Java IoT Authors: Elizabeth White, Yeshim Deniz, Pat Romanski, Liz McMillan, Paul Simmons

Related Topics: Java IoT

Java IoT: Article

Are Vendors Becoming More in Charge of Java Enterprise Edition...

...or is Sun losing control over Java EE?

One of the things that kept me and my team busy over the past couple of years was starting to support J2EE 1.4 in OptimalJ - a goal that we accomplished with the release of OptimalJ 4.2. Now that this job is complete, it's interesting to look back and ponder the experience and learn from it.

As OptimalJ is a vendor-neutral modeling tool that generates J2EE applications, we tend to avoid application server-specific features that are not mandated by J2EE. Typically our first take is to implement our code-generation modules by the letter of the spec and then ensure we fill in the necessary bits for a particular vendor by generating additional vendor-specific deployment descriptors. This task, quite feasible at first sight, proved rather intricate with J2EE 1.4. Why? One reason is incomplete implementations of certain parts of the spec. However, there were more causes as you'll see later. But first let's recap the history of J2EE 1.4.

The spec was released in November 2003. The first J2EE product certified by Sun was JBoss 4.0.0 released in July 2004. IBM's WebSphere 6.0 went out in October 2004, while BEA's WebLogic offering hit the market in July 2005. All these products passed Sun's J2EE 1.4 CTS. For an idea of what the J2EE CTS embodies, take a look at this interview: www.theserverside.com/tt/articles/article.tss?l=SunInterview. Here's a relevant quote from http://java.sun.com/javaee/overview/faq/j2ee.jsp (my emboldening):

J2EE technology is a set of standards that many vendors can implement. The vendors are free to compete on implementations but not on standards or APIs. Sun supplies a comprehensive J2EE Compatibility Test Suite (CTS) to J2EE licensees. The J2EE CTS helps ensure compatibility among the application vendors, which helps ensure portability for the applications and components written for the J2EE platform. The J2EE platform brings Write Once, Run Anywhere (WORA) to the server.

Problems Encountered
Our first surprise was with the new MDB (message-driven bean) contract. One vendor's product simply couldn't cope with the new activation configuration concept. This is really the core functionality of EJB 2.1 and JCA 1.5. In EJB 2.1, MDBs are decoupled from JMS and their component contract is changed to be extremely generic and extensible. They can receive messages from virtually any inbound resource adapter, not necessarily a JMS adapter. If you want to learn more about the interaction between resource adapters and MDBs in J2EE 1.4, take a look at this article: www.theserverside.com/tt/articles/article.tss?l=J2EE1_4. It is amazing how the product could pass Sun's J2EE 1.4 CTS without implementing this support.

The next wrinkle was with the timer service - a long-asked-for missing piece of J2EE that enables enterprise components to have a reliable and transactional timer. An enterprise component can request that a callback method be invoked on it after a given passage of time (possibly repeatedly). The component can query for pending callbacks, cancel some of them, add new ones, etc.

An important consideration here is to note that in EJB 2.1 all instances of the same stateless session bean (SLSB) and the same MDB are considered equal, i.e., if the container has created and pooled n instances of SLSB BeanA and one such bean instance has scheduled a time notification, the container can pick any of the n instances in the pool to service the request. While the timer notification is pending, any of the n BeanA instances that the container invokes can query for pending timer notifications and see that the notification is pending. That instance can cancel it, so that the timer event will be annulled and not invoked on any of the n instances.

Great was my surprise when I saw that one vendor implemented the timer service without regard for the above fact. The vendor's product sometimes allowed one instance of BeanA to observe the pending timer notification as cancelled and then suddenly again as pending - all in the same transaction!

A friend of mine, who works at another company, had a similar experience with his vendor (also certified by Sun as J2EE 1.4 compliant). He was deploying his application in a cluster and used the timer service with SLSBs. The phenomenon he witnessed was this: he had a pool of n BeanA instances deployed to multiple nodes in the cluster. When any of the n BeanA instances scheduled a timer notification, only the BeanA instances running on the same node as the bean instance that scheduled the notification could see and service it. BeanA instances running on different nodes would neither see the pending notification nor be able to examine or cancel it, which essentially breaks the EJB requirement that all instances of the same SLSB have the same object identity.

With such surprises from certified J2EE 1.4 servers, how can you write a portable J2EE component that uses the timer service and enjoy the "Write Once, Run Anywhere" experience?

All this was small time compared to the issues we ran into when dealing with the highlight of J2EE 1.4 - support for Web services. The details of a compliant J2EE 1.4 Web services implementation are spelled out by three constituent specs that J2EE 1.4 includes by reference: Web Services For J2EE, Version 1.1 (aka JSR-109/JSR-921), JAX-RPC, Version 1.1, and WS-I Basic Profile, Version 1.0. The last specification is crucial in ensuring interoperability of Web service components developed with J2EE.

One cardinal requirement of a compliant Web services stack is that it can handle literal serializations/deserializations of Java Data Models into/from XML. The need to support literal serialization of data calls for an XML Schema-aware Web service. If a vendor's Web service stack is not XML Schema aware, you will very likely have issues with the interoperability of the Web services you deploy to the vendor's product.

When we started testing our code generation modules on one vendor's product, we were in for a big surprise. The application server had a non-XML Schema-aware Web services stack, which effectively meant no proper support for WS-I Basic Profile. Why wasn't such a major omission caught by J2EE 1.4 CTS?

That wasn't all. Two products we tried couldn't handle overloaded methods in service endpoint interfaces (SEIs) of J2EE components. For an idea of what the SEI is, refer to my earlier article "Moving to SOA in J2EE 1.4" (http://java.sys-con.com/read/180362.htm).

Another major obstacle was with document-literal bindings. One of the three vendor products we support required that additional Java code artifacts called "wrapper beans" be generated and registered in a JAX-RPC type mapping DD for every operation of a SEI that is exposed as a Web service component with a document-literal binding, while two other products wouldn't work when such extra code artifacts were generated and registered. Yet more unfortunate was the fact that the product requiring the extra code artifacts left it up to the component developer to provide these rather than generate them automatically during deployment. Being quite unhappy with such a state of affairs, I decided to contact the "Web Services for Java EE" specification lead with a view to ensuring that the issue be resolved to the benefit of Java EE developers and the "Write Once, Run Anywhere" goal. One reply I got back from the spec lead was this:

We had clarified to you before on this issue that there is not much we can do for the JAX-RPC case with JSR-109 v1.1 or v1.2. There are J2EE 1.4 compliant application server vendors who have passed the CTS (Compatibility Test Suite) and changes proposed by you would mean that they would now need to fix their implementations to conform to this new requirement. This will not be received well by vendors who have all ready spent their resources getting J2EE 1.4 certification. While I do appreciate your intentions of improving developer experience, this may be a bit too disruptive for the application server vendors/licensees.

We have made improvements in the deployment/packaging process with the latest release of JSR-109 v1.2 (part of Java EE 5.0) for JAX-WS endpoints. Unfortunately we found more inconsistencies with document-literal bindings. One J2EE 1.4 certified vendor couldn't deal with Web service components featuring methods without a return type when a component's binding was document-literal.

Another problematic area was the JavaBean-based nature of SOAP serialization rules (http://java.sys-con.com/read/180362.htm). When a J2EE Web service component receives or returns a value mapped to a JavaBean, the container is supposed to serialize it to/deserialize it from XML by using the java.beans.Introspector class to examine its properties. Two out of three products we tried didn't do that in the initial version of their products.

It's true that it is all but inevitable that a complex product has bugs, still most of the issues I presented above are of a bigger scale than simple bugs and should have been flagged with the J2EE 1.4 CTS.

Where Does Modeling Come In?
With the differences in implementing the same J2EE 1.4 features I described, you should probably start questioning how feasible it would be to maintain a J2EE 1.4 application that needs to run on more than one application server and not be rigged toward a given vendor. Based on the experience we have gone through, I've come to the conclusion that doing that might be quite a pain and will definitely not scale as the size of your application's code base increases. This, in my opinion, is a valid example in which model-driven architecture and development delivers the fruits so long as you have chosen a mature and reputable MDA product that supports J2EE.

You are welcome to discuss the topic on my blog: http://blogs.compuware.com/cs/blogs/andrei_iltchenko/default.aspx.

More Stories By Andrei Iltchenko

Andrei Iltchenko is a development lead at Compuware Corporation where he works on the MDA product OptimalJ and is responsible for the business logic area of OptimalJ-generated J2EE applications. He is also a Sun certified Java developer for Java Web Services, a Sun Certified Business Component Developer, a Sun Certified Developer, and a Sun Certified Programmer.

Comments (0)

Share your thoughts on this story.

Add your comment
You must be signed in to add a comment. Sign-in | Register

In accordance with our Comment Policy, we encourage comments that are on topic, relevant and to-the-point. We will remove comments that include profanity, personal attacks, racial slurs, threats of violence, or other inappropriate material that violates our Terms and Conditions, and will block users who make repeated violations. We ask all readers to expect diversity of opinion and to treat one another with dignity and respect.

@ThingsExpo Stories
Most people haven’t heard the word, “gamification,” even though they probably, and perhaps unwittingly, participate in it every day. Gamification is “the process of adding games or game-like elements to something (as a task) so as to encourage participation.” Further, gamification is about bringing game mechanics – rules, constructs, processes, and methods – into the real world in an effort to engage people. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Robert Endo, owner and engagement manager of Intrepid D...
Recently, WebRTC has a lot of eyes from market. The use cases of WebRTC are expanding - video chat, online education, online health care etc. Not only for human-to-human communication, but also IoT use cases such as machine to human use cases can be seen recently. One of the typical use-case is remote camera monitoring. With WebRTC, people can have interoperability and flexibility for deploying monitoring service. However, the benefit of WebRTC for IoT is not only its convenience and interopera...
Michael Maximilien, better known as max or Dr. Max, is a computer scientist with IBM. At IBM Research Triangle Park, he was a principal engineer for the worldwide industry point-of-sale standard: JavaPOS. At IBM Research, some highlights include pioneering research on semantic Web services, mashups, and cloud computing, and platform-as-a-service. He joined the IBM Cloud Labs in 2014 and works closely with Pivotal Inc., to help make the Cloud Found the best PaaS.
Everything run by electricity will eventually be connected to the Internet. Get ahead of the Internet of Things revolution. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Akvelon expert and IoT industry leader Sergey Grebnov provided an educational dive into the world of managing your home, workplace and all the devices they contain with the power of machine-based AI and intelligent Bot services for a completely streamlined experience.
Cloud-enabled transformation has evolved from cost saving measure to business innovation strategy -- one that combines the cloud with cognitive capabilities to drive market disruption. Learn how you can achieve the insight and agility you need to gain a competitive advantage. Industry-acclaimed CTO and cloud expert, Shankar Kalyana presents. Only the most exceptional IBMers are appointed with the rare distinction of IBM Fellow, the highest technical honor in the company. Shankar has also receive...
Business professionals no longer wonder if they'll migrate to the cloud; it's now a matter of when. The cloud environment has proved to be a major force in transitioning to an agile business model that enables quick decisions and fast implementation that solidify customer relationships. And when the cloud is combined with the power of cognitive computing, it drives innovation and transformation that achieves astounding competitive advantage.
Personalization has long been the holy grail of marketing. Simply stated, communicate the most relevant offer to the right person and you will increase sales. To achieve this, you must understand the individual. Consequently, digital marketers developed many ways to gather and leverage customer information to deliver targeted experiences. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Lou Casal, Founder and Principal Consultant at Practicala, discussed how the Internet of Things (IoT) has accelerated our abilit...
In his session at Cloud Expo, Alan Winters, U.S. Head of Business Development at MobiDev, presented a success story of an entrepreneur who has both suffered through and benefited from offshore development across multiple businesses: The smart choice, or how to select the right offshore development partner Warning signs, or how to minimize chances of making the wrong choice Collaboration, or how to establish the most effective work processes Budget control, or how to maximize project result...
To get the most out of their data, successful companies are not focusing on queries and data lakes, they are actively integrating analytics into their operations with a data-first application development approach. Real-time adjustments to improve revenues, reduce costs, or mitigate risk rely on applications that minimize latency on a variety of data sources. In his session at @BigDataExpo, Jack Norris, Senior Vice President, Data and Applications at MapR Technologies, reviewed best practices to ...
Data is the fuel that drives the machine learning algorithmic engines and ultimately provides the business value. In his session at Cloud Expo, Ed Featherston, a director and senior enterprise architect at Collaborative Consulting, discussed the key considerations around quality, volume, timeliness, and pedigree that must be dealt with in order to properly fuel that engine.
In his keynote at 19th Cloud Expo, Sheng Liang, co-founder and CEO of Rancher Labs, discussed the technological advances and new business opportunities created by the rapid adoption of containers. With the success of Amazon Web Services (AWS) and various open source technologies used to build private clouds, cloud computing has become an essential component of IT strategy. However, users continue to face challenges in implementing clouds, as older technologies evolve and newer ones like Docker c...
"Akvelon is a software development company and we also provide consultancy services to folks who are looking to scale or accelerate their engineering roadmaps," explained Jeremiah Mothersell, Marketing Manager at Akvelon, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 21st Cloud Expo, held Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
Two weeks ago (November 3-5), I attended the Cloud Expo Silicon Valley as a speaker, where I presented on the security and privacy due diligence requirements for cloud solutions. Cloud security is a topical issue for every CIO, CISO, and technology buyer. Decision-makers are always looking for insights on how to mitigate the security risks of implementing and using cloud solutions. Based on the presentation topics covered at the conference, as well as the general discussions heard between sessio...
To Really Work for Enterprises, MultiCloud Adoption Requires Far Better and Inclusive Cloud Monitoring and Cost Management … But How? Overwhelmingly, even as enterprises have adopted cloud computing and are expanding to multi-cloud computing, IT leaders remain concerned about how to monitor, manage and control costs across hybrid and multi-cloud deployments. It’s clear that traditional IT monitoring and management approaches, designed after all for on-premises data centers, are falling short in ...
Organizations planning enterprise data center consolidation and modernization projects are faced with a challenging, costly reality. Requirements to deploy modern, cloud-native applications simultaneously with traditional client/server applications are almost impossible to achieve with hardware-centric enterprise infrastructure. Compute and network infrastructure are fast moving down a software-defined path, but storage has been a laggard. Until now.
DXWorldEXPO LLC announced today that the upcoming DXWorldEXPO | CloudEXPO New York event will feature 10 companies from Poland to participate at the "Poland Digital Transformation Pavilion" on November 12-13, 2018.
Digital Transformation is much more than a buzzword. The radical shift to digital mechanisms for almost every process is evident across all industries and verticals. This is often especially true in financial services, where the legacy environment is many times unable to keep up with the rapidly shifting demands of the consumer. The constant pressure to provide complete, omnichannel delivery of customer-facing solutions to meet both regulatory and customer demands is putting enormous pressure on...
The best way to leverage your CloudEXPO | DXWorldEXPO presence as a sponsor and exhibitor is to plan your news announcements around our events. The press covering CloudEXPO | DXWorldEXPO will have access to these releases and will amplify your news announcements. More than two dozen Cloud companies either set deals at our shows or have announced their mergers and acquisitions at CloudEXPO. Product announcements during our show provide your company with the most reach through our targeted audienc...
In an era of historic innovation fueled by unprecedented access to data and technology, the low cost and risk of entering new markets has leveled the playing field for business. Today, any ambitious innovator can easily introduce a new application or product that can reinvent business models and transform the client experience. In their Day 2 Keynote at 19th Cloud Expo, Mercer Rowe, IBM Vice President of Strategic Alliances, and Raejeanne Skillern, Intel Vice President of Data Center Group and ...
More and more brands have jumped on the IoT bandwagon. We have an excess of wearables – activity trackers, smartwatches, smart glasses and sneakers, and more that track seemingly endless datapoints. However, most consumers have no idea what “IoT” means. Creating more wearables that track data shouldn't be the aim of brands; delivering meaningful, tangible relevance to their users should be. We're in a period in which the IoT pendulum is still swinging. Initially, it swung toward "smart for smart...