| By Don MacVittie | Article Rating: |
|
| July 10, 2009 11:15 AM EDT | Reads: |
3,412 |
I was pondering over the weekend the concept that a SAN is relatively easy to manage – at least on the surface – because it is, in essence, a network in and of itself. Separated from the IP network, you have a switch that connects various SAN arrays and when your arrays become over-burdened, you can just drop another one in and plug it into the switch. Easy. And since the switch is not generally from the same vendor as the storage array, you can plug in whatever array you find most appealing this week. Migrating data between arrays can be tricky, but these days there are solutions for that. Initialization can be painful, particularly if you want to add it to an existing pool and distribute data across it like it had always been there or you’re using at-rest encryption, but that’s just time you have to wait while it runs, your staff isn’t required unless something goes wrong.
Whither the same type of adaptability and expandability in the NAS space? That’s where devices like our ARX come in. It sits between your machine and your storage, it cares not how much or what brand of storage sits behind it (in fact, at least for ARX, you can even point it at random shares on your Windows servers if you feel the need), and it allows you to just plug in more disk space and manage it centrally. You have the same issues with initial config that you would otherwise have, but the box is then part of the File Virtualization product’s virtual directory, and can be accessed, moved about, whatever.
This is the part where NAS vendors start to huff and puff and talk about their astounding management and integration, and how easy it is to add storage to the system, etc. etc. etc. And they are 100% right. Modern NAS systems are astounding in their versatility and ease of management. As long as they’re homogeneous systems. Throw another vendor on the network and ask the same questions again. You’ll get a set of answers that makes it clear these tools are only for their products.
And that’s one of the many many reasons why a high-quality File (NAS) Virtualization product is more than a little useful. They generally don’t cater to one vendor, they give you all the things you have if you are a single-source shop, but you can apply it to whatever NAS – or even Windows Shared – storage you have in the house. Simplified management, ease of data movement when necessary, you name it. All across whatever hardware you happen to have today or will have in the future.
And to me, that’s a very cool thing.
Don
Read the original blog entry...
Published July 10, 2009 Reads 3,412
Copyright © 2009 SYS-CON Media, Inc. — All Rights Reserved.
Syndicated stories and blog feeds, all rights reserved by the author.
More Stories By Don MacVittie
Don MacVittie is a Technical Marketing Manager at F5 Networks. In this role, he supports outbound marketing, education, and evangelism efforts around development, storage, and IT management topics related to F5 solutions. His role includes authoring technical materials, participating in social and community-based forums, and providing guidance for the development of marketing resources. As an industry veteran, MacVittie has extensive programming experience along with project management, IT management, and systems/network administration expertise.
Prior to joining F5, MacVittie was a Senior Technology Editor at Network Computing, where he conducted product research and evaluated storage and server systems, as well as development and outsourcing solutions. He has authored numerous articles on a variety of topics aimed at IT professionals. MacVittie holds a B.S. in Computer Science from Northern Michigan University, and an M.S. in Computer Science from Nova Southeastern University.
- Patterns for Building High Performance Applications
- It's the Java vs. C++ Shootout Revisited!
- Asynchronous Logging Using Spring
- Java for Programmers (2nd Edition)
- Cross-Platform Mobile Website Development – a Tool Comparison
- Three Buzzwords That Every CIO Hears but One They Should Listen To
- Write Once Run Anywhere or Cross Platform Mobile Development Tools
- Immersing into JavaScript Frameworks
- Workday Reportedly Prepping to Go Public
- Cloud Expo New York: The Java EE 7 Platform - Developing for the Cloud
- Book Review: Sams Teach Yourself Java in 24 Hours
- OpenOffice.com Lives
- Book Excerpt: Introducing HTML5
- Adobe Sends Flex to the Apache Foundation
- Five Years Waiting for JRE 7: Is It Justified? (Part 1)
- Book Excerpt: Java Application Profiling Tips and Tricks
- i-Technology in 2012: Five Industry Predictions
- Patterns for Building High Performance Applications
- It's the Java vs. C++ Shootout Revisited!
- OpenXava 4.3: Rapid Java Web Development
- The Next Web Architecture
- Asynchronous Logging Using Spring
- Java for Programmers (2nd Edition)
- Is Write Once Run Anywhere Ever Going to Be a Reality?
- A Cup of AJAX? Nay, Just Regular Java Please
- Java Developer's Journal Exclusive: 2006 "JDJ Editors' Choice" Awards
- JavaServer Faces (JSF) vs Struts
- The i-Technology Right Stuff
- Rich Internet Applications with Adobe Flex 2 and Java
- Java vs C++ "Shootout" Revisited
- Bean-Managed Persistence Using a Proxy List
- Reporting Made Easy with JasperReports and Hibernate
- Creating a Pet Store Application with JavaServer Faces, Spring, and Hibernate
- Why Do 'Cool Kids' Choose Ruby or PHP to Build Websites Instead of Java?
- What's New in Eclipse?
- i-Technology Predictions for 2007: Where's It All Headed?






















