| By James Carlini | Article Rating: |
|
| February 22, 2012 10:35 AM EST | Reads: |
1,720 |
When it comes to procurement, any technology or service should be evaluated with a good set of criteria. Executive decisions should not be weighted solely on a single selection criterion such as price. This applies to any cloud computing service as well.
The twelve criteria listed below (see Chart 1) forces executives to take a broader review of the many elements of the total cloud computing service, and not just price. Each criteria starts with an R, F, or P which makes it easy to remember the total framework for the Yardstick for Technology Procurement (RFP).
Chart 1: Yardstick for Technology Procurement (RFP)
|
RELIABILITY |
At what percentage of reliability is the service? 99.9% 99.99? 99.995? How is this measured? What costs are associated with increasing reliability? (Cost/Benefit Analysis) |
|
REDUNDANCY |
Can the system survive a major disaster or is there a single point-of-failure? Does the vendor have a system that can handle mission-critical applications or is that better left off the cloud? |
|
REDUCED OPERATING COSTS |
Every system is going to proclaim they save operating expenses. Is there a significant difference between vendors' products? |
|
FLEXIBILITY |
How flexible is the basic platform to accommodate changes and/or additions to the initial applications? |
|
FUNCTIONALITY |
What does the cloud provide as to capabilities? Are these functionalities easily adaptable to changes in the business? |
|
FAMILIARITY |
Every system is sold as "user-friendly" so that is not a good criterion to use. Familiarity is a better term to understand how the average user navigates into the cloud and is comfortable with utilizing the applications. |
|
PERFORMANCE |
Most systems are talking about performance in areas of scalability, elasticity, and other criteria, are there any unique performance capabilities tied to one vendor or vendors? |
|
PRICING |
Price is still a consideration in any purchase, but now is only a part of the evaluation criteria instead of being 95% of the decision. |
|
PERSONNEL |
Which people will the user still need to have on premise? A liaison person? A systems administrator? An SLA administrator? Any other resources? |
|
RESOURCES |
Are all resources off-site or are there requirements that might include on-site physical resources? What are they? |
|
REALITIES |
What can be done with the cloud and what cannot be done? This sounds like a simple question yet many do not seek the answer to this and immediately look at the cloud as a "universal solution" to all their computing issues. |
|
RISKS |
What are the risks in going to a third party instead of keeping an application in-house? What about Intellectual Property or proprietary applications being put into the hands of a third party? |
Source: James Carlini
There are many other questions to ask under each of the R, F, and P categories. This opens up discussions as to what's internally important to your enterprise and not what was important to the organization down the street that just installed a cloud application in their environment.
If you go through the review process using this twelve-step assessment tool, your selection will be much more well defined and "price" will still be a factor, but not the only factor in your decision.
Be Selective
Some say computing will become a utility, I disagree. Many organizations have proprietary applications that are so intertwined with their core business, they cannot pull them out and give them to a third party to operate. An example is the Chicago Mercantile Exchange and their trading platform. Would they really want to give their electronic trading platform, a mission-critical application that is part of their strategic competitive advantage out to a third party to manage?
If an application within your enterprise qualifies as a candidate for cloud computing, you should ensure the right service is selected by using all the criteria that has been mentioned and not just price.
This yardstick's focus on selection criteria has been used for clients throughout the years as well as integrated into the Executive Masters courses I taught at Northwestern University.
• • •
Copyright 2012 - James Carlini
Published February 22, 2012 Reads 1,720
Copyright © 2012 SYS-CON Media, Inc. — All Rights Reserved.
Syndicated stories and blog feeds, all rights reserved by the author.
More Stories By James Carlini
James Carlini, MBA, a certified Infrastructure Consultant, keynote speaker and former award-winning Adjunct Professor at Northwestern University, has advised on mission-critical networks. Clients include the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, GLOBEX, and City of Chicago’s 911 Center. An expert witness in civil and federal courts on network infrastructure, he has worked with AT&T, Sprint and others.
Follow daily Carlini-isms at www.twitter.com/JAMESCARLINI
- Three Tips to Successfully Load Test Adobe Flex Applications
- Patterns for Building High Performance Applications
- It's the Java vs. C++ Shootout Revisited!
- Asynchronous Logging Using Spring
- Graal, a Dynamic Java Compiler in the Works
- Cross-Platform Mobile Website Development – a Tool Comparison
- Write Once Run Anywhere or Cross Platform Mobile Development Tools
- Three Buzzwords That Every CIO Hears but One They Should Listen To
- Cloud Expo New York: The Java EE 7 Platform - Developing for the Cloud
- Immersing into JavaScript Frameworks
- Workday Reportedly Prepping to Go Public
- Book Review: Sams Teach Yourself Java in 24 Hours
- Three Tips to Successfully Load Test Adobe Flex Applications
- Book Excerpt: Introducing HTML5
- Five Years Waiting for JRE 7: Is It Justified? (Part 1)
- Book Excerpt: Java Application Profiling Tips and Tricks
- i-Technology in 2012: Five Industry Predictions
- Patterns for Building High Performance Applications
- It's the Java vs. C++ Shootout Revisited!
- OpenXava 4.3: Rapid Java Web Development
- The Next Web Architecture
- Asynchronous Logging Using Spring
- Java for Programmers (2nd Edition)
- Graal, a Dynamic Java Compiler in the Works
- A Cup of AJAX? Nay, Just Regular Java Please
- Java Developer's Journal Exclusive: 2006 "JDJ Editors' Choice" Awards
- JavaServer Faces (JSF) vs Struts
- The i-Technology Right Stuff
- Rich Internet Applications with Adobe Flex 2 and Java
- Java vs C++ "Shootout" Revisited
- Bean-Managed Persistence Using a Proxy List
- Reporting Made Easy with JasperReports and Hibernate
- Creating a Pet Store Application with JavaServer Faces, Spring, and Hibernate
- Why Do 'Cool Kids' Choose Ruby or PHP to Build Websites Instead of Java?
- What's New in Eclipse?
- i-Technology Predictions for 2007: Where's It All Headed?

















