| By Bruce Guptill, Mike West | Article Rating: |
|
| January 15, 2007 07:30 AM EST | Reads: |
10,390 |
Due to the terms of its open source license, Red Hat cannot effectively prevent Oracle from licensing, reselling, and supporting its version of Linux. In effect, Red Hat – and almost any other open source software developer or distributor – provides well-positioned competitors, especially large IT “Master Brands” such as Oracle, with the ability to compete directly, and possibly to put them out of business.
The Oracle move is strategically brilliant. Oracle gains an almost-instant, solid foothold in open source, which is one of the fastest-growing software market segments in the world, and which has extremely broad appeal to users in every geographical and industry market.
Oracle also gains commercially-leveragable access to a wealth of leading-edge technology and users without significant capital investment. It needs to train and deploy/redeploy its technical services resources to support Red Hat Linux, of course, but resource software training and deployment is typically considered a cost of doing business among enterprise software vendors.
At Saugatuck Technology, we expect other enterprise software Master Brands (e.g., IBM, MSFT, SAP) to employ similar tactics, not just in Linux but in all open source software arenas including desktop and server-based applications. The dam has broken.
Finally, open source developers and distributors now must face a threat that always existed – but which many had not taken seriously for a number of reasons, including the ongoing skepticism of many old-line IT and vendor executives about the commercial attraction and viability of open source software.
Saugatuck’s own research since 2004 has shown continuing, significant increases in open source adoption in all markets, from operating systems to enterprise productivity software to server desktop applications. Growing markets attract competition; large markets attract large competitors.
Published January 15, 2007 Reads 10,390
Copyright © 2007 SYS-CON Media, Inc. — All Rights Reserved.
Syndicated stories and blog feeds, all rights reserved by the author.
More Stories By Bruce Guptill
Bruce Guptil is a consultant with Saugatuck Technology.
More Stories By Mike West
Mike West is a consultant with Saugatech Technology.
- Cloud CEOs, CTOs & SVPs to Speak at 4th International Cloud Computing Expo
- Kindle 2 vs Nook
- Why IBM’s Server Chief Got Busted
- The Difference Between Web Hosting and Cloud Computing
- Cloud Computing Journal Opens "Readers' Choice Awards" Nominations
- Cloud Computing Expo: Exclusive Q&A with Yahoo! SVP Cloud Computing
- Industry Experts Discuss the State of Cloud Computing
- Ajax in RichFaces 3.3, JSF 2 and RichFaces 4
- It's the Java vs. C++ Shootout Revisited!
- The End of IT 1.0 As We Know It Has Begun
- An Introduction to Abbot
- Java Kicks Ruby on Rails in the Butt
- Interviewing Java Developers With Tears in My Eyes
- Cloud CEOs, CTOs & SVPs to Speak at 4th International Cloud Computing Expo
- 1st Annual Government IT Expo: Call for Papers Deadline July 15
- How to Diagnose Java Resource Starvation
- REA Is Where RIA Becomes the Norm
- Kindle 2 vs Nook
- Anatomy of a Java Finalizer
- Why IBM’s Server Chief Got Busted
- A Cup of AJAX? Nay, Just Regular Java Please
- Java Developer's Journal Exclusive: 2006 "JDJ Editors' Choice" Awards
- The i-Technology Right Stuff
- JavaServer Faces (JSF) vs Struts
- Rich Internet Applications with Adobe Flex 2 and Java
- Java vs C++ "Shootout" Revisited
- Bean-Managed Persistence Using a Proxy List
- Reporting Made Easy with JasperReports and Hibernate
- Creating a Pet Store Application with JavaServer Faces, Spring, and Hibernate
- What's New in Eclipse?


































