| By Mary Ellen Power | Article Rating: |
|
| December 7, 2011 10:12 AM EST | Reads: |
1,136 |
SPeRS 2.0 was released this week at the Electronic Signatures and Records Association (ESRA) annual meeting. SPeRS, the Standards & Procedures for Electronic Records and Signatures, provides a series of guidelines on how to implement electronic signatures and electronic transactions in general.
The SPeRS 2.0 update focuses primarily on government regulatory developments and changes affecting e-records and e-disclosures that have surfaced over the past eight years since the first version was released. This has become especially important as transactions for services such as banking, insurance, investment and health are happening more frequently on the web and regulatory changes are being made to keep pace with new technologies such as social networking, mobile devices and cloud computing. This update to SPeRS becomes critical to enable organizations to create reliable, secure and enforceable electronic transactions using a process approach such as Silanis’ e-signature process management.
At Silanis, we’ve seen the SPeRS guidelines benefit organizations of all sizes, especially as part of the acquisition or RFP process. First, it is used to evaluate and clarify their own electronic signature process management needs as they prepare to transfer their paper-based processes online. And second, to help determine whether a particular vendor or solution meets their requirements. As a drafting committee member of SPeRS and a contributor to the standards, Silanis’ solutions naturally comply with the guidelines.
SPeRS has also been leveraged by industry associations as a basis for electronic signature standards applying to more specific industry use cases and processes. Examples include the IRI (Insured Retirement Institute) and the MBA (Mortgage Bankers Association). Still, many other industry associations seem to be struggling with the issue of how to promote and standardize the use of electronic signatures. While each industry has its own unique processes, the SPeRS standard is a model that can and should be leveraged across all industries.
SPeRS is a comprehensive guideline that addresses authentication & authority; consent to use electronic records and signatures; agreements, notices and disclosures; electronic-signatures; and records retention. And while the standard was drafted for Financial Services, the overall SPeRS guidelines can be quite useful to organizations in any industry – in my opinion, SPeRS would be a valuable resource for any business seeking to enable straight through processing.
This is especially true for organizations struggling to implement electronic transactions in compliance with the US Federal ESIGN law and the state UETA laws. While these laws are helpful from a legislative point of view (they establish that electronic signatures and electronic records are equivalent to their paper counterparts), they are technology-neutral and do not specify how to best meet the requirements outlined in laws and regulations covered by ESIGN and UETA. That’s where SPeRS steps in.
Published December 7, 2011 Reads 1,136
Copyright © 2011 SYS-CON Media, Inc. — All Rights Reserved.
Syndicated stories and blog feeds, all rights reserved by the author.
More Stories By Mary Ellen Power
Mary Ellen Power is Vice-President of Marketing at Silanis Technology, a leading provider of electronic signature solutions. Ms. Power has led Silanis' customer relations and industry marketing efforts since 2000 where she has had the opportunity to engage with some of the world's largest insurance carriers, financial service providers, government organizations and analyst firms. Over the years Ms. Power has acquired in-depth knowledge of the electronic signature market and its impact in real-world customer deployments.
- Agile Adoption – Crossing the Chasm
- Cloud Expo New York: The Java EE 7 Platform - Developing for the Cloud
- Write Once Run Anywhere or Cross Platform Mobile Development Tools
- Cross-Platform Mobile Website Development – a Tool Comparison
- Architecture Governance – the TOGAF Way
- Twelve New Programming Languages: Is Cloud Responsible?
- It's the Java vs. C++ Shootout Revisited!
- Cloud Expo New York Speaker Profile: Arun Gupta – Oracle
- Agile Development & Enterprise Architecture Practice – Can They Coexist?
- Cloud Expo New York: Industry-Leading CxOs to Present June 11-14
- Component Development and Assembly Using OSGi Services
- Big Data: Information Spawns Innovation
- Agile Adoption – Crossing the Chasm
- Graal, a Dynamic Java Compiler in the Works
- Cloud Expo New York: The Java EE 7 Platform - Developing for the Cloud
- Write Once Run Anywhere or Cross Platform Mobile Development Tools
- Cross-Platform Mobile Website Development – a Tool Comparison
- Architecture Governance – the TOGAF Way
- Google Analytics with Monitis Dashboard
- Twelve New Programming Languages: Is Cloud Responsible?
- It's the Java vs. C++ Shootout Revisited!
- Cloud Expo New York Speaker Profile: Arun Gupta – Oracle
- Scaling Java and JSP Apps with Distributed Caching
- Agile Development & Enterprise Architecture Practice – Can They Coexist?
- A Cup of AJAX? Nay, Just Regular Java Please
- Java Developer's Journal Exclusive: 2006 "JDJ Editors' Choice" Awards
- JavaServer Faces (JSF) vs Struts
- The i-Technology Right Stuff
- Rich Internet Applications with Adobe Flex 2 and Java
- Java vs C++ "Shootout" Revisited
- Bean-Managed Persistence Using a Proxy List
- Reporting Made Easy with JasperReports and Hibernate
- Creating a Pet Store Application with JavaServer Faces, Spring, and Hibernate
- Why Do 'Cool Kids' Choose Ruby or PHP to Build Websites Instead of Java?
- What's New in Eclipse?
- i-Technology Predictions for 2007: Where's It All Headed?

















