| By XML News Desk | Article Rating: |
|
| July 22, 2007 05:15 PM EDT | Reads: |
12,650 |
Despite the fact that V1 had only seven voting members a few months ago and 26 last Friday, the 13th, as it happens, no two-thirds consensus was reached and now INCITS' executive board is going to have to sort through the stack of V1's technical comments and come up with an American position through a 30-day letter ballot. There could also be a reconsideration ballot after that.
After the short and perhaps hurried three-hour V1 teleconference, V1 member and IBMer Rob Weir claimed on his blog that "An important factor in the V1 vote was the large number of members who joined very late in the process….There was a clear pattern in the voting where the long-time V1 members voted for the 'Disapproval, with comments' position, while the newer members voted overwhelmingly 'Yes, with comments.' This is not surprising since the new members were largely Microsoft business partners."
Of course the rival OpenDocument Format (ODF) is already an ISO standard and so its supporters like IBM, Sun and the open source community argue that one ISO standard is enough, a position that has Microsoft of all people preaching choice.
Microsoft, which can warm itself by the light of the V1 majority, needs the ISO mantle to maintain its Office franchise especially with governments demanding open standards.
Microsoft has accused IBM, which knows its way around standards, of being behind the effort to popularize ODF through government procurements.
The ISO vote is set for September 2 and the in-fighting between now and then is expected to be fierce.
Published July 22, 2007 Reads 12,650
Copyright © 2007 SYS-CON Media, Inc. — All Rights Reserved.
Syndicated stories and blog feeds, all rights reserved by the author.
About XML News Desk
The XML-Journal News Desk monitors the world of XML and SOA /Web services to present IT professionals with updates on technology advances and business trends, as well as new products and standards.
- Performance of Java Compilers: An Empirical Study
- Java Kicks Ruby on Rails in the Butt
- Ulitzer’s Amazing First 30 Days in Public Beta
- 1st Annual Government IT Expo: Call for Papers Deadline July 15
- REA Is Where RIA Becomes the Norm
- Why an Application Grid?
- Will Ulitzer Dominate News Content on The Web? -Gartner
- Clear Toolkit 4: The Road Map
- Profiling Netbeans within Amazon EC2
- Java Persistence on the Grid: Approaches to Integration
- Performance of Java Compilers: An Empirical Study
- Java Kicks Ruby on Rails in the Butt
- Developing Rich Client Applications Using Swing - II
- The Right Time for Real Time Java
- Xpress Suite Adds Automatic Java to iPhone Conversion
- Initial Thoughts on IBM Acquisition of Sun Microsystems
- Ulitzer’s Amazing First 30 Days in Public Beta
- 1st Annual Government IT Expo: Call for Papers Deadline July 15
- Maximizing Java Performance with Bespoke Programming
- Pet Store with JavaFX 1.0.- Part I
- A Cup of AJAX? Nay, Just Regular Java Please
- Java Developer's Journal Exclusive: 2006 "JDJ Editors' Choice" Awards
- The i-Technology Right Stuff
- JavaServer Faces (JSF) vs Struts
- Rich Internet Applications with Adobe Flex 2 and Java
- Java vs C++ "Shootout" Revisited
- Bean-Managed Persistence Using a Proxy List
- Reporting Made Easy with JasperReports and Hibernate
- What's New in Eclipse?
- Creating a Pet Store Application with JavaServer Faces, Spring, and Hibernate






































