Welcome!

Java Authors: Pat Romanski, Carmen Gonzalez, Victoria Livschitz, Liz McMillan, Elizabeth White

News Feed Item

Wireless Security Market in LTE Networks 2013-2018

NEW YORK, Jan. 8, 2013 /PRNewswire/ -- Reportlinker.com announces that a new market research report is available in its catalogue:

Wireless Security Market in LTE Networks 2013-2018

http://www.reportlinker.com/p01080584/Wireless-Security-Market-in-LTE-Ne...

Overview:

With the rapid expansion of broadband wireless, end-users increasingly rely upon handheld devices for almost all daily living activities. Fourth generation (4G) cellular LTE in particular represents a unique opportunity/challenge as device attacks are growing at a rapid rate, exposing vulnerabilities that must be addressed. Our research indicates that Android malware in particular will grow rapidly and will be considered most vulnerable OS for LTE.

This research is most reading for anyone involved in LTE network planning, device procurement, and/or application development and management. This report includes extensive LTE Security Market forecasting for the period 2013 - 2018. The report complements Mind Commerce research in LTE device, subscriptions, and application market analysis as well as security threats for specific applications such as mobile games.

Companies in Report:

Apple, Samsung Asus, Motorola, Kaspersky, AVG, McAffee, F-secure, Trojon, Verizon Wireless ,NTT DocoMo, AT & T Mobility USA ,Metro PCS ,Vodafone D2 EMOBILE NTT DOCOMO SoftBank Mobile,KDDIVodafone,3(Hutchison),O2(Telefonica)Everything Everywhere, Zain,Nawras, Omantel, Mobily, Saudi Telecom Company (STC),Zain, du Etisalat, Movicel, Orange Mauritius, MTC Namibia, Vodacom, China Mobile Hong Kong,CSL, PCCW, Smartone, Aircel, Airtel, Augere, Qualcomm, Tikona, Megafon, MTS, Yota Target Audience:

LTE device manufacturers

Mobile network operators

LTE infrastructure providers

Cellular application developers

Managed communications providers

Table of Contents:

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 8

2.0 INTRODUCTION 9

3.0 WIRELESS SECURITY IN LTE 10

3.1 WHY WIRELESS SECURITY IS DIFFERENT IN LTE 10

3.2 LTE AND MOBILE WIMAX TECHNICAL COMPARISON 11

3.3 WIRELESS SECURITY VULNERABILITY : A BURNING ISSUE FOR MOBILE DEVICES 11

3.3.1 CORRELATED RISK IN LTE: 12

3.4 SMARTPHONE & TABLET DEVICE: NEW CHOICE OF ATTACKER 12

3.4.1 ANDROID MALWARE SAMPLES: 12

3.5 3GPP/LTE SECURITY STANDARDIZATION SPECIFICATIONS: 3GPP NDS 14

3.6 DNS IN WIRELESS SECURITY 15

4.0 MOBILE SECURITY IN IP ENVIRONMENT: LTE PATTERN 164.1 TRENDS OF MOBILE SECURITY THREATS 164.1.1 WIRELESS MOBILE DEVICE ADVANCEMENT 164.1.2 INCREASING NUMBER OF MALICIOUS APPLICATION 164.1.3 ANDROID'S POPULARITY 164.1.4 ADAPTION OF MOBILE DEVICE IN CORPORATE AREA 164.1.5 LACK OF AWARENESS AMONG SUBSCRIBER 164.2 RAN & BACKHAUL AS MEANS FOR STRONGER SECURITY 174.3 CORE NETWORK THREATS 184.4 DIAMETER SIGNALLING DERIVED THREAT: 194.5 THIRD PARTY SOURCED THREAT 204.5.1 ROAMING PARTNERS: 204.5.2 MVNO 214.5.3 INFRASTRUCTURE 214.5.4 ENTERPRISE NETWORK 224.6 IWLAN SECURITY 224.7 SMALL CELL SECURITY 224.8 RCS (RICH COMMUNICATION SERVICES) SECURITY 23FIGURE 10: RCS (RICH COMMUNICATION SERVICES) SECURITY ARCHITECTURE (COPYRIGHT: RADISYS) 23

5.0 WIRELESS SECURITY ANALYSIS ON LTE PATTERN 24

5.1 ANALYSIS OF WIRELESS LTE THREAT: 24

5.1.1 LTE APPLICATION USER FORECASTING 2013-2018* 24

5.1.2 CONSUMER AWARENESS OVER WIRELESS SECURITY 2013 - 2018 25

5.1.3 WORLDWIDE WIRELESS ANTIVIRUS USER 2013-2018* 25

5.2 OUTLOOK OF WIRELESS LTE THREAT: 26

6.0 WIRELESS SECURITY THREATS GATEWAY ON MOBILE DEVICE: LTE PATTERN 276.1 WIRELESS LTE CYBER THREAT LANDSCAPE: 276.2 WEB SECURITY THREAT 286.3 CATEGORY POSED THREAT 286.4 PLATFORM POSED THREAT 296.5 ANALYSIS OF ALL TYPES OF LTE THREAT 29

7.0 GRAPHICAL PRESENTATION OF WIRELESS SECURITY INCIDENT 30

7.1 WIRELESS INCIDENT BY THROUGH SOURCES 30

7.1.1 VOIP 30

7.1.2 MMS 30

7.1.3 MOBILE GAMING 31

7.1.4 MOBILE PAYMENT 31

7.1.5 MOBILE APPLICATION 32

7.2 REGION WISE LTE THREAT 32

7.2.1 VOIP THREAT 32

7.2.2 MMS THREAT: 33

7.2.3 GAMING THREAT: 33

7.2.4 MOBILE PAYMENT THREAT: 34

7.2.5 APPLICATION DOWNLOAD THREAT 34

8.0 LTE TAKING THE PLACE OF 3G 358.1 WORLDWIDE LTE USER ANALYSIS 358.1.1 LTE USER EXPANSION GLOBALLY 358.1.2 LTE USER REGION WISE: 368.2 WIRELESS SECURITY INCIDENT BY SOURCE 368.3 WORLDWIDE MOBILE ANTIVIRUS USER 378.4 UPSHOT ON LTE USERS AND ITS FUTURE 37

9.0 WIRELESS SECURITY MEASURE DEPLOYMENT 38

9.1 COUNTRY WISE LTE SECURITY AWARENESS (2013-2018) 38

9.1.1 USA 38

9.1.2 UK 39

9.1.3 SOUTH KOREA 39

9.1.4 AFRICA 40

9.1.5 AUSTRALIA 40

9.1.6 BRAZIL 41

9.1.7 CANADA 41

9.1.8 BELGIUM 42

9.1.9 FRANCE 42

9.1.10 GERMANY 43

9.1.11 RUSSIA 43

9.1.12 MIDDLE EAST 44

9.1.13 JAPAN 44

9.1.14 CHINA 45

9.1.15 INDIA 45

9.2 COUNTRY WISE LTE NETWORK (WITH PRIVACY & SECURITY) PROVIDER MARKET SHARE 46

9.2.1 USA 46

9.2.2 UK 46

9.2.3 AFRICA 47

9.2.4 MIDDLE EAST 47

9.2.5 SOUTH KOREA 48

9.2.6 JAPAN 48

9.2.7 RUSSIA 49

9.2.8 BELGIUM 49

9.2.9 GERMANY 50

9.2.10 AUSTRALIA 50

9.2.11 HONGKONG 51

9.2.12 CHINA 51

9.2.13 INDIA 52

10.0 WIRELESS SECURITY VENDOR COMPANY ANALYSIS 5310.1 WORLDWIDE SECURITY VENDOR ANALYSIS 53

11.0 DISTINCTIVE INITIATIVE TO PREVENT WIRELESS INCIDENT 54

11.1 UNIQUE MOBILE SECURITY BY BRITISH FIRM 54

11.2 WIRELESS LTE THREAT IDENTIFICATION THROUGH PREVENTION APPLICATION 55

12.0 WIRELESS SECURITY MARKET PROJECTION 2013 - 2018 5612.1 REGION WISE % OF LTE DEPLOYMENT 2013 56FIGURE 63: REGION WISE % OF LTE DEPLOYMENT 2013 5612.2 VULNERABILITY %: SMARTPHONE VS. TABLET DEVICE 2013-2018 5612.3 REGION WISE MARKET VALUE PROJECTION 57FIGURE 65: REGION WISE SECURE LTE SUBSCRIBERS (IN MILLION) 2013-2018* 5712.4 WIRELESS SECURITY COMPANY MARKET SHARE 2013 5712.5 LTE INFRASTRUCTURE COMMERCIAL BY VENDORS 5812.6 LTE SUPPORTING TABLET & SMARTPHONE MANUFACTURERS 58FIGURE 68: LTE SUPPORTING TABLET & SMARTPHONE MANUFACTURERS 58

13.0 CASE ANALYSIS 59

13.1 THANKS GIVING: BIG DAY FOR HACKERS 59

13.1.1 INTRODUCTION: HACKERS TARGETING SHOPPERS' SMARTPHONES 59

13.1.2 HOW THE SMARTPHONE ATTACKED 59

13.1.3 RESEARCHERS OPINION AND CONCLUSION 60

13.2 WIRELESS THREAT IN CORPORATE ENVIRONMENT 60

13.2.1 INTRODUCTION 60

13.2.2 ATTACK IN CORPORATE ENVIRONMENT: 61

13.3 ONE SIMPLE TRICK COULD DISABLE A CITY'S LTE NETWORK 62

13.3.1 INTRODUCTION 62

13.3.2 FEMTOCELL IS A CONTRIBUTOR IN LTE ATTACK 62

13.4 HIGH SPEED LTE IS A SOURCE OF ATTACK FOR TERRORIST 62

13.4.1 INTRODUCTION 62

13.4.2 RESEARCHERS QUOTE ON "LTE AS A SOURCE OF TERRORIST ATTACK" 63

13.5 CYBERCRIMINAL'S NETWORK ON MOBILE PAYMENT 63

13.5.1 INTRODUCTION 63

13.6 MOBILE APPLICATION DOWNLOAD FOUNDATION OF VIRUS DOWNLOAD 65

13.6.1 INTRODUCTION 65

13.6.2 HOW THE VIRUS DOWNLOAD BY APPLICATION DOWNLOAD 65

13.7 MOBILE WIFI HACKING 66

13.8 GAME APPLICATION HACKED SMARTPHONE & TABLET 66

14.0 CONCLUSION & RECOMMENDATION 6714.1 CONCLUSION 6714.2 UPCOMING TOP 10 WIRELESS LTE SECURITY ISSUES IN 2013 6714.2.1 TARGETED ATTACKS 6714.2.2 MORE HACTIVISM 6814.2.3 CYBER ESPIONAGE & WARFARE 6814.2.4 BIG BROTHER WATCHING EVEN MORE 6814.2.5 INCREASE IN MALWARE 6814.2.6 PRIVACY RIGHTS ERODING 6914.2.7 CYBER EXTORTION 6914.2.8 APPLE UNDER ATTACK 6914.2.9 ANDROID, EVEN WORSE 6914.2.10 UN-PATCHED EXPLOITS IN JAVA 7014.3 RECOMMENDATION 7014.3.1 PROTECTING CORPORATE NETWORK 7014.4 RECOMMENDATION FOR MOBILE APPLICATION DEVELOPERS: 7314.5 IOS: RECOMMENDED SETTINGS FOR WI-FI ROUTERS AND ACCESS POINTS 7314.6 RECOMMENDED SECURITY FOR MOBILE PAYMENT 7414.6.1 DETECTING IF CARDHOLDER DATA IS BEING SKIMMED 7414.6.2 IDENTIFYING AND PROTECTING WLAN FROM UNAUTHORIZED DEVICES 7414.7 IP NETWORK SECURITY MEASURES: 74

Graphs

Figure 1:System Architecture of Wireless LTE 9

Figure 2: LTE and GPRS networks - Comparison between Equivalent Functionalities 10

Figure 3:Android Malware Samples 13

Figure 4: Model of NDS

Figure 5:Ran & Black-haul in LTE 17

Figure 6:Diameter Signaling Threat Structure 20

Figure 7:Structure of LTE roaming 21

Figure 8: IWLAN Security Architecture 22

Figure 9: Small Cell Security Architecture 23

Figure 10: Rich Communication Services (RCS) Security Architecture 23

Figure 11: LTE application usage rate 2013-2018 24

Figure 12: Consumer Awareness over Wireless Security 2013 - 2018 25

Figure 13: Worldwide Wireless Antivirus User 25

Figure 14: Wireless Security Landscape 27

Figure 15: LTE Web Security Threats 28

Figure 16: Category Posed Threats 28

Figure 17: Platform Posed LTE Threats 29

Figure 18: Worldwide VOIP Incidents 2013-2018 30

Figure 19: Worldwide MMS Incidents 2013-2018 30

Figure 20: Worldwide Mobile Gaming Incidents 2013-2018 31

Figure 21: Worldwide Mobile Payment Incidents 2013-2018 31

Figure 22: Worldwide Mobile Application Download Incident 2013-2018 32

Figure 23: Region-based VOIP incident 32

Figure 24: Region wise MMS incident 33

Figure 25: Region0based Mobile Gaming incident 33

Figure 26: Region-based Mobile Payment incident 34

Figure 27: Region-based Application Download Incident 34

Figure 28: LTE Global User Expansion 35

Figure 29:LTE Deployment Regionally 36

Figure 30: Wireless Security Incident by Source 2013-2018 37

Figure 31: Worldwide Mobile Antivirus Users by Region 2013-2018 37

Figure 32: USA:LTE Incident Awareness (2013-2018) 38

Figure 33: UK: LTE Incident Awareness (2013-2018) 39

Figure 34: South Korea: LTE Incident Awareness (2013-2018) 39

Figure 35: Africa: LTE Incident Awareness (2013-2018) 40

Figure 36: Australia: LTE Incident Awareness (2013-2018) 40

Figure 37: Brazil: LTE Incident Awareness (2013-2018) 41

Figure 38: Canada: LTE Incident Awareness (2013-2018) 41

Figure 39: Belgium: LTE Incident Awareness (2013-2018) 42

Figure 40: France: LTE Incident Awareness (2013-2018) 43

Figure 41: Germany: LTE Incident Awareness (2013-2018) 43

Figure 42: Russia: LTE Incident Awareness (2013-2018) 43

Figure 43: Middle East: Incident Awareness (2013-2018) 44

Figure 44: Japan: LTE Incident Awareness (2013-2018) 44

Figure 45: China: LTE Incident Awareness (2013-2018) 45

Figure 46: India: LTE Incident Awareness (2013-2018) 45

Figure 47: USA: LTE Service Providers 46

Figure 48: UK: LTE Service Providers 46

Figure 49: Africa: LTE Service Providers 47

Figure 50: Middle East: LTE Service Providers 47

Figure 51: South Korea: LTE Service Providers 48

Figure 52: Japan: LTE Service Providers 48

Figure 53: Russia: LTE Service Providers 49

Figure 54: Belgium: LTE Service Providers 49

Figure 55: Germany: LTE Service Providers 50

Figure 56: Australia: LTE Service Providers 50

Figure 57: Hong Kong: LTE Service Providers 51

Figure 58: China: LTE Service Providers 51

Figure 59: India :LTE Service Providers 52

Figure 60: Wireless Security Antivirus Global Market Share 2013-2018 53

Figure 61:Tie Mobile Security Model 54

Figure 62:LTE Threat Identification Application 55

Figure 63: Region-based % of LTE Deployment 2013 56

Figure 64: Vulnerability % Smartphone vs. Tablet Devices 2013-2018 56

Figure 65: Region-based Secure LTE Subscribers 2013-2018 57

Figure 66: Global Security Vendor Company Market share 2013 57

Figure 67: LTE Infrastructure Commercial by Vendors 2013-2018 58

Figure 68: LTE Supporting Tablet & Smartphone Manufacturers 58

Figure 69: Attacker Targeting Smartphones & Tablets 59

Figure 70:Wireless Threat in Corporate Environment 61

Figure 71:Mobile Payment Attack 64

Figure 72: Virus Spread through Application Downloads 65

Figure 73:Game Application on Smartphones 66

Tables

Table 1:Types of Wireless Attack 19To order this report:Security_Systems Industry: Wireless Security Market in LTE Networks 2013-2018

Contact
Nicolas Bombourg
Reportlinker
Email: [email protected]
US: (805)652-2626
Intl: +1 805-652-2626

 

SOURCE Reportlinker

More Stories By PR Newswire

Copyright © 2007 PR Newswire. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of PRNewswire content is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of PRNewswire. PRNewswire shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.

@ThingsExpo Stories
Cultural, regulatory, environmental, political and economic (CREPE) conditions over the past decade are creating cross-industry solution spaces that require processes and technologies from both the Internet of Things (IoT), and Data Management and Analytics (DMA). These solution spaces are evolving into Sensor Analytics Ecosystems (SAE) that represent significant new opportunities for organizations of all types. Public Utilities throughout the world, providing electricity, natural gas and water, are pursuing SmartGrid initiatives that represent one of the more mature examples of SAE. We have s...
The security devil is always in the details of the attack: the ones you've endured, the ones you prepare yourself to fend off, and the ones that, you fear, will catch you completely unaware and defenseless. The Internet of Things (IoT) is nothing if not an endless proliferation of details. It's the vision of a world in which continuous Internet connectivity and addressability is embedded into a growing range of human artifacts, into the natural world, and even into our smartphones, appliances, and physical persons. In the IoT vision, every new "thing" - sensor, actuator, data source, data con...
The Internet of Things is tied together with a thin strand that is known as time. Coincidentally, at the core of nearly all data analytics is a timestamp. When working with time series data there are a few core principles that everyone should consider, especially across datasets where time is the common boundary. In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, Jim Scott, Director of Enterprise Strategy & Architecture at MapR Technologies, discussed single-value, geo-spatial, and log time series data. By focusing on enterprise applications and the data center, he will use OpenTSDB as an example t...
How do APIs and IoT relate? The answer is not as simple as merely adding an API on top of a dumb device, but rather about understanding the architectural patterns for implementing an IoT fabric. There are typically two or three trends: Exposing the device to a management framework Exposing that management framework to a business centric logic Exposing that business layer and data to end users. This last trend is the IoT stack, which involves a new shift in the separation of what stuff happens, where data lives and where the interface lies. For instance, it's a mix of architectural styles ...
The 3rd International Internet of @ThingsExpo, co-located with the 16th International Cloud Expo - to be held June 9-11, 2015, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY - announces that its Call for Papers is now open. The Internet of Things (IoT) is the biggest idea since the creation of the Worldwide Web more than 20 years ago.
An entirely new security model is needed for the Internet of Things, or is it? Can we save some old and tested controls for this new and different environment? In his session at @ThingsExpo, New York's at the Javits Center, Davi Ottenheimer, EMC Senior Director of Trust, reviewed hands-on lessons with IoT devices and reveal a new risk balance you might not expect. Davi Ottenheimer, EMC Senior Director of Trust, has more than nineteen years' experience managing global security operations and assessments, including a decade of leading incident response and digital forensics. He is co-author of t...
The Internet of Things will greatly expand the opportunities for data collection and new business models driven off of that data. In her session at @ThingsExpo, Esmeralda Swartz, CMO of MetraTech, discussed how for this to be effective you not only need to have infrastructure and operational models capable of utilizing this new phenomenon, but increasingly service providers will need to convince a skeptical public to participate. Get ready to show them the money!
The Internet of Things will put IT to its ultimate test by creating infinite new opportunities to digitize products and services, generate and analyze new data to improve customer satisfaction, and discover new ways to gain a competitive advantage across nearly every industry. In order to help corporate business units to capitalize on the rapidly evolving IoT opportunities, IT must stand up to a new set of challenges. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Jeff Kaplan, Managing Director of THINKstrategies, will examine why IT must finally fulfill its role in support of its SBUs or face a new round of...
One of the biggest challenges when developing connected devices is identifying user value and delivering it through successful user experiences. In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, Mike Kuniavsky, Principal Scientist, Innovation Services at PARC, described an IoT-specific approach to user experience design that combines approaches from interaction design, industrial design and service design to create experiences that go beyond simple connected gadgets to create lasting, multi-device experiences grounded in people's real needs and desires.
Enthusiasm for the Internet of Things has reached an all-time high. In 2013 alone, venture capitalists spent more than $1 billion dollars investing in the IoT space. With "smart" appliances and devices, IoT covers wearable smart devices, cloud services to hardware companies. Nest, a Google company, detects temperatures inside homes and automatically adjusts it by tracking its user's habit. These technologies are quickly developing and with it come challenges such as bridging infrastructure gaps, abiding by privacy concerns and making the concept a reality. These challenges can't be addressed w...
The Domain Name Service (DNS) is one of the most important components in networking infrastructure, enabling users and services to access applications by translating URLs (names) into IP addresses (numbers). Because every icon and URL and all embedded content on a website requires a DNS lookup loading complex sites necessitates hundreds of DNS queries. In addition, as more internet-enabled ‘Things' get connected, people will rely on DNS to name and find their fridges, toasters and toilets. According to a recent IDG Research Services Survey this rate of traffic will only grow. What's driving t...
Scott Jenson leads a project called The Physical Web within the Chrome team at Google. Project members are working to take the scalability and openness of the web and use it to talk to the exponentially exploding range of smart devices. Nearly every company today working on the IoT comes up with the same basic solution: use my server and you'll be fine. But if we really believe there will be trillions of these devices, that just can't scale. We need a system that is open a scalable and by using the URL as a basic building block, we open this up and get the same resilience that the web enjoys.
Connected devices and the Internet of Things are getting significant momentum in 2014. In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, Jim Hunter, Chief Scientist & Technology Evangelist at Greenwave Systems, examined three key elements that together will drive mass adoption of the IoT before the end of 2015. The first element is the recent advent of robust open source protocols (like AllJoyn and WebRTC) that facilitate M2M communication. The second is broad availability of flexible, cost-effective storage designed to handle the massive surge in back-end data in a world where timely analytics is e...
We are reaching the end of the beginning with WebRTC, and real systems using this technology have begun to appear. One challenge that faces every WebRTC deployment (in some form or another) is identity management. For example, if you have an existing service – possibly built on a variety of different PaaS/SaaS offerings – and you want to add real-time communications you are faced with a challenge relating to user management, authentication, authorization, and validation. Service providers will want to use their existing identities, but these will have credentials already that are (hopefully) i...
"Matrix is an ambitious open standard and implementation that's set up to break down the fragmentation problems that exist in IP messaging and VoIP communication," explained John Woolf, Technical Evangelist at Matrix, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at @ThingsExpo, held Nov 4–6, 2014, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
P2P RTC will impact the landscape of communications, shifting from traditional telephony style communications models to OTT (Over-The-Top) cloud assisted & PaaS (Platform as a Service) communication services. The P2P shift will impact many areas of our lives, from mobile communication, human interactive web services, RTC and telephony infrastructure, user federation, security and privacy implications, business costs, and scalability. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Robin Raymond, Chief Architect at Hookflash, will walk through the shifting landscape of traditional telephone and voice services ...
Explosive growth in connected devices. Enormous amounts of data for collection and analysis. Critical use of data for split-second decision making and actionable information. All three are factors in making the Internet of Things a reality. Yet, any one factor would have an IT organization pondering its infrastructure strategy. How should your organization enhance its IT framework to enable an Internet of Things implementation? In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, James Kirkland, Chief Architect for the Internet of Things and Intelligent Systems at Red Hat, described how to revolutioniz...
Bit6 today issued a challenge to the technology community implementing Web Real Time Communication (WebRTC). To leap beyond WebRTC’s significant limitations and fully leverage its underlying value to accelerate innovation, application developers need to consider the entire communications ecosystem.
The definition of IoT is not new, in fact it’s been around for over a decade. What has changed is the public's awareness that the technology we use on a daily basis has caught up on the vision of an always on, always connected world. If you look into the details of what comprises the IoT, you’ll see that it includes everything from cloud computing, Big Data analytics, “Things,” Web communication, applications, network, storage, etc. It is essentially including everything connected online from hardware to software, or as we like to say, it’s an Internet of many different things. The difference ...
Cloud Expo 2014 TV commercials will feature @ThingsExpo, which was launched in June, 2014 at New York City's Javits Center as the largest 'Internet of Things' event in the world.