desktops in existing environments to reconsider, often abandoning the idea, or limiting the deployment to a few isolated uses.

These problems, in general, don't exist for a newly established organization, of course, unless there's a lot of interaction required with other organizations with alternative infrastructures.

The Future of Desktops
There's currently considerable debate about the future of the monolithic general-purpose desktop system. In the enterprise and among ISVs there's a tendency to view the future as having most applications hosted on centralized servers, and having very little, if any, logic hosted on thin desktop clients. This architecture has many advantages in terms of maintainability, reliability, availability, and controllability.

The biggest disadvantage to centralizing applications and their data in this way is that disconnected use (laptops) becomes more difficult. However, with high-speed connectivity becoming more prevalent, even in aircraft, disconnected use is slowly becoming less of an issue. In developing countries, there's little or no legacy network infrastructure, so wireless and fiber-based high-speed connectivity is on track to ubiquity.

More Stories By Philip Peake

Philip Peake is a professional services consultant, and has worked for a variety of companies including Netscape, AOL, Sun Microsystems and OSDL.
With over 25 years experience of UNIX based systems in Internet and
Intranet enterprise environments, using Linux has been a natural evolution.
Philip has a Batchelor of Science degree in computer science from
the University of Keele in the United Kingdom.

Comments (0)

Share your thoughts on this story.

Add your comment
You must be signed in to add a comment. Sign-in | Register

In accordance with our Comment Policy, we encourage comments that are on topic, relevant and to-the-point. We will remove comments that include profanity, personal attacks, racial slurs, threats of violence, or other inappropriate material that violates our Terms and Conditions, and will block users who make repeated violations. We ask all readers to expect diversity of opinion and to treat one another with dignity and respect.

IoT & Smart Cities Stories
Dynatrace is an application performance management software company with products for the information technology departments and digital business owners of medium and large businesses. Building the Future of Monitoring with Artificial Intelligence. Today we can collect lots and lots of performance data. We build beautiful dashboards and even have fancy query languages to access and transform the data. Still performance data is a secret language only a couple of people understand. The more busine...
Bill Schmarzo, author of "Big Data: Understanding How Data Powers Big Business" and "Big Data MBA: Driving Business Strategies with Data Science," is responsible for setting the strategy and defining the Big Data service offerings and capabilities for EMC Global Services Big Data Practice. As the CTO for the Big Data Practice, he is responsible for working with organizations to help them identify where and how to start their big data journeys. He's written several white papers, is an avid blogge...
Nicolas Fierro is CEO of MIMIR Blockchain Solutions. He is a programmer, technologist, and operations dev who has worked with Ethereum and blockchain since 2014. His knowledge in blockchain dates to when he performed dev ops services to the Ethereum Foundation as one the privileged few developers to work with the original core team in Switzerland.
René Bostic is the Technical VP of the IBM Cloud Unit in North America. Enjoying her career with IBM during the modern millennial technological era, she is an expert in cloud computing, DevOps and emerging cloud technologies such as Blockchain. Her strengths and core competencies include a proven record of accomplishments in consensus building at all levels to assess, plan, and implement enterprise and cloud computing solutions. René is a member of the Society of Women Engineers (SWE) and a m...
Andrew Keys is Co-Founder of ConsenSys Enterprise. He comes to ConsenSys Enterprise with capital markets, technology and entrepreneurial experience. Previously, he worked for UBS investment bank in equities analysis. Later, he was responsible for the creation and distribution of life settlement products to hedge funds and investment banks. After, he co-founded a revenue cycle management company where he learned about Bitcoin and eventually Ethereal. Andrew's role at ConsenSys Enterprise is a mul...
In his general session at 19th Cloud Expo, Manish Dixit, VP of Product and Engineering at Dice, discussed how Dice leverages data insights and tools to help both tech professionals and recruiters better understand how skills relate to each other and which skills are in high demand using interactive visualizations and salary indicator tools to maximize earning potential. Manish Dixit is VP of Product and Engineering at Dice. As the leader of the Product, Engineering and Data Sciences team at D...
Whenever a new technology hits the high points of hype, everyone starts talking about it like it will solve all their business problems. Blockchain is one of those technologies. According to Gartner's latest report on the hype cycle of emerging technologies, blockchain has just passed the peak of their hype cycle curve. If you read the news articles about it, one would think it has taken over the technology world. No disruptive technology is without its challenges and potential impediments t...
If a machine can invent, does this mean the end of the patent system as we know it? The patent system, both in the US and Europe, allows companies to protect their inventions and helps foster innovation. However, Artificial Intelligence (AI) could be set to disrupt the patent system as we know it. This talk will examine how AI may change the patent landscape in the years to come. Furthermore, ways in which companies can best protect their AI related inventions will be examined from both a US and...
Bill Schmarzo, Tech Chair of "Big Data | Analytics" of upcoming CloudEXPO | DXWorldEXPO New York (November 12-13, 2018, New York City) today announced the outline and schedule of the track. "The track has been designed in experience/degree order," said Schmarzo. "So, that folks who attend the entire track can leave the conference with some of the skills necessary to get their work done when they get back to their offices. It actually ties back to some work that I'm doing at the University of San...
When talking IoT we often focus on the devices, the sensors, the hardware itself. The new smart appliances, the new smart or self-driving cars (which are amalgamations of many ‘things'). When we are looking at the world of IoT, we should take a step back, look at the big picture. What value are these devices providing. IoT is not about the devices, its about the data consumed and generated. The devices are tools, mechanisms, conduits. This paper discusses the considerations when dealing with the...