| By Maureen O'Gara | Article Rating: |
|
| September 22, 2004 12:00 AM EDT | Reads: |
31,027 |
(September 22, 2004) - IBM, which was spooked at the thought of an Oracle-PeopleSoft combination to the point of considering playing white knight, the same chill of fear that sent Microsoft into acquisition talks with SAP, has now allied directly with PeopleSoft, getting it to promise to standardize its applications on IBM's WebSphere middleware.
A definitive agreement is supposed to be hammered out in Q4.
The pact suggests that IBM is acting as spoiler. At the least it will be a complication for Oracle although one ex-Oracle VP quipped that PeopleSoft CEO Craig Conway appeared to be "hanging curtains in a burning building."
The axis, which will reportedly involve a combined investment worth a billion dollars, is called the "largest commitment to the integration of enterprise applications with IBM middleware" and is supposedly "unlike those that force adoption of a separate, proprietary middleware stack that limits [user] flexibility and choice."
Both companies will sell the results, contributing resources, domain expertise, integration technologies and funding. Sales will include third-party software and both PeopleSoft and IBM services.
The two are also supposed to collaborate on new pre-integrated software and establish a business process interoperability lab. The lab is called the first of its kind. It will be used for testing and certification to shorten time-to-market.
The pair is supposed to focus initially on banking, financial markets, insurance and telecommunications.
PeopleSoft is supposed to integrate stuff like the core components of WebSphere Portal, WebSphere Business Integration, WebSphere Application Server and WebSphere Studio Application Developer with its application portfolio.
Meanwhile, PeopleSoft, which has continued to rebuff Oracle's advances since Oracle won the suit brought by the Justice Department to block any takeover, moved to put another obstacle in Oracle's way and at the same time retain its employees, 80% of whom Oracle testified in court will be fired if it succeeds in acquiring the company.
PeopleSoft told the SEC at the end of last week that it had boosted its severance package. Now, if Oracle takes over, all employees will get a minimum of 12 weeks base salary and 12 weeks of health insurance payments, instead of a minimum of two weeks base pay for each year of service up to a maximum of three months base salary.
Executive officers besides the chief executive will get between 1.5 times and 2.0 times their annual base salaries and target bonus payments of up to 24 months of health coverage. The executive officers were supposed to get 0.75 and 1.0 times their annual base and target bonus.
PeopleSoft also accelerated the vesting of all employee stock options if a takeover occurs
In reaction, Oracle issued a statement saying that the move lowered the value of the company. It also said that press speculation that PeopleSoft had made its acquisition more expensive to Oracle was "not necessarily true."
Published September 22, 2004 Reads 31,027
Copyright © 2004 SYS-CON Media, Inc. — All Rights Reserved.
Syndicated stories and blog feeds, all rights reserved by the author.
More Stories By Maureen O'Gara
Maureen O'Gara the most read technology reporter for the past 20 years, is the Cloud Computing and Virtualization News Desk editor of SYS-CON Media. She is the publisher of famous "Billygrams" and the editor-in-chief of "Client/Server News" for more than a decade. One of the most respected technology reporters in the business, Maureen can be reached by email at maureen(at)sys-con.com or paperboy(at)g2news.com, and by phone at 516 759-7025.
![]() |
Craig 09/22/04 07:17:22 PM EDT | |||
I don't want to see a snide comment from an anonymous "ex-Oracle VP" - he can give his name. If he can't, I don't want to see what he has to snipe about. There are times anonymity is appropriate. Cowardice for attacking a competitor with a 'quip' is not one. |
||||
- Kindle 2 vs Nook
- Why IBM’s Server Chief Got Busted
- Is Cloud Computing Like Teenage Sex?
- Industry Experts Discuss the State of Cloud Computing
- Performance Tuning Essentials for Java
- Confessions of a Ulitzer Addict
- Tactical Cloud Computing Panel at 1st Annual GovIT Expo
- It's the Java vs. C++ Shootout Revisited!
- Cloud Computing Can Revitalize Your Career as Software Developer
- IBM Could "Reinvent" Java: Mills
- Oracle & Cloud Computing: Exclusive Q&A with SVP Richard Sarwal
- A Brief History of Cloud Computing
- Kindle 2 vs Nook
- Cloud CEOs, CTOs & SVPs to Speak at 4th International Cloud Computing Expo
- Why IBM’s Server Chief Got Busted
- Is Cloud Computing Like Teenage Sex?
- Industry Experts Discuss the State of Cloud Computing
- Performance Tuning Essentials for Java
- The Difference Between Web Hosting and Cloud Computing
- Cloud Computing Expo: Exclusive Q&A with Yahoo! SVP Cloud Computing
- Ajax in RichFaces 3.3, JSF 2 and RichFaces 4
- Confessions of a Ulitzer Addict
- My Thoughts on Ulitzer
- Tactical Cloud Computing Panel at 1st Annual GovIT Expo
- A Cup of AJAX? Nay, Just Regular Java Please
- Java Developer's Journal Exclusive: 2006 "JDJ Editors' Choice" Awards
- The i-Technology Right Stuff
- JavaServer Faces (JSF) vs Struts
- Rich Internet Applications with Adobe Flex 2 and Java
- Java vs C++ "Shootout" Revisited
- Bean-Managed Persistence Using a Proxy List
- Reporting Made Easy with JasperReports and Hibernate
- Creating a Pet Store Application with JavaServer Faces, Spring, and Hibernate
- What's New in Eclipse?
- Why Do 'Cool Kids' Choose Ruby or PHP to Build Websites Instead of Java?
- i-Technology Predictions for 2007: Where's It All Headed?










































