Welcome!

Java Authors: Carmen Gonzalez, Pat Romanski, Victoria Livschitz, Elizabeth White, Liz McMillan

Related Topics: SOA & WOA, Java, XML, .NET, AJAX & REA, Web 2.0

SOA & WOA: Article

Evaluating the Performance of SPDY-Enabled Web Servers

With all the advantages of SPDY, you may be wondering if there is a price to pay on the server side

As you may already know, SPDY (pronounced "SPeeDY") is a new networking protocol introduced by Google and designed to reduce the web latency associated with HTTP. With SPDY, web pages load up to 64 percent faster than HTTP alone, according to Google. It accomplishes this by adding a session layer between HTTP and SSL that supports concurrent, interleaved streams over a single TCP connection. The initial draft of HTTP/2.0, the future of the web, is based on SPDY, which is a welcome step forward considering that HTTP/1.0 was released in 1996. SPDY holds great potential for mobile devices, for which latency is more of an issue, and the market is catching on. As evidence of this, Microsoft recently announced the next version of Internet Explorer will support the new protocol.

Today, SPDY can be deployed on Apache by installing a single module (mod-spdy, the Apache SPDY module). No changes to website content are required. SPDY is now enabled by default on many of the latest modern browsers, including Chrome, Firefox, Opera, and Android Browser. (You can check your own browser's support by visiting isspdyenabled.com.)

Simply by deploying the SPDY module on your Apache server, you can provide a large percentage of your users with better response times. More important, the response times of a website are correlated with the site's conversion rate and bounce rate - so SPDY can have a significant positive impact on your business!

With all the advantages of SPDY, you may be wondering if there is a price to pay on the server side. Moving from HTTP to SPDY adds encryption and compression overhead, which clearly requires more resources. It does, however, use fewer TCP connections. It wasn't immediately clear to me if all these changes in aggregate would cause noticeable drawbacks on the server.

To get to the bottom of this question, I thought it would be interesting to get some real-world performance metrics on SPDY, in particular its effect on the server side. To obtain this information, I used the new SPDY support in NeoLoad to run load tests of SPDY and compare its performance against HTTP and HTTPS.

Test Configuration Details
My approach was to test a server with a fairly typical configuration - not one that is finely tuned for a specific purpose. This setup provides a basis for comparing HTTP, HTTPS and SPDY. It's important to note here that changes to the application or the server configuration will produce different results - perhaps vastly different.

Test setup:
●     Server:
○     OS: Linux CentOS 6.3
○     Hardware:
■      Intel Core i3 CPU 540 @ 3.07GHz
■     4GB RAM
○     Apache
■     Version 2.2.15
■     worker MPM:
<IfModuleworker.c>
>StartServers    5
MaxClients      600
MinSpareThreads       50
MaxSpareThreads      150
ThreadsPerChild         50
MaxRequestsPerChild 0
</IfModule>

■     SPDY module (mod-spdy-beta-0.9.3.3-386.x86_64). Default SPDY optimization flags were used (uncommented suggested values):
●     SpdyMaxThreadsPerProcess 30
●     SpdyMaxStreamsPerConnection 100
●     Application:
○     1 web page: 1 HTML 9.5kB + 50 PNG icons (32x32).
○     The web page and all resources were served by the same server.
●     Load testing tool: NeoLoad 4.1.2
●     Tests:
○     Ramp-up from 1 to 1000 users for 20 minutes.
○     Scenario: 1 page call, wait for 5s, restart.
○     Chrome browser simulated, with 6 parallel connections to the server.
○     Emulated latency: 40ms in download, 45ms in upload.
○     Test HTTP, HTTPS, and SPDY under the same conditions.
○      Aggregation period of 30s for graphs. This smoothes variations to simplify comparison between several tests.

Results and Analysis
First I wanted to examine the hit rate (hits per second), average response time (duration), and number of errors as the number of concurrent users increased.

Here are the results for the HTTP test:

The plot illustrates the following:

  • At three minutes, the maximum number of page per second is reached. This maximum rate (16 pages/s or 827 request/s) is reached at 120 virtual users (VU), and the rate decreases as more concurrent users are added.
  • At the same time (the three-minute mark), response time starts to increase significantly.
  • The first errors (which investigation revealed to be timeouts) appear at 405 users.

The table below compares these metrics for HTTP, HTTPS, and SPDY:

 

HTTP

HTTPS

SPDY

Maximum pages/s

16.3 pages/s

after 3 minutes at 120 users

15.9 pages/s

after 3 minutes at 120 users

98 pages/s

after 14 minutes at 777 users

Page response time at 100 users

1.1s

1.3s

1.1s

Page response time at 120 users

1.4 s

1.5s

1.1s

Page response time at 200 users

7.1s

7.8s

1.1s

Page response time at 777 users

70.2s

72s

2.7s

First error

405 Users

225 Users

884 Users

Service-level agreement violation (< 3s page load time)

133 Users

133 Users

794 Users

 

Based on a service-level agreement (SLA) of less than 3s for page load time, my test server handled almost six times as many users with SPDY than HTTP.

More users with fewer workers
To handle incoming requests in parallel, Apache web servers use worker threads to process each request. Because each thread consumes resources and memory, Apache lets the system administrator limit thread use, which has an effect on how incoming requests are handled.

My HTTP and HTTPS results are typical of a scenario known as thread starvation.

This is confirmed by the following graph, which shows busy workers in orange, page rate in green, and user load in blue:

The number of busy Apache workers (threads) hits its maximum at the same time the page rate reaches its maximum.

In contrast to HTTP/S, SPDY uses a single connection for all requests. The principal benefit of this is the decreased latency seen by the client, resulting in reduced response times for users. There is another great benefit on the server side: SPDY clients consume one worker instead of six. As a result it takes much longer (that is, many more users) for all workers to become busy:

SPDY enables the server to handle more users with the same number of workers.

Server CPU and memory consumption
So far, I showed how SPDY affects Apache worker usage with my test configuration. Next, I wanted to see how CPU usage and memory were affected by SPDY.

Here is a plot showing system idle time (low when the CPU is used intensively) for HTTP/HTTPS/SPDY:

No surprise here - as most HTTP/HTTPS requests are waiting to be served after the thread limit is reached, they don't consume much CPU. For the SPDY tests, Apache is below the worker limit for much longer, resulting in a higher page rate and consequently more CPU used. The curve plateau is reached when all workers are busy (around 11 minutes).

To better understand the behavior before the worker limit is reached, I focused on the numbers at two minutes, 88 virtual users, and 12.5 pages/s. The CPU idle time measurements are an average of six values taken over 30 seconds:

CPU

HTTP

HTTPS

SPDY

CPU Idle time at 2 minutes

93.33%

91.5%

92%

The values are comparable; SPDY consumes slightly less CPU than HTTPS and slightly more than HTTP for this load.

On the memory side, here's the global overview:

Again, it's interesting to examine the memory used before the worker limit is reached. The numbers are an average of six measurements over 30 seconds.

System Memory

01:00

02:00

Difference = Consumed Memory

HTTP

3,357 MB

3,416 MB

59 MB

HTTPS

3,500 MB

3,579 MB

79 MB

SPDY

3,607 MB

3,631 MB

24 MB

The server consumed less memory when handling SPDY requests than when handling HTTP and HTTPS.

During this test, SPDY consumed just 41% of the memory consumed by HTTP, and just 30% of the memory consumed by HTTPS.

Conclusion
It's no surprise that SPDY improves response times on the client side; that's what it was designed to do. It turns out that SPDY also has advantages on the server side:

  • Compared to HTTPS, SPDY requests consume fewer resources (CPU and memory) on the server.
  • Compared to HTTP, SPDY requests consume less memory but a bit more CPU. This may be good, bad, or irrelevant depending on which resource (if either) is currently limiting your server.
  • Compared to HTTP/S, SPDY requires fewer Apache worker threads, which increases server capacity. As a result, the server may attract more SPDY traffic.

From these results, it's clear that Apache tuning performed for HTTP/S may not be appropriate after SPDY is enabled on the server. It's important to take the time to re-evaluate server sizing and retune the server before you start handling SPDY requests from your users.

As I mentioned earlier, the test results I've shared here are specific to my server configuration and the web page I used for the tests. It's important to understand how your server will perform under a realistic user load before you make SPDY available to the users on your site. I encourage you to test your own server and website using a load testing tool such as NeoLoad (there's a free 30-day trial if you want) to see how SPDY will affect your users' response times and your server's performance.

More Stories By Hervé Servy

Hervé Servy is a Senior Performance Engineer at Neotys. He has spent 10 years working for IBM-Rational and Microsoft pre-sales and marketing in France and the Middle East. During the past 3 years, as a personal project, Hervé founded a nonprofit organization in the health 2.0 area. If that isn’t techie enough, Hervé was also born on the very same day Apple Computer was founded.

Comments (0)

Share your thoughts on this story.

Add your comment
You must be signed in to add a comment. Sign-in | Register

In accordance with our Comment Policy, we encourage comments that are on topic, relevant and to-the-point. We will remove comments that include profanity, personal attacks, racial slurs, threats of violence, or other inappropriate material that violates our Terms and Conditions, and will block users who make repeated violations. We ask all readers to expect diversity of opinion and to treat one another with dignity and respect.


@ThingsExpo Stories
The 3rd International Internet of @ThingsExpo, co-located with the 16th International Cloud Expo - to be held June 9-11, 2015, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY - announces that its Call for Papers is now open. The Internet of Things (IoT) is the biggest idea since the creation of the Worldwide Web more than 20 years ago.
The security devil is always in the details of the attack: the ones you've endured, the ones you prepare yourself to fend off, and the ones that, you fear, will catch you completely unaware and defenseless. The Internet of Things (IoT) is nothing if not an endless proliferation of details. It's the vision of a world in which continuous Internet connectivity and addressability is embedded into a growing range of human artifacts, into the natural world, and even into our smartphones, appliances, and physical persons. In the IoT vision, every new "thing" - sensor, actuator, data source, data con...
Cultural, regulatory, environmental, political and economic (CREPE) conditions over the past decade are creating cross-industry solution spaces that require processes and technologies from both the Internet of Things (IoT), and Data Management and Analytics (DMA). These solution spaces are evolving into Sensor Analytics Ecosystems (SAE) that represent significant new opportunities for organizations of all types. Public Utilities throughout the world, providing electricity, natural gas and water, are pursuing SmartGrid initiatives that represent one of the more mature examples of SAE. We have s...
How do APIs and IoT relate? The answer is not as simple as merely adding an API on top of a dumb device, but rather about understanding the architectural patterns for implementing an IoT fabric. There are typically two or three trends: Exposing the device to a management framework Exposing that management framework to a business centric logic Exposing that business layer and data to end users. This last trend is the IoT stack, which involves a new shift in the separation of what stuff happens, where data lives and where the interface lies. For instance, it's a mix of architectural styles ...
The Internet of Things is tied together with a thin strand that is known as time. Coincidentally, at the core of nearly all data analytics is a timestamp. When working with time series data there are a few core principles that everyone should consider, especially across datasets where time is the common boundary. In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, Jim Scott, Director of Enterprise Strategy & Architecture at MapR Technologies, discussed single-value, geo-spatial, and log time series data. By focusing on enterprise applications and the data center, he will use OpenTSDB as an example t...
An entirely new security model is needed for the Internet of Things, or is it? Can we save some old and tested controls for this new and different environment? In his session at @ThingsExpo, New York's at the Javits Center, Davi Ottenheimer, EMC Senior Director of Trust, reviewed hands-on lessons with IoT devices and reveal a new risk balance you might not expect. Davi Ottenheimer, EMC Senior Director of Trust, has more than nineteen years' experience managing global security operations and assessments, including a decade of leading incident response and digital forensics. He is co-author of t...
The Internet of Things will greatly expand the opportunities for data collection and new business models driven off of that data. In her session at @ThingsExpo, Esmeralda Swartz, CMO of MetraTech, discussed how for this to be effective you not only need to have infrastructure and operational models capable of utilizing this new phenomenon, but increasingly service providers will need to convince a skeptical public to participate. Get ready to show them the money!
The Internet of Things will put IT to its ultimate test by creating infinite new opportunities to digitize products and services, generate and analyze new data to improve customer satisfaction, and discover new ways to gain a competitive advantage across nearly every industry. In order to help corporate business units to capitalize on the rapidly evolving IoT opportunities, IT must stand up to a new set of challenges. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Jeff Kaplan, Managing Director of THINKstrategies, will examine why IT must finally fulfill its role in support of its SBUs or face a new round of...
One of the biggest challenges when developing connected devices is identifying user value and delivering it through successful user experiences. In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, Mike Kuniavsky, Principal Scientist, Innovation Services at PARC, described an IoT-specific approach to user experience design that combines approaches from interaction design, industrial design and service design to create experiences that go beyond simple connected gadgets to create lasting, multi-device experiences grounded in people's real needs and desires.
Enthusiasm for the Internet of Things has reached an all-time high. In 2013 alone, venture capitalists spent more than $1 billion dollars investing in the IoT space. With "smart" appliances and devices, IoT covers wearable smart devices, cloud services to hardware companies. Nest, a Google company, detects temperatures inside homes and automatically adjusts it by tracking its user's habit. These technologies are quickly developing and with it come challenges such as bridging infrastructure gaps, abiding by privacy concerns and making the concept a reality. These challenges can't be addressed w...
The Domain Name Service (DNS) is one of the most important components in networking infrastructure, enabling users and services to access applications by translating URLs (names) into IP addresses (numbers). Because every icon and URL and all embedded content on a website requires a DNS lookup loading complex sites necessitates hundreds of DNS queries. In addition, as more internet-enabled ‘Things' get connected, people will rely on DNS to name and find their fridges, toasters and toilets. According to a recent IDG Research Services Survey this rate of traffic will only grow. What's driving t...
Connected devices and the Internet of Things are getting significant momentum in 2014. In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, Jim Hunter, Chief Scientist & Technology Evangelist at Greenwave Systems, examined three key elements that together will drive mass adoption of the IoT before the end of 2015. The first element is the recent advent of robust open source protocols (like AllJoyn and WebRTC) that facilitate M2M communication. The second is broad availability of flexible, cost-effective storage designed to handle the massive surge in back-end data in a world where timely analytics is e...
Scott Jenson leads a project called The Physical Web within the Chrome team at Google. Project members are working to take the scalability and openness of the web and use it to talk to the exponentially exploding range of smart devices. Nearly every company today working on the IoT comes up with the same basic solution: use my server and you'll be fine. But if we really believe there will be trillions of these devices, that just can't scale. We need a system that is open a scalable and by using the URL as a basic building block, we open this up and get the same resilience that the web enjoys.
We are reaching the end of the beginning with WebRTC, and real systems using this technology have begun to appear. One challenge that faces every WebRTC deployment (in some form or another) is identity management. For example, if you have an existing service – possibly built on a variety of different PaaS/SaaS offerings – and you want to add real-time communications you are faced with a challenge relating to user management, authentication, authorization, and validation. Service providers will want to use their existing identities, but these will have credentials already that are (hopefully) i...
"Matrix is an ambitious open standard and implementation that's set up to break down the fragmentation problems that exist in IP messaging and VoIP communication," explained John Woolf, Technical Evangelist at Matrix, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at @ThingsExpo, held Nov 4–6, 2014, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
P2P RTC will impact the landscape of communications, shifting from traditional telephony style communications models to OTT (Over-The-Top) cloud assisted & PaaS (Platform as a Service) communication services. The P2P shift will impact many areas of our lives, from mobile communication, human interactive web services, RTC and telephony infrastructure, user federation, security and privacy implications, business costs, and scalability. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Robin Raymond, Chief Architect at Hookflash, will walk through the shifting landscape of traditional telephone and voice services ...
Explosive growth in connected devices. Enormous amounts of data for collection and analysis. Critical use of data for split-second decision making and actionable information. All three are factors in making the Internet of Things a reality. Yet, any one factor would have an IT organization pondering its infrastructure strategy. How should your organization enhance its IT framework to enable an Internet of Things implementation? In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, James Kirkland, Chief Architect for the Internet of Things and Intelligent Systems at Red Hat, described how to revolutioniz...
Bit6 today issued a challenge to the technology community implementing Web Real Time Communication (WebRTC). To leap beyond WebRTC’s significant limitations and fully leverage its underlying value to accelerate innovation, application developers need to consider the entire communications ecosystem.
The definition of IoT is not new, in fact it’s been around for over a decade. What has changed is the public's awareness that the technology we use on a daily basis has caught up on the vision of an always on, always connected world. If you look into the details of what comprises the IoT, you’ll see that it includes everything from cloud computing, Big Data analytics, “Things,” Web communication, applications, network, storage, etc. It is essentially including everything connected online from hardware to software, or as we like to say, it’s an Internet of many different things. The difference ...
Cloud Expo 2014 TV commercials will feature @ThingsExpo, which was launched in June, 2014 at New York City's Javits Center as the largest 'Internet of Things' event in the world.