Welcome!

Java Authors: Trevor Parsons, Carmen Gonzalez, Peter Silva, Elizabeth White, Rex Morrow, Datical

Related Topics: Java

Java: Article

XML Serialization of Java Objects

XML Serialization of Java Objects

Java serialization was initially used to support remote method invocation (RMI), allowing argument objects to be passed between two virtual machines.

RMI works best when the two VMs contain compatible versions of the class being transmitted, and can reliably transmit a binary representation of the object based on its internal state. When an object is serialized, it must also serialize the objects to which its fields refer - resulting in what is commonly called an object graph of connected components. Although the transient keyword can be used to control the extent to which the serialization process penetrates the object graph, this level of control is seldom enough.

Many have tried to use Java's serialization to achieve the so-called "long-term persistence" of data - where the serialized form of a Java data structure is written to a file for later use. One such area is the development tools domain, in which designs must be saved for later use. Because the logic that saves and restores serialized objects is based on the internal structure of the constituent classes, any changes to those classes between the time that the object was saved and when it was retrieved may cause the deserialization process to fail outright; for example, a field was added or removed, existing fields were renamed or reordered, or the class's superclass or package was altered. Such changes are to be expected during the development process, and any mechanism that relies on the internal structure of all classes being identical between versions to work has the odds stacked against it. Over the last few years the "versioning issues" associated with Java's serialization mechanism have indeed proved to be insurmountable and have led to widespread abandonment of Java's serialization as a viable long-term persistence strategy in the development tools space.

To tackle Java serialization problems, a Java Specification Request (JSR 57) was created, titled "Long-Term Persistence for JavaBeans." JSR 57 is included in JRE 1.4 and is part of the "java.beans" package. This article describes the mechanism with which the JSR solved the problems of long-term persistence, and how you can take control of the way that the XMLEncoder generates archives to represent the data in your application.

We'll start our section by dispelling two popular myths that have grown up around XML serialization: that it can only be used for JavaBeans and that all JavaBeans are GUI widgets. In fact, the XMLEncoder can support any public Java class; these classes don't have to be JavaBeans and they certainly don't have to be GUI widgets. The only constraint that the encoder places on the classes it can archive is that there must be a means to create and configure each instance through public method calls. If the class implements the getter/setter paradigm of the JavaBeans specification, the encoder can acheive its goal automatically - even for a class it knows nothing about. On top of this default behavior, the XMLEncoder comes with a small but very powerful API that allows it to be "taught" how to save instances of any class - even if they don't use any of the JavaBeans design patterns. In fact, most of the Swing classes deviate from the JavaBeans specification in some way and yet the XMLEncoder handles them via a set of rules with which it comes preconfigured. The XMLEcoder is currently spec'ed to provide automatic support for all subclasses of Component in the SDK and all of their property types (recursively). This means that as well as being able to serialize all of AWT and Swing GUI widgets, the XMLEncoder can also serialize: primitive values (int, double, etc.), strings, dates, arrays, lists, hashtables (including all Collection classes), and many other classes that you might not think of as having anything to do with JavaBeans. The support for all these classes is not "hard-wired" into the XMLEncoder; instead it is provided to the Encoder through the API that it exposes for general use. The variety in the APIs among even the small subset of classes mentioned earlier should give some idea of the generality and scope of the persistence techniques we will cover in the next sections.

Background
When problems are encountered with an object stream, they're hard to correct because the format is binary. An XML document is human readable, and therefore easier for a user to examine and manipulate when problems arise. To serialize objects to an XML document, use the class java.beans.XMLEncoder; to read objects, use the class java.beans.XMLDecoder.

One reason object streams are brittle is that they rely on the internal shape of the class remaining unchanged between encoding and decoding. The XMLEncoder takes a completely different approach here: instead of storing a bit-wise representation of the field values that make up an object's state, the XMLEncoder stores the steps necessary to create the object through its public API. There are two key factors that make XML files written this way remarkably robust when compared with their serialized counterparts.

First, many changes to a class's internal implementation can be made while preserving backward compatibility in its public APIs. In public libraries, this is often a requirement of new releases - as breaking a committed public API would break all the third-party code that had used the library in its older form. As a result of this, many software vendors have internal policies that prevent its developers from knowingly "breaking" any of the public APIs in new releases. While exceptions inevitably arise, they are on a much, much smaller scale than the internal changes that are made to the private implementations of the classes within the library. In this way, the XMLDecoder derives much of its resilience to versioning by aligning its requirements with those of developers who program against APIs directly.

The second reason for the stability of the decoding process as implemented by the XMLDecoder is just as important. If you were to take an instance of any class, choose an arbitrary member variable, and set it to null - the behavior of that instance would be completely undefined in all subsequent operations - and a bug-free implementation would be entitled to fail catastrophically under these circumstances. This is exactly what happens when a field is added to a new version of a class and this causes people to cross their fingers when trying to deserialize an instance of a class that was written out with an older version. The XMLEncoder, by contrast, doesn't store a list of private fields but a program that represents the object's state. Here's an XML file representing a window with the title "Test":

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<java version="1.4.1" class="java.beans.XMLDecoder">
<object class="javax.swing.JFrame">
<void property="title">
<string>Test</string>
</void>
<void property="visible">
<boolean>true<boolean/>
</void>
</object>
</java>

XML archives, written by XMLEncoder, have exactly the same information as a Java program - they're just written using an XML encoding rather than a Java one. Here's what the above program would look like in Java:

JFrame f = new JFrame();
f.setTitle("Test");
f.setVisible(true);

When a backward compatibility issue arises in one of the classes in the archive, it may cause one of the earlier statements to fail. A new version of the class might, for example, choose not to define the "setTitle()" method. When this happens, the XMLDecoder detects that this method is now missing from the class and doesn't try to call it. Instead, it issues a warning, ignores the offending statement, and continues with the other statements in the file. The critical point is that not calling the "setTitle()" method does not violate the contract of the implementation (as deleting an instance variable would), and the resulting instance should be a valid and fully functional Java object. If the resulting Java object fails in any way, an ordinary Java program could be written against its API to demonstrate a genuine bug in its implementation.

The vendors of popular Java libraries tend to devote significant resources toward programs to manage demonstrable bugs of this kind and enlist the support of the development community to work toward their eradication - Sun's "BugParade" is a well-known example. As a result of these kinds of programs, bugs that can be demonstrated by simple "setup code" tend to be rare in mature libraries. Once again, the XMLDecoder benefits here as it's able to ride on the coattails of the Java developer by using the public APIs of the classes instead of relying on special privileges to circumvent them.

Encoding of JavaBeans
To illustrate the XMLEncoder, this article shows serialization based on a number of scenarios using an example Person class. These range from simple JavaBeans encoding through nondefault construction and custom initialization.

In the simplest scenario, the class Person has String fields for firstName and lastName, together with get and set methods.

public class Person {
private String firstName;
private String lastName;
public String getFirstName() { return firstName; }
public String getLastName() { return lastName; }
public void setFirstName(String str) { firstName = str; }
public void setLastName(String str) { lastName = str; }
}

The following code creates an encoder and serializes a Person.

FileOutputStream os = new FileOutputStream("C:/cust.xml");
XMLEncoder encoder = new XMLEncoder(os);
Person p = new Person();
p.setFirstName("John");
encoder.writeObject(p);
encoder.close();

The XML file created shows that Person class has been encoded, and that its firstName property is the string "John".

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<java version="1.4.1" class="java.beans.XMLDecoder">
<object class="Person">
<void property="firstName">
<string>John</string>
</void>
</object>
</java>

When the file is decoded with the XMLDecoder, the Person class will be instantiated with its default constructor, and the firstName property set by calling the method setFirstName("John").

FileInputStream os = new FileInputStream("C:/cust.xml");
XMLDecoder decoder = new XMLDecoder(os);
Person p = (Person)decoder.readObject();
decoder.close();

To understand how to leverage the encoder and decoder for custom serialization requires an understanding of the JavaBeans component model. This describes a class's interface in terms of a set of properties, each of which can have a get and set method. To determine the set of operations required to re-create an object, the XMLEncoder creates a prototype instance using its default constructor and then compares the value of each property between this and the object being serialized. If any of the values don't match, the encoder adds it to the graph of objects to be serialized, and so on until it has a complete set of the objects and properties required to re-create the original object being serialized. When the encoder reaches objects that can't be broken down any further, such as Java's strings, ints, or doubles, it writes these values directly to the XML document as tag values. For a complete list of these primitive values and their associated tags, see http://java.sun.com/products/jfc/tsc/ articles/persistence3/index.html.

To serialize an object, XMLEncoder uses the Strategy pattern, and delegates the logic to an instance of java.beans.PersistenceDelegate. The persistence delegate is given the object being serialized and is responsible for determining which API methods can be used to re-create the same instance in the VM in which it will be decoded. The XMLEncoder then executes the API to create the prototype instance that it gives to the delegate, together with the original object being serialized, so the delegate can determine the API methods to re-create the nondefault state.

The method XMLEncoder.setPersistenceDelegate(Class objectClass, PersistenceDelegate delegate) is used to set a customized delegate for an object class. To illustrate this we'll change the original Person class so that it no longer conforms to the standard JavaBeans model, and show how persistence delegates can be used to teach the XMLEncoder to successfully serialize each instance.

Constructor Arguments
One of the patterns that can be taught to the XMLEncoder is how to create an instance where there is no zero-argument constructor. The following is an example of this in which a Person must be constructed with its firstName and lastName as arguments.

public Person(String aFirstName, String aLastName){
firstName = aFirstName;
firstName = aLastName;
}

In the absence of any customized delegate, the XMLEncoder uses the class java.beans.DefaultPersistenceDelegate. This expects the instance to conform to the JavaBeans component model with a zero-argument constructor and JavaBeans properties controlling its state. For the Person whose property values are supplied as constructor arguments, an instance of DefaultPersistenceDelegate can be created with the list of property names that represent the constructor arguments.

XMLEncoder e = new XMLEncoder(os);
Person p = new Person("John","Smith");
e.setPersistenceDelegate(Person.class,
new DefaultPersistenceDelegate(
new String[] { "firstName","lastName"}
);
e.writeObject(person);

When the XMLEncoder creates the XML for the Person object, it uses the supplied instance of the DefaultPersistenceDelegate, queries the values of the firstName and lastProperties, and creates the following XML document.

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<java version="1.4.1" class="java.beans.XMLDecoder">
<object class="Person">
<string>John</string>
<string>Smith</string>
</object>
</java>

The result is a record of the Object's state but written in such a way that the XMLDecoder can locate and call the public constructor of the Person object just as a Java program would. In the previous XML document where the Person was a standard JavaBeans component, the nondefault properties were specified with named <void property="propertyName"> tags that contained the argument values.

Although custom encoding rules can be supplied to the XMLEncoder, this is not true of the XMLDecoder. The XML document represents the API steps to re-create the serialized objects in a target VM. One advantage of not having custom decoder rules is that only the environment that serializes the objects requires customization, whereas the target environment just requires the classes with unchanged APIs. This makes it ideal for the following scenario - serialization of an object graph within a development tool that has access to design-time customization, where the XML document will be read in a runtime environment that does not have access to the persistence delegates used during encoding.

Custom Instantiation
In addition to a class being constructed with property values as arguments, custom instantiation can include use of factory methods. An example of this would be if Person's constructor were package protected and instances of the Person class could only be created by calling a static createPerson() method defined in a PersonFactory class.

To write a persistence delegate requires a basic understanding of how the encoder creates its set of operations that will re-create the serialized objects when the stream is deserialized. The XMLEncoder uses the command pattern to record each of the required method calls as instances of the class java.beans.Statement. Each Statement represents an API call in which a method is sent to a target, together with any arguments. Commands that are responsible for the instantiation of objects are instances of java.beans.Expression. A subclass of Statement returns a value. Each object in the graph is represented by the Expression that creates it and a set of Statements that are used to initialize it.

For general control of instantiation, a subclass of the PersistenceDelegate class should be created with a specialized instantiate() method. The return value is the java.beans.Expression that indicates to the encoder which method or constructor should be used to create (or retrieve) the object. The returned Expression includes the object, the target (normally the class that defines the constructor), the method name (normally the fake name "new," which indicates a constructor call), and the argument values that the method or constructor takes.

The first argument of the instantiate() method is the instance of the Person object being serialized, and the second object is the encoder (see Listing 1).

When the XMLEncoder serializes the Person instance, instead of the DefaultPersistenceDelegate that uses standard JavaBeans rules for properties, it uses the anonymous inner class we registered as the persistence delegate of the Person.class. The resulting XML follows. In the <object> tag as well as the class name, the static method createPerson has also been included, and the arguments are specified as child tags.

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<java version="1.4.1" class="java.beans.XMLDecoder">
<object class="PersonFactory" method="createPerson">
<string>Smith</string>
<void property="firstName">
<string>John</string>
</void>
</object>
</java>

The inner class created for the Person persistence delegate subclasses from DefaultPersistenceDelegate, so the firstName property value of "John" is included in the XML document; however, no property tag is included for lastName. This is because the XMLEncoder compares the prototype instance of Person against the instance being serialized to determine which property values are not their default and need to be included in the XML document. The method that does this is protected void initialize(Class type, Object oldInstance, Object newInstance, Encoder out). The oldInstance argument is the object being serialized and the newInstance is the prototype. Because the prototype instance is created using the Expression returned by the persistence delegate's method protected Expression instantiate(Object oldInstance, Encoder encoder), the newInstance argument will already have the lastName set to be the same as the oldInstance so the encoder won't see their values as different and hence it does not serialize a property value for the lastName.

Custom State
The DefaultPersistenceDelegate assumes that the state of the oldInstance can be determined and restored by using the JavaBeans component model for properties. The list of properties for a class is retrieved using the method java.beans.Introspector.getBeanInfo(ClassaClass).getPropertyDescriptors(). Each property is an instance of java.beans.PropertyDescriptor and includes a get and set method. The Introspector uses a set of rules matching method name pairs to create properties, although these rules can be overridden by supplying a specific BeanInfo class. The BeanInfo class can use a different set of methods than those that the introspector would otherwise have determined as the property's get and set method. However, it can't deal with scenarios in which there is no get and set method, for example. For these the persistence delegate needs to be customized, and as an example we will have a property called nicknames that is multivalued.

private List nicknames = new ArrayList();
public void addNickname(String name){nicknames.add(name); }
public List getNicknames(){return nicknames; }

Nicknames are added to the class one at a time using the addNickname() method, and the complete list is retrieved using getNicknames(). The decoder needs to iterate through the nicknames and create an archive that uses the addNickname() method to re-create the Person.

The persistence delegate will subclass DefaultPersistenceDelegate that assumes construction of the class through a default Person, and will override the instantiate() method that's responsible for determining the expressions required to re-create the oldInstance (see Listing 2).

The persistence delegate iterates through the nicknames and for each one adds a statement to the encoder that specifies the API to re-create the nickname. For this the Statement includes the target of the method (the Person oldInstance), the method name (addNickname), and the arguments (the nickname) (see Listing 3).

Specifying Delegates in BeanInfo Classes
In the examples used so far the custom persistence delegate was set directly onto the XMLEncoder by calling the method setPersistenceDelegate(Class,PersistenceDelegate). This works if you're the author of the code that's responsible for performing the serialization, but in some scenarios another piece of software such as an IDE tool is responsible for encoding the JavaBeans. In this situation you must teach the tool about the delegate that it should use for your class; this is done by specifying the delegate class name in the BeanDescriptor for a string key of "persistenceDelegate". For example, if the Person class is going to be introduced into an IDE together with PersonBeanInfo, the getBeanDescriptor() method would be specialized.

public class PersonBeanInfo extends SimpleBeanInfo {
public BeanDescriptor getBeanDescriptor(){
BeanDescriptor result = new BeanDescriptor(Person.class);
result.setValue("persistenceDelegate", PersonPersistenceDelegate.class);
return result;
}
}

If the PersonBeanInfo is not in the same package as the Person class, the search path of the Introspector in the tool will need to be updated to include the BeanInfo's package.

Another way in which BeanInfo classes can be used to leverage persistence is by marking properties as transient. When DefaultPersistenceDelegate is responsible for encoding the JavaBean, it looks at all the available read/write properties and compares the existing values on the object being serialized against the values on the prototype instance. To flag a property so that it will be ignored, the key "transient" should be set to the value Boolean.TRUE. For example, if the "firstName" property should be considered transient, the getPropertyDescriptors() method on PersonBeanInfo could be specialized as shown in Listing 4.

Conclusion
This article explained how the design of the XMLEncoder avoids many of the fundamental pitfalls of binary serialization and makes the case that XML archives produced by the XMLEncoder can be trusted as a reliable means to store valuable data over the long term. Central to the design of the XMLEncoder is the java.beans.DefaultPersistenceDelegate class, which provides a default serialization strategy based on the idea of properties as laid out in a JavaBeans component model.

We show how custom delegates can be submitted to the encoder to teach it about idioms other than those of the JavaBeans component model, so classes that don't follow the JavaBeans conventions can be accommodated without changing their APIs. Because, in all cases, the decoder inflates object graphs using public API calls; deserialization is remarkably robust in the face of changes made to the classes referred to in the archives. If you need to save some critical data in your application to a file and are not interested in designing a new file format and coding the readers and writers for it - check out the XMLEncoder/XMLDecoder to see if they'll do it all for you.

References

  • Using XML Encoder on the Swing Connection: http://java.sun.com/products/jfc/tsc/ articles/persistence4/index.html
  • JavaBeans: http://java.sun.com/products/javabeans/
  • More Stories By Joe Winchester

    Joe Winchester, Editor-in-Chief of Java Developer's Journal, was formerly JDJ's longtime Desktop Technologies Editor and is a software developer working on development tools for IBM in Hursley, UK.

    More Stories By Philip Milne

    Philip Milne is a software developer who worked at Sun as part of the Swing development team, and now works as a consultant in London, UK. He can be contacted at [email protected]

    Comments (1) View Comments

    Share your thoughts on this story.

    Add your comment
    You must be signed in to add a comment. Sign-in | Register

    In accordance with our Comment Policy, we encourage comments that are on topic, relevant and to-the-point. We will remove comments that include profanity, personal attacks, racial slurs, threats of violence, or other inappropriate material that violates our Terms and Conditions, and will block users who make repeated violations. We ask all readers to expect diversity of opinion and to treat one another with dignity and respect.


    Most Recent Comments
    koundinya75 04/23/09 01:20:00 AM EDT

    This is nice presentation on XML serialization.

    I wonder how we can serialize the Composite Objects.

    For ex: If I have Department instance associated with Employee instance then Frameworks like JAXB or CASTOR are able to do right marshalling. But I am not seeing the same with XML serialization. Could you share some of your thoughts on this?

    @ThingsExpo Stories
    Software AG helps organizations transform into Digital Enterprises, so they can differentiate from competitors and better engage customers, partners and employees. Using the Software AG Suite, companies can close the gap between business and IT to create digital systems of differentiation that drive front-line agility. We offer four on-ramps to the Digital Enterprise: alignment through collaborative process analysis; transformation through portfolio management; agility through process automation and integration; and visibility through intelligent business operations and big data.
    There will be 50 billion Internet connected devices by 2020. Today, every manufacturer has a propriety protocol and an app. How do we securely integrate these "things" into our lives and businesses in a way that we can easily control and manage? Even better, how do we integrate these "things" so that they control and manage each other so our lives become more convenient or our businesses become more profitable and/or safe? We have heard that the best interface is no interface. In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, Chris Matthieu, Co-Founder & CTO at Octoblu, Inc., will discuss how these devices generate enough data to learn our behaviors and simplify/improve our lives. What if we could connect everything to everything? I'm not only talking about connecting things to things but also systems, cloud services, and people. Add in a little machine learning and artificial intelligence and now we have something interesting...
    Last week, while in San Francisco, I used the Uber app and service four times. All four experiences were great, although one of the drivers stopped for 30 seconds and then left as I was walking up to the car. He must have realized I was a blogger. None the less, the next car was just a minute away and I suffered no pain. In this article, my colleague, Ved Sen, Global Head, Advisory Services Social, Mobile and Sensors at Cognizant shares his experiences and insights.
    We are reaching the end of the beginning with WebRTC and real systems using this technology have begun to appear. One challenge that faces every WebRTC deployment (in some form or another) is identity management. For example, if you have an existing service – possibly built on a variety of different PaaS/SaaS offerings – and you want to add real-time communications you are faced with a challenge relating to user management, authentication, authorization, and validation. Service providers will want to use their existing identities, but these will have credentials already that are (hopefully) irreversibly encoded. In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, Peter Dunkley, Technical Director at Acision, will look at how this identity problem can be solved and discuss ways to use existing web identities for real-time communication.
    Can call centers hang up the phones for good? Intuitive Solutions did. WebRTC enabled this contact center provider to eliminate antiquated telephony and desktop phone infrastructure with a pure web-based solution, allowing them to expand beyond brick-and-mortar confines to a home-based agent model. It also ensured scalability and better service for customers, including MUY! Companies, one of the country's largest franchise restaurant companies with 232 Pizza Hut locations. This is one example of WebRTC adoption today, but the potential is limitless when powered by IoT. Attendees will learn real-world benefits of WebRTC and explore future possibilities, as WebRTC and IoT intersect to improve customer service.
    From telemedicine to smart cars, digital homes and industrial monitoring, the explosive growth of IoT has created exciting new business opportunities for real time calls and messaging. In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, Ivelin Ivanov, CEO and Co-Founder of Telestax, will share some of the new revenue sources that IoT created for Restcomm – the open source telephony platform from Telestax. Ivelin Ivanov is a technology entrepreneur who founded Mobicents, an Open Source VoIP Platform, to help create, deploy, and manage applications integrating voice, video and data. He is the co-founder of TeleStax, an Open Source Cloud Communications company that helps the shift from legacy IN/SS7 telco networks to IP-based cloud comms. An early investor in multiple start-ups, he still finds time to code for his companies and contribute to open source projects.
    The Internet of Things (IoT) promises to create new business models as significant as those that were inspired by the Internet and the smartphone 20 and 10 years ago. What business, social and practical implications will this phenomenon bring? That's the subject of "Monetizing the Internet of Things: Perspectives from the Front Lines," an e-book released today and available free of charge from Aria Systems, the leading innovator in recurring revenue management.
    The Internet of Things will put IT to its ultimate test by creating infinite new opportunities to digitize products and services, generate and analyze new data to improve customer satisfaction, and discover new ways to gain a competitive advantage across nearly every industry. In order to help corporate business units to capitalize on the rapidly evolving IoT opportunities, IT must stand up to a new set of challenges.
    There’s Big Data, then there’s really Big Data from the Internet of Things. IoT is evolving to include many data possibilities like new types of event, log and network data. The volumes are enormous, generating tens of billions of logs per day, which raise data challenges. Early IoT deployments are relying heavily on both the cloud and managed service providers to navigate these challenges. In her session at 6th Big Data Expo®, Hannah Smalltree, Director at Treasure Data, to discuss how IoT, Big Data and deployments are processing massive data volumes from wearables, utilities and other machines.
    All major researchers estimate there will be tens of billions devices – computers, smartphones, tablets, and sensors – connected to the Internet by 2020. This number will continue to grow at a rapid pace for the next several decades. With major technology companies and startups seriously embracing IoT strategies, now is the perfect time to attend @ThingsExpo in Silicon Valley. Learn what is going on, contribute to the discussions, and ensure that your enterprise is as "IoT-Ready" as it can be!
    P2P RTC will impact the landscape of communications, shifting from traditional telephony style communications models to OTT (Over-The-Top) cloud assisted & PaaS (Platform as a Service) communication services. The P2P shift will impact many areas of our lives, from mobile communication, human interactive web services, RTC and telephony infrastructure, user federation, security and privacy implications, business costs, and scalability. In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, Erik Lagerway, Co-founder of Hookflash, will walk through the shifting landscape of traditional telephone and voice services to the modern P2P RTC era of OTT cloud assisted services.
    While great strides have been made relative to the video aspects of remote collaboration, audio technology has basically stagnated. Typically all audio is mixed to a single monaural stream and emanates from a single point, such as a speakerphone or a speaker associated with a video monitor. This leads to confusion and lack of understanding among participants especially regarding who is actually speaking. Spatial teleconferencing introduces the concept of acoustic spatial separation between conference participants in three dimensional space. This has been shown to significantly improve comprehension and conference efficiency.
    The Internet of Things is tied together with a thin strand that is known as time. Coincidentally, at the core of nearly all data analytics is a timestamp. When working with time series data there are a few core principles that everyone should consider, especially across datasets where time is the common boundary. In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, Jim Scott, Director of Enterprise Strategy & Architecture at MapR Technologies, will discuss single-value, geo-spatial, and log time series data. By focusing on enterprise applications and the data center, he will use OpenTSDB as an example to explain some of these concepts including when to use different storage models.
    SYS-CON Events announced today that Gridstore™, the leader in software-defined storage (SDS) purpose-built for Windows Servers and Hyper-V, will exhibit at SYS-CON's 15th International Cloud Expo®, which will take place on November 4–6, 2014, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA. Gridstore™ is the leader in software-defined storage purpose built for virtualization that is designed to accelerate applications in virtualized environments. Using its patented Server-Side Virtual Controller™ Technology (SVCT) to eliminate the I/O blender effect and accelerate applications Gridstore delivers vmOptimized™ Storage that self-optimizes to each application or VM across both virtual and physical environments. Leveraging a grid architecture, Gridstore delivers the first end-to-end storage QoS to ensure the most important App or VM performance is never compromised. The storage grid, that uses Gridstore’s performance optimized nodes or capacity optimized nodes, starts with as few a...
    The Transparent Cloud-computing Consortium (abbreviation: T-Cloud Consortium) will conduct research activities into changes in the computing model as a result of collaboration between "device" and "cloud" and the creation of new value and markets through organic data processing High speed and high quality networks, and dramatic improvements in computer processing capabilities, have greatly changed the nature of applications and made the storing and processing of data on the network commonplace. These technological reforms have not only changed computers and smartphones, but are also changing the data processing model for all information devices. In particular, in the area known as M2M (Machine-To-Machine), there are great expectations that information with a new type of value can be produced using a variety of devices and sensors saving/sharing data via the network and through large-scale cloud-type data processing. This consortium believes that attaching a huge number of devic...
    Innodisk is a service-driven provider of industrial embedded flash and DRAM storage products and technologies, with a focus on the enterprise, industrial, aerospace, and defense industries. Innodisk is dedicated to serving their customers and business partners. Quality is vitally important when it comes to industrial embedded flash and DRAM storage products. That’s why Innodisk manufactures all of their products in their own purpose-built memory production facility. In fact, they designed and built their production center to maximize manufacturing efficiency and guarantee the highest quality of our products.
    All major researchers estimate there will be tens of billions devices - computers, smartphones, tablets, and sensors - connected to the Internet by 2020. This number will continue to grow at a rapid pace for the next several decades. Over the summer Gartner released its much anticipated annual Hype Cycle report and the big news is that Internet of Things has now replaced Big Data as the most hyped technology. Indeed, we're hearing more and more about this fascinating new technological paradigm. Every other IT news item seems to be about IoT and its implications on the future of digital business.
    Can call centers hang up the phones for good? Intuitive Solutions did. WebRTC enabled this contact center provider to eliminate antiquated telephony and desktop phone infrastructure with a pure web-based solution, allowing them to expand beyond brick-and-mortar confines to a home-based agent model. Download Slide Deck: ▸ Here
    BSQUARE is a global leader of embedded software solutions. We enable smart connected systems at the device level and beyond that millions use every day and provide actionable data solutions for the growing Internet of Things (IoT) market. We empower our world-class customers with our products, services and solutions to achieve innovation and success. For more information, visit www.bsquare.com.
    With the iCloud scandal seemingly in its past, Apple announced new iPhones, updates to iPad and MacBook as well as news on OSX Yosemite. Although consumers will have to wait to get their hands on some of that new stuff, what they can get is the latest release of iOS 8 that Apple made available for most in-market iPhones and iPads. Originally announced at WWDC (Apple’s annual developers conference) in June, iOS 8 seems to spearhead Apple’s newfound focus upon greater integration of their products into everyday tasks, cross-platform mobility and self-monitoring. Before you update your device, here is a look at some of the new features and things you may want to consider from a mobile security perspective.