|By Tod Cunningham||
|January 1, 1998 12:00 AM EST||
Multi-tasking is rapidly becoming a necessity in software development today. All major operating systems support some form of multi-tasking, and as costs come down it is becoming common for high end systems to incorporate multiple processors.
Multi-Tasking and Threads
At its most basic level, multi-tasking allows multiple programs to be run at the "same" time. The best way to visualize this is to think of each application as running on its own processor.
It would be quite inefficient for each application to have a dedicated processor. A major function of most modern operating systems is to make each application share access to processors by preempting one application to let another one run. Figure 1 illustrates the difference between processor sharing and non-sharing.
Just like programs can run concurrently, pieces of the same program can run concurrently. This ability is known as threading and it is what Java supports. Figure 2 illustrates how a program can be threaded.
Threads are becoming more popular because they are faster to set up, often require less memory and allow better encapsulation.
Commonly, it is the responsibility of the operating system to schedule and preempt each thread, just like it preempts each application. This usually leads to platform-specific methods of multi-threading.
Most programming languages rely on operating system-specific calls to support multi-threading. For example: C/C++ programs in Unix often use fork() and Window 95/NT C/C++ programs often use CreateThread(). This can cause a lot of headaches when trying to port an application.
Since one of Java's goals is to "write once, run anywhere", the Java language specification contains support for threading. In theory, this allows multi-threaded programs to be run on any platform which supports Java without concern for how the Java Virtual Machine (JVM) actually implements the threading.
Most JVMs don't actually use native operating system threads to implement threading. They implement their own task scheduling and context switching algorithms within the JVM. This makes the JVM easier to port from one operating system to another. However, Sun is going to be releasing a JVM for the Sun Solaris SPARC which uses native threads to implement Java threads. Having the JVM use native threads can be a real benefit to Java applications because of gained responsiveness to other running processes. Best of all, a Java application doesn't have to do anything special to make use of benefits supplied by different implementations.
Introduction to Java Threading
Java is one of the few common-programming languages that actually supports threading in the language itself.
Java defines a Thread class and a Runnable interface that can be used to define a thread object. Take a look at the Basic Thread example that derives from the Thread class. It creates two threads that display messages asynchronously.
Run this example multiple times and under different JVMs and see how and when the messages are displayed.
Depending on the speed of your machine and the JVM you are using, it may appear that the threads are not being preempted. For example: All of the first thread's messages may be printed followed by all of the second thread's messages.
This usually happens when running on a fast computer or using Just-In-Time (JIT) Java. The reason for this is that one of the sample threads may actually finishing printing all of its messages before it is scheduled for preemption. Try making the threads take longer to finish by increasing MAX_INDEX to 100 (or more) and see what happens.
The Basic Thread example derives from the Thread class to create a thread object; However, a class may implement the Runnable interface instead.
Implementing the Runnable interface is useful when a class needs to be multi-threaded and also be derived from another class. Remember that Java supports only single inheritance.
To change the Basic Thread example to use a Runnable interface, change the CountThread definition to:
public class CountThread implements Runnable Then, change the CountThread object declarations to:
CountThread countRunnable1 =
new CountThread( "Thread 1" );
CountThread countRunnable2 =
new CountThread( "Thread 2" ); Thread countThread1 =
new Thread( CountRunnable1 ); Thread countThread2 =
new Thread( countRunnable2 );
This works because the Thread class supports a special constructor that accepts a Runnable interface. Therefore, we can create a thread based on a Runnable interface. The only method that the interface defines is run().
start() and run()
By calling a Thread object's start() method a Java application tells the JVM to start a separate thread of execution. The JVM will only allow a Thread object to create a single thread of execution for the lifetime of the object. Subsequent calls to an object's start() method will be ignored if the thread associated with the object has terminated; otherwise, the JVM will cause the start() method to throw illegalThreadStateException.
Once the JVM sets up the separate thread of execution it will call the object's run() method from within the newly created thread. The run() method of a Java Thread is like the thread's "main" method. Once started by the JVM, the thread exists until the run() method terminates.
The stop() method is used to stop the execution of a thread before its run() method terminates.
However, the use of stop() is discouraged because it will not always stop a thread. The stop() method is a synchronized method and as such will not stop other synchronized method blocks. This means that a deadlocked thread can't be stopped, which isn't very useful. Synchronized methods are discussed in the section on monitors.
The best way to stop a thread is to let the run() method exit gracefully by using proper synchronization techniques like the ones that follow.
Join is a simple synchronization mechanism that allows one thread to wait for another to finish. In the Basic Thread example, the main application waits for the threads that it started to finish. Note that the order in which threads are joined is not important.
Writing multi-threaded applications usually involves much more than just starting and stopping threads. Usually some form of thread synchronization is required at key points in time. There are two main types of synchronization that Java supports: Monitors and Mutexes.
The term monitor comes from the monolithic monitor (more commonly known today as a kernel) found in operating systems. A fundamental responsibility of an operating system is to protect system resources from unrestricted access, much like a monitor protects the internal data and methods of an object from unrestricted access by other threads.
Each Java object has a monitor and only one thread at a time has access to that monitor. When more than one thread wants access to an object's monitor, they must wait until that monitor is released. Notice that the Thread object itself has nothing to do with implementing monitors. Monitors are inherent in every Java object, and every Java object has its own independent monitor.
Java defines the keyword "synchronized" to gain access to an object's monitor. There are two ways to use synchronize: either by method or by block.
To allow only one thread at a time to access an object's method, use the "synchronized" keyword in the definition of the method.
public synchronized void sem_wait( String currentThreadName )
// Statements here are under protection of the object"s monitor.
// Each instance of the object will allow only one thread at a time access to the method.
To allow only one thread at a time access to a portion of an object's method, use the block form of synchronized within the method (see Listing 5).
Notice that the block form of "synchronized" takes an object as a parameter. The monitor associated with the given object is used to perform the synchronization.
Although we can specify individual methods and blocks to be synchronized, there is still only a single monitor per object. Once a thread enters a synchronized section of an object it has acquired that object's monitor. Since the object's monitor is now acquired, all other threads trying to acquire that monitor will have to wait until it is released. The monitor will be released when the one thread that entered the object's synchronized section leaves the section.
While a thread has acquired an object's monitor, it will immediately succeed in subsequent attempts to acquire that same object's monitor. This makes sense because the purpose of monitors is to allow only a single thread access to some section of code. Since the thread already has access to the monitor it is safe to let that thread execute the code. This is very useful because it means that an object's synchronized methods may call each other without fear of delay or deadlocking.
If for some reason a thread acquires an object's monitor and doesn't release it, the waiting threads will wait "forever". This is called a deadlock and can occur very easily. Deadlocks can be hard to find in code and may not show up under testing depending on the timing of the threads. It is recommended that a monitor be used to protect only what is absolutely necessary for correct behavior. Use the synchronized block mechanism to limit the scope of the monitor. In addition, don't call any methods within a synchronized block except the class Object methods (wait, notify,). This will greatly reduce the chances of deadlocks.
Remember that monitors are based on objects so be careful when using references to objects. Each reference to an object uses the monitor of the object being referenced.
One complexity of monitors is that static methods may also be synchronized. However, a static method is not associated with an object. To handle this, all static synchronized methods of a class share a single monitor that works independently of an object's monitor. When a synchronized method calls a static synchronized method, it must acquire another monitor (the one associated with all static synchronized methods of the class).
Mutexes are used when two or more threads can't interleave certain types of operations. Thus, one sequence must be completed before the other is started. The join() method, used in the Basic Thread example, was a simple fixed use mutex that waits for the thread being joined to stop.
The generic mutex methods: wait(), notify() and notifyAll() are available to all Java objects because they are declared in the Object Java class. These methods allow any thread to wait for any other thread to complete some activity. When the activity is complete, the thread notifies one (or all if notifyAll is called) waiting threads.
The thread that calls an object's wait() method will be suspended and any monitors the thread had acquired will be released. The thread will remain suspended until it is notified and the monitors needed by the thread can be reacquired.
In order for a thread to call an object's wait() method, it must own the object's monitor.
notify() and notifyAll()
A thread calls an object's notify() method when it wants to let a thread waiting on that object know that some activity has been completed. A waiting thread will be awakened and put back in the queue of running threads. However, the awakened thread still has to reacquire all monitors that it released when it called wait().
The thread that calls an object's notify() or notifyAll() method must have possession of the object's monitor.
When notifyAll() is called, all threads that are currently waiting on the object's monitor will be a awakened.
One of the problems with Java Mutexes is that notify will only wake up threads that are currently waiting. This can cause synchronization headaches because one must make sure that a thread waits before notify is called. In other words, the notification is lost when there is no one waiting. While not directly supported by Java, a semaphore can be emulated to solve this problem.
Just like mutexes, semaphores are used when two or more threads can't interleave certain types of operations. Thus, one sequence must be completed before the other is started. However, a semaphore contains more state information that allows it to overcome the limitations of Java mutexes.
We can emulate the most common form of semaphore, called a blocked-set semaphore, by using monitors and mutexes. The blocked-set semaphore has the following definition shown in Listing 4. A single thread awakens one suspended thread.
See the example Semaphore.java for an implementation of this semaphore.
Notice that we will only call notify() if we have first done a wait(), and we will remember when we called sem_signal() without wait() being called.
Putting it all Together
One of the classic concurrent programming problems is the producer/consumer problem. It involves two threads: one producer thread and one consumer thread. Take a look at the producer/consumer example.
The producer produces integer numbers and prints a message that states an integer was produced. The consumer consumes an integer number, supplied by the producer, and prints a message that states an integer was consumed. When the consumer receives the product (number) 0 it knows the producer is done and quits.
A small integer item buffer is used so that the producer can make multiple products without having to wait for the consumer to consume them.
The example just produces integer numbers to keep the example concise. However, the producer/consumer principle can be used to solve many real world problems. A producer could search for files and produce found filenames to a consumer window. A producer could do database queries that send results to a report window. There are countless concurrency problems that may be solved with this technique.
Java developers not only get a great object-oriented language, but also get a language that supports multi-threading. However, just like good object-oriented development requires a different way of thinking, good threaded programming requires a different way of thinking - with the rewards just as great.
Be creative and remember that all aspects of Java can be threaded to solve everyday problems: Windowing interfaces (AWT), saving and loading files (File I/O) and reusable components (Beansª).
M. Ben-Ari, "Principles of Concurrent and Distributed Programming", Prentice Hall, New York, 1990.
S. Oaks & H. Wong, "Java Threads", O'Reilly, MA 1997
I recently attended and was a speaker at the 4th International Internet of @ThingsExpo at the Santa Clara Convention Center. I also had the opportunity to attend this event last year and I wrote a blog from that show talking about how the “Enterprise Impact of IoT” was a key theme of last year’s show. I was curious to see if the same theme would still resonate 365 days later and what, if any, changes I would see in the content presented.
Nov. 29, 2015 01:00 AM EST Reads: 433
Cloud computing delivers on-demand resources that provide businesses with flexibility and cost-savings. The challenge in moving workloads to the cloud has been the cost and complexity of ensuring the initial and ongoing security and regulatory (PCI, HIPAA, FFIEC) compliance across private and public clouds. Manual security compliance is slow, prone to human error, and represents over 50% of the cost of managing cloud applications. Determining how to automate cloud security compliance is critical to maintaining positive ROI. Raxak Protect is an automated security compliance SaaS platform and ma...
Nov. 28, 2015 08:00 PM EST Reads: 430
The Internet of Things (IoT) is growing rapidly by extending current technologies, products and networks. By 2020, Cisco estimates there will be 50 billion connected devices. Gartner has forecast revenues of over $300 billion, just to IoT suppliers. Now is the time to figure out how you’ll make money – not just create innovative products. With hundreds of new products and companies jumping into the IoT fray every month, there’s no shortage of innovation. Despite this, McKinsey/VisionMobile data shows "less than 10 percent of IoT developers are making enough to support a reasonably sized team....
Nov. 28, 2015 01:00 PM EST Reads: 479
Just over a week ago I received a long and loud sustained applause for a presentation I delivered at this year’s Cloud Expo in Santa Clara. I was extremely pleased with the turnout and had some very good conversations with many of the attendees. Over the next few days I had many more meaningful conversations and was not only happy with the results but also learned a few new things. Here is everything I learned in those three days distilled into three short points.
Nov. 28, 2015 12:00 PM EST Reads: 338
With major technology companies and startups seriously embracing IoT strategies, now is the perfect time to attend @ThingsExpo 2016 in New York and Silicon Valley. Learn what is going on, contribute to the discussions, and ensure that your enterprise is as "IoT-Ready" as it can be! Internet of @ThingsExpo, taking place Nov 3-5, 2015, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA, is co-located with 17th Cloud Expo and will feature technical sessions from a rock star conference faculty and the leading industry players in the world. The Internet of Things (IoT) is the most profound cha...
Nov. 28, 2015 12:00 PM EST Reads: 553
DevOps is about increasing efficiency, but nothing is more inefficient than building the same application twice. However, this is a routine occurrence with enterprise applications that need both a rich desktop web interface and strong mobile support. With recent technological advances from Isomorphic Software and others, rich desktop and tuned mobile experiences can now be created with a single codebase – without compromising functionality, performance or usability. In his session at DevOps Summit, Charles Kendrick, CTO and Chief Architect at Isomorphic Software, demonstrated examples of com...
Nov. 28, 2015 11:45 AM EST Reads: 407
As organizations realize the scope of the Internet of Things, gaining key insights from Big Data, through the use of advanced analytics, becomes crucial. However, IoT also creates the need for petabyte scale storage of data from millions of devices. A new type of Storage is required which seamlessly integrates robust data analytics with massive scale. These storage systems will act as “smart systems” provide in-place analytics that speed discovery and enable businesses to quickly derive meaningful and actionable insights. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Paul Turner, Chief Marketing Officer at...
Nov. 28, 2015 11:15 AM EST Reads: 417
In his keynote at @ThingsExpo, Chris Matthieu, Director of IoT Engineering at Citrix and co-founder and CTO of Octoblu, focused on building an IoT platform and company. He provided a behind-the-scenes look at Octoblu’s platform, business, and pivots along the way (including the Citrix acquisition of Octoblu).
Nov. 28, 2015 11:00 AM EST Reads: 517
In his General Session at 17th Cloud Expo, Bruce Swann, Senior Product Marketing Manager for Adobe Campaign, explored the key ingredients of cross-channel marketing in a digital world. Learn how the Adobe Marketing Cloud can help marketers embrace opportunities for personalized, relevant and real-time customer engagement across offline (direct mail, point of sale, call center) and digital (email, website, SMS, mobile apps, social networks, connected objects).
Nov. 28, 2015 10:30 AM EST Reads: 315
We all know that data growth is exploding and storage budgets are shrinking. Instead of showing you charts on about how much data there is, in his General Session at 17th Cloud Expo, Scott Cleland, Senior Director of Product Marketing at HGST, showed how to capture all of your data in one place. After you have your data under control, you can then analyze it in one place, saving time and resources.
Nov. 28, 2015 10:00 AM EST Reads: 199
Two weeks ago (November 3-5), I attended the Cloud Expo Silicon Valley as a speaker, where I presented on the security and privacy due diligence requirements for cloud solutions. Cloud security is a topical issue for every CIO, CISO, and technology buyer. Decision-makers are always looking for insights on how to mitigate the security risks of implementing and using cloud solutions. Based on the presentation topics covered at the conference, as well as the general discussions heard between sessions, I wanted to share some of my observations on emerging trends. As cyber security serves as a fou...
Nov. 28, 2015 08:45 AM EST Reads: 332
The Internet of Everything is re-shaping technology trends–moving away from “request/response” architecture to an “always-on” Streaming Web where data is in constant motion and secure, reliable communication is an absolute necessity. As more and more THINGS go online, the challenges that developers will need to address will only increase exponentially. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Todd Greene, Founder & CEO of PubNub, exploreed the current state of IoT connectivity and review key trends and technology requirements that will drive the Internet of Things from hype to reality.
Nov. 28, 2015 08:45 AM EST Reads: 441
With all the incredible momentum behind the Internet of Things (IoT) industry, it is easy to forget that not a single CEO wakes up and wonders if “my IoT is broken.” What they wonder is if they are making the right decisions to do all they can to increase revenue, decrease costs, and improve customer experience – effectively the same challenges they have always had in growing their business. The exciting thing about the IoT industry is now these decisions can be better, faster, and smarter. Now all corporate assets – people, objects, and spaces – can share information about themselves and thei...
Nov. 28, 2015 06:00 AM EST Reads: 254
Continuous processes around the development and deployment of applications are both impacted by -- and a benefit to -- the Internet of Things trend. To help better understand the relationship between DevOps and a plethora of new end-devices and data please welcome Gary Gruver, consultant, author and a former IT executive who has led many large-scale IT transformation projects, and John Jeremiah, Technology Evangelist at Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE), on Twitter at @j_jeremiah. The discussion is moderated by me, Dana Gardner, Principal Analyst at Interarbor Solutions.
Nov. 28, 2015 05:30 AM EST Reads: 735
Too often with compelling new technologies market participants become overly enamored with that attractiveness of the technology and neglect underlying business drivers. This tendency, what some call the “newest shiny object syndrome” is understandable given that virtually all of us are heavily engaged in technology. But it is also mistaken. Without concrete business cases driving its deployment, IoT, like many other technologies before it, will fade into obscurity.
Nov. 28, 2015 05:00 AM EST Reads: 365
Discussions of cloud computing have evolved in recent years from a focus on specific types of cloud, to a world of hybrid cloud, and to a world dominated by the APIs that make today's multi-cloud environments and hybrid clouds possible. In this Power Panel at 17th Cloud Expo, moderated by Conference Chair Roger Strukhoff, panelists addressed the importance of customers being able to use the specific technologies they need, through environments and ecosystems that expose their APIs to make true change and transformation possible.
Nov. 28, 2015 04:00 AM EST Reads: 543
The Internet of Things is clearly many things: data collection and analytics, wearables, Smart Grids and Smart Cities, the Industrial Internet, and more. Cool platforms like Arduino, Raspberry Pi, Intel's Galileo and Edison, and a diverse world of sensors are making the IoT a great toy box for developers in all these areas. In this Power Panel at @ThingsExpo, moderated by Conference Chair Roger Strukhoff, panelists discussed what things are the most important, which will have the most profound effect on the world, and what should we expect to see over the next couple of years.
Nov. 28, 2015 03:30 AM EST Reads: 478
Microservices are a very exciting architectural approach that many organizations are looking to as a way to accelerate innovation. Microservices promise to allow teams to move away from monolithic "ball of mud" systems, but the reality is that, in the vast majority of organizations, different projects and technologies will continue to be developed at different speeds. How to handle the dependencies between these disparate systems with different iteration cycles? Consider the "canoncial problem" in this scenario: microservice A (releases daily) depends on a couple of additions to backend B (re...
Nov. 28, 2015 03:00 AM EST Reads: 453
The cloud. Like a comic book superhero, there seems to be no problem it can’t fix or cost it can’t slash. Yet making the transition is not always easy and production environments are still largely on premise. Taking some practical and sensible steps to reduce risk can also help provide a basis for a successful cloud transition. A plethora of surveys from the likes of IDG and Gartner show that more than 70 percent of enterprises have deployed at least one or more cloud application or workload. Yet a closer inspection at the data reveals less than half of these cloud projects involve production...
Nov. 28, 2015 03:00 AM EST Reads: 485
Growth hacking is common for startups to make unheard-of progress in building their business. Career Hacks can help Geek Girls and those who support them (yes, that's you too, Dad!) to excel in this typically male-dominated world. Get ready to learn the facts: Is there a bias against women in the tech / developer communities? Why are women 50% of the workforce, but hold only 24% of the STEM or IT positions? Some beginnings of what to do about it! In her Day 2 Keynote at 17th Cloud Expo, Sandy Carter, IBM General Manager Cloud Ecosystem and Developers, and a Social Business Evangelist, wil...
Nov. 28, 2015 02:00 AM EST Reads: 583