Click here to close now.

Welcome!

Java Authors: Plutora Blog, Pat Romanski, XebiaLabs Blog, Max Katz, Carmen Gonzalez

Related Topics: Java

Java: Article

Clustered Timers

For Robust Scalable Systems

Often, when someone asks how we are going to scale the Web application we're about to develop, we look at them, smile, and say, "Not a problem - we'll just cluster the application servers." Clustering our application across multiple servers provides us with the ability to handle large volumes of traffic and to scale systems by adding additional servers to the cluster.

In addition to providing scalability, application clusters make the system more robust by allowing for automatic system failover when a server fails. This way when one server goes down the application continues to run, albeit with slightly decreased performance. While it is true that the current generation of application servers makes it relatively pain-free to create a cluster, there are still several significant, if often overlooked, design issues that must be taken into account now that the system is clustered.

When we run our Web application in a cluster, we have the exact same software running on each machine in the cluster. While this eliminates a host of configuration management difficulties, it does create other problems. While we don't have to write different code for every possible machine in the cluster, there are times when this simplicity actually makes things more complex; the running of scheduled tasks is typically one of these areas. Scheduled tasks are used to execute procedures that need to run at certain fixed times or at fixed intervals. Typical examples of scheduled tasks within a Web application are report-generation tasks and tasks that send data to external systems that are only available within a certain time frame.

To understand why clustering affects how we design our application to handle scheduled tasks, let's consider a generic e-commerce Web application. To allow management to analyze sales trends, profits, inventory, etc., the system has been set up to periodically compile a set of reports and e-mail them to management. Clearly, management doesn't want to receive multiple e-mails containing the same reports, yet this is what we will get if we simply write a scheduled task and then cluster our system. When the appointed time to run the report comes up, all machines in the cluster will generate the same report and send it to management. This can be seen visually in Figure 1.

Perhaps the most straightforward way to solve this problem is to package the code that runs the scheduled tasks into a separate JAR file within the EAR file that contains the WAR file for the Web application. This EAR file is deployed to all the servers in the cluster; however, the JAR containing the scheduled tasks is configured to run on only one of the servers. This solves the problem by preventing the scheduled tasks from ever running on multiple machines. However, there is a significant downside to these solutions. First, you have now created additional configuration management problems. You need to carefully track which servers are set up to run the scheduled tasks and the exact deployment procedures that were used so that when additional servers are added to the cluster, the application is properly deployed on those servers.

The second problem is that you have effectively taken the scheduled tasks out of the cluster. Now, if the machine that is set up with the scheduled tasks fails, or its connection to the network fails, there is no backup or failover system. The tasks won't run. The remainder of this article investigates solutions to this problem that allow the scheduled tasks to remain part of the cluster and don't involve additional configuration management.

To stop every system in the cluster from performing the same scheduled task, report generation in this case, we have to utilize something outside of the application server cluster to track the state of our scheduled task. A perfect candidate for maintaining the state of our scheduled tasks is a shared database, and since nearly all applications already have access to a shared database, this is the resource we will use to solve this problem in our example (see Figure 2). It's worth mentioning that while a shared database is an ideal resource for solving this problem, it's not the only option. The solution presented here could be adapted to use flat files or some other shared resource external to the cluster.

Our external resource, the database in this case, will act as a mediator between competing machines in the cluster. We will create a table in the database that tracks scheduled tasks and their status. When a machine in the cluster wants to run one of the scheduled tasks, it first checks the status of that task in the database to see if some other machine is already running that task. If no other machine is running the task, the status of the task will be updated and that machine will run the task.

Another way of thinking about this solution is to think in terms of a concurrent method running on a single machine. If we see the scheduled task in these terms, it becomes clear that the best way to keep multiple threads from running the task at the same time is to use some sort of semaphore. Again, if this was a single method on one machine, we could easily do this by creating a synchronized block around the code that we wanted to protect. When a thread first attempts to enter the synchronized block, it has to attempt to get the lock. If it fails to get the lock, it can't run. In our distributed system, we are using the database as the lock.

We will call our database table "Tasks" and it will have three columns. The first column will be the name of the task, the second the status of the task, and the third the date and time that the task last changed status. The generic SQL script to produce this table is shown below.

CREATE TABLE 'Tasks' (
'TaskName' varchar(50) NOT NULL,
'Status' varchar(25) NOT NULL,
'StatusTime' datetime,
PRIMARY KEY ('TaskName')
) ;

Now that we have created our database table to serve as our mediator, we can create the class that accesses this table in order to determine if a particular instance of a Task can execute. We'll call this class TaskMonitor. (The source code for this article can be downloaded from www.sys-con.com/java/sourcec.cfm.) The class exposes two methods to the public, public static boolean acquireLock(String taskName) and public static void releaseLock(String taskName). Before a Task runs, it will need to call the acquireLock method of the TaskMonitor. If this method returns True, it's safe for the Task to run. If it returns False, then it's not safe for the Task to run as some other instance of this Task in the cluster is already executing. The key to understanding the TaskMonitor class is to understand the ACQUIRE_LOCK SQL query on lines 5-7.

What needs to be done is to determine if the Task in question, as identified by the field TaskName, is currently Idle, and if so, change its Status to Active. The crucial aspect of this is that it needs to happen atomically, that is, it must all happen as one single step. That's why we use a single update statement instead of writing both a select statement to see if the Task is currently Idle and an update to change its Status. In the case where we use the select statement first, it would be possible for the same select statement to be run by the other machines in the cluster before the update is executed. This would result in multiple Tasks running since they would all see the Idle state. By performing the entire process in an update statement, we take advantage of the automatic exclusive row locking that takes place in the database whenever an update statement is executed.

Now that we understand how the ACQUIRE_LOCK query works, the rest of the acquireLock method of the TaskMonitor is easy to follow. On line 23 the query is executed and the results are examined. The executeUpdate method returns the number of rows that were affected by the query. When the ACQUIRE_LOCK query successfully changes the Task from Idle to Active (as will be the case when this particular query is the first one in the cluster to run), one row will have been affected and the lockAcquired flag will be set to true. Otherwise, no rows will be affected and the lockAcquired flag will remain false.

The releaseLock method of TaskMonitor is meant to be called when a Task has finished executing. This method simply changes the status of the Task back to Idle. Both the releaseLock and the acquireLock methods also update the StatusTime field with the current date and time for record-keeping purposes.

One final note on the TaskMonitor class: the getConnection method shown in lines 75-85 should be upgraded before placing this class into production. As written, the method creates a connection to an instance of a MySQL database. A better practice in production would be to retrieve a connection from an existing connection pool.

Together the Tasks database table and the TaskMonitor class provide a framework for ensuring that only one instance of a given Task is running at a particular time, no matter how many instances of the application are running within the clustered system. At this point we're ready to create our report generating Task.

Because we're concerned with managing Tasks in a clustered environment, and not with creating reports or using the javax.mail APIs, we'll create a simple Task, called ReportTask, to illustrate the concept. Because we want this Task to execute automatically on a schedule, we need to extend java.util.TimerTask. TimerTask is an abstract class that has one method that we have to implement, public void run(). This is the method where all the Task's work is done. For our simple example, ReportTask, we'll output some text to show that the Task is running. The code for this class is shown below.

1) import java.util.TimerTask;
2) public class ReportTask extends TimerTask {
3) public void run() {
4) if(TaskMonitor.acquireLock("ReportTask") == false)
5) return;
6) System.out.println("Creating report to be emailed...");
7) TaskMonitor.releaseLock("ReportTask");
8) }
9) }

The key thing to note here is that before the ReportTask actually performs its work, printing some text in this case, it first attempts to acquire the lock for this Task by making the call to acquireLock on line 4. If it fails to acquire the lock, it simply returns without performing its work. However, if it does successfully acquire the lock, then it's free to perform its work and it goes ahead and prints out its message on line 6. Once the Task is complete, it's vital that the lock be released. This is accomplished by calling releaseLock on line 7. If the lock is never released, this Task will never run again on any machine in the cluster. Ensuring that the lock is properly released is clearly not an issue with this simple example; however, in more complex tasks it can be tricky. Consider a Task where several different error conditions could cause the Task to terminate before running to completion. There are now potentially several places where the lock will have to be released.

At this point, you've probably noticed a serious problem with our Task. We never populated the Tasks table with any tasks. As things stand, our ReportTask will never be able to acquire a lock and will never run, and this step needs to take place for every Task that's going to be managed in this way. To rectify this situation we need to insert the ReportTask information into the Tasks table using the following SQL script:

insert into Tasks values (‘ReportTask', ‘Idle', null);

We've nearly finished setting up our system for managing clustered tasks. So far we've created an external resource and a TimerTask called ReportTask that will run in our cluster. All that remains to be done is to create a Timer for running our ReportTask. Because we want to start the Timer for our task as soon as the application starts, we'll create a servlet called StartupServlet that does the work of creating our Timer. We will ensure that StartupServlet is loaded immediately by adding the following lines to web.xml:

<servlet>
<servlet-name>StartupServlet</servlet-name>
<display-name>StartupServlet</display-name>
<description>Used to create the Timers</description>
<servlet-class>StartupServlet</servlet-class>
<load-on-startup>1</load-on-startup>
</servlet>

As our simple StartupServlet is not designed to handle requests, it doesn't need to override any method other than init(). When we create the Timer for running our ReportTask, it's important that we use one of the overloaded constructors to create the Timer as a daemon thread. If we don't specify that the Timer should be a daemon thread and use the default no argument constructor, the Timer will not be a daemon thread. By making it a daemon thread, we ensure that the Timer will continue to run for as long as our Web application runs and that it will terminate when the application terminates. We don't want to try to generate reports if the application has been stopped for some reason.

After calculating how many milliseconds are in a day (we want our ReportTask to run once a day), we schedule the ReportTask to run daily, starting now. On line 12 we place the Timer that we created in the ServletContext. While this is not strictly necessary to keep the ReportTask running, by keeping a reference to the Timer available we are able to check easily on the status of the ReportTimer or cancel it entirely should the need arise.

With the StartupServlet in place, we now have a very basic but workable system for running scheduled Tasks in a clustered environment, without having to worry about the same task running on all of the machines in the cluster simultaneously. It's important to note that if this scheme is used as presented and the tasks being executed complete in a very short period of time, you could still see duplicate executions of the same task if the clocks on all of the machines are not in synch with each other. While it is possible to extend this approach to address this problem, it's outside the scope of this article. With a little bit of effort, this system can also be extended to allow for such things as programmatic modification of the running tasks, robust error handling, and recovery of frozen tasks.

More Stories By Clark D. Richey Jr.

Clark is a principal consultant with the RABA Technologies RiSC group for advanced research and development. In his spare time, he teaches the Java platform to students at Loyola College, where as an associate professor, he shares his experiences with much enthusiasm. Clark is the founder of both JUGaccino, a Maryland-based JUG, and the StopLight and PermissionSniffer open source projects. He is also involved in implementing highly scalable, highly secure, service-oriented architectures using Jini.

Comments (2) View Comments

Share your thoughts on this story.

Add your comment
You must be signed in to add a comment. Sign-in | Register

In accordance with our Comment Policy, we encourage comments that are on topic, relevant and to-the-point. We will remove comments that include profanity, personal attacks, racial slurs, threats of violence, or other inappropriate material that violates our Terms and Conditions, and will block users who make repeated violations. We ask all readers to expect diversity of opinion and to treat one another with dignity and respect.


Most Recent Comments
cbellonch 05/12/05 11:04:17 AM EDT

Hi,
Thanks for the article, it would be useful for our project. We've tried to download the code in:
· www.sys-con.com/java/sourcec.cfm
· http://www.sys-con.com/java/archives3/0903/Richey0903.zip

without success, are the links correct?

tbb 03/10/04 08:44:10 AM EST

I believe a class that implements ServletContextListener would be a better way to solve this problem than a servlet that loads on startup. (If your servlet container implements the servlet 2.3+ spec).

@ThingsExpo Stories
The explosion of connected devices / sensors is creating an ever-expanding set of new and valuable data. In parallel the emerging capability of Big Data technologies to store, access, analyze, and react to this data is producing changes in business models under the umbrella of the Internet of Things (IoT). In particular within the Insurance industry, IoT appears positioned to enable deep changes by altering relationships between insurers, distributors, and the insured. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Michael Sick, a Senior Manager and Big Data Architect within Ernst and Young's Financial Servi...
Performance is the intersection of power, agility, control, and choice. If you value performance, and more specifically consistent performance, you need to look beyond simple virtualized compute. Many factors need to be considered to create a truly performant environment. In his General Session at 15th Cloud Expo, Harold Hannon, Sr. Software Architect at SoftLayer, discussed how to take advantage of a multitude of compute options and platform features to make cloud the cornerstone of your online presence.
Even as cloud and managed services grow increasingly central to business strategy and performance, challenges remain. The biggest sticking point for companies seeking to capitalize on the cloud is data security. Keeping data safe is an issue in any computing environment, and it has been a focus since the earliest days of the cloud revolution. Understandably so: a lot can go wrong when you allow valuable information to live outside the firewall. Recent revelations about government snooping, along with a steady stream of well-publicized data breaches, only add to the uncertainty
The explosion of connected devices / sensors is creating an ever-expanding set of new and valuable data. In parallel the emerging capability of Big Data technologies to store, access, analyze, and react to this data is producing changes in business models under the umbrella of the Internet of Things (IoT). In particular within the Insurance industry, IoT appears positioned to enable deep changes by altering relationships between insurers, distributors, and the insured. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Michael Sick, a Senior Manager and Big Data Architect within Ernst and Young's Financial Servi...
PubNub on Monday has announced that it is partnering with IBM to bring its sophisticated real-time data streaming and messaging capabilities to Bluemix, IBM’s cloud development platform. “Today’s app and connected devices require an always-on connection, but building a secure, scalable solution from the ground up is time consuming, resource intensive, and error-prone,” said Todd Greene, CEO of PubNub. “PubNub enables web, mobile and IoT developers building apps on IBM Bluemix to quickly add scalable realtime functionality with minimal effort and cost.”
Docker is an excellent platform for organizations interested in running microservices. It offers portability and consistency between development and production environments, quick provisioning times, and a simple way to isolate services. In his session at DevOps Summit at 16th Cloud Expo, Shannon Williams, co-founder of Rancher Labs, will walk through these and other benefits of using Docker to run microservices, and provide an overview of RancherOS, a minimalist distribution of Linux designed expressly to run Docker. He will also discuss Rancher, an orchestration and service discovery platf...
Sensor-enabled things are becoming more commonplace, precursors to a larger and more complex framework that most consider the ultimate promise of the IoT: things connecting, interacting, sharing, storing, and over time perhaps learning and predicting based on habits, behaviors, location, preferences, purchases and more. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Tom Wesselman, Director of Communications Ecosystem Architecture at Plantronics, will examine the still nascent IoT as it is coalescing, including what it is today, what it might ultimately be, the role of wearable tech, and technology gaps stil...
Every innovation or invention was originally a daydream. You like to imagine a “what-if” scenario. And with all the attention being paid to the so-called Internet of Things (IoT) you don’t have to stretch the imagination too much to see how this may impact commercial and homeowners insurance. We’re beyond the point of accepting this as a leap of faith. The groundwork is laid. Now it’s just a matter of time. We can thank the inventors of smart thermostats for developing a practical business application that everyone can relate to. Gone are the salad days of smart home apps, the early chalkb...
With several hundred implementations of IoT-enabled solutions in the past 12 months alone, this session will focus on experience over the art of the possible. Many can only imagine the most advanced telematics platform ever deployed, supporting millions of customers, producing tens of thousands events or GBs per trip, and hundreds of TBs per month. With the ability to support a billion sensor events per second, over 30PB of warm data for analytics, and hundreds of PBs for an data analytics archive, in his session at @ThingsExpo, Jim Kaskade, Vice President and General Manager, Big Data & Ana...
CommVault has announced that top industry technology visionaries have joined its leadership team. The addition of leaders from companies such as Oracle, SAP, Microsoft, Cisco, PwC and EMC signals the continuation of CommVault Next, the company's business transformation for sales, go-to-market strategies, pricing and packaging and technology innovation. The company also announced that it had realigned its structure to create business units to more directly match how customers evaluate, deploy, operate, and purchase technology.
In the consumer IoT, everything is new, and the IT world of bits and bytes holds sway. But industrial and commercial realms encompass operational technology (OT) that has been around for 25 or 50 years. This grittier, pre-IP, more hands-on world has much to gain from Industrial IoT (IIoT) applications and principles. But adding sensors and wireless connectivity won’t work in environments that demand unwavering reliability and performance. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Ron Sege, CEO of Echelon, will discuss how as enterprise IT embraces other IoT-related technology trends, enterprises with i...
When it comes to the Internet of Things, hooking up will get you only so far. If you want customers to commit, you need to go beyond simply connecting products. You need to use the devices themselves to transform how you engage with every customer and how you manage the entire product lifecycle. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Sean Lorenz, Technical Product Manager for Xively at LogMeIn, will show how “product relationship management” can help you leverage your connected devices and the data they generate about customer usage and product performance to deliver extremely compelling and reliabl...
The Internet of Things (IoT) is causing data centers to become radically decentralized and atomized within a new paradigm known as “fog computing.” To support IoT applications, such as connected cars and smart grids, data centers' core functions will be decentralized out to the network's edges and endpoints (aka “fogs”). As this trend takes hold, Big Data analytics platforms will focus on high-volume log analysis (aka “logs”) and rely heavily on cognitive-computing algorithms (aka “cogs”) to make sense of it all.
One of the biggest impacts of the Internet of Things is and will continue to be on data; specifically data volume, management and usage. Companies are scrambling to adapt to this new and unpredictable data reality with legacy infrastructure that cannot handle the speed and volume of data. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Don DeLoach, CEO and president of Infobright, will discuss how companies need to rethink their data infrastructure to participate in the IoT, including: Data storage: Understanding the kinds of data: structured, unstructured, big/small? Analytics: What kinds and how responsiv...
Since 2008 and for the first time in history, more than half of humans live in urban areas, urging cities to become “smart.” Today, cities can leverage the wide availability of smartphones combined with new technologies such as Beacons or NFC to connect their urban furniture and environment to create citizen-first services that improve transportation, way-finding and information delivery. In her session at @ThingsExpo, Laetitia Gazel-Anthoine, CEO of Connecthings, will focus on successful use cases.
The Workspace-as-a-Service (WaaS) market will grow to $6.4B by 2018. In his session at 16th Cloud Expo, Seth Bostock, CEO of IndependenceIT, will begin by walking the audience through the evolution of Workspace as-a-Service, where it is now vs. where it going. To look beyond the desktop we must understand exactly what WaaS is, who the users are, and where it is going in the future. IT departments, ISVs and service providers must look to workflow and automation capabilities to adapt to growing demand and the rapidly changing workspace model.
Sensor-enabled things are becoming more commonplace, precursors to a larger and more complex framework that most consider the ultimate promise of the IoT: things connecting, interacting, sharing, storing, and over time perhaps learning and predicting based on habits, behaviors, location, preferences, purchases and more. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Tom Wesselman, Director of Communications Ecosystem Architecture at Plantronics, will examine the still nascent IoT as it is coalescing, including what it is today, what it might ultimately be, the role of wearable tech, and technology gaps stil...
Almost everyone sees the potential of Internet of Things but how can businesses truly unlock that potential. The key will be in the ability to discover business insight in the midst of an ocean of Big Data generated from billions of embedded devices via Systems of Discover. Businesses will also need to ensure that they can sustain that insight by leveraging the cloud for global reach, scale and elasticity.
The Internet of Things (IoT) promises to evolve the way the world does business; however, understanding how to apply it to your company can be a mystery. Most people struggle with understanding the potential business uses or tend to get caught up in the technology, resulting in solutions that fail to meet even minimum business goals. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Jesse Shiah, CEO / President / Co-Founder of AgilePoint Inc., showed what is needed to leverage the IoT to transform your business. He discussed opportunities and challenges ahead for the IoT from a market and technical point of vie...
IoT is still a vague buzzword for many people. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Mike Kavis, Vice President & Principal Cloud Architect at Cloud Technology Partners, discussed the business value of IoT that goes far beyond the general public's perception that IoT is all about wearables and home consumer services. He also discussed how IoT is perceived by investors and how venture capitalist access this space. Other topics discussed were barriers to success, what is new, what is old, and what the future may hold. Mike Kavis is Vice President & Principal Cloud Architect at Cloud Technology Pa...