| By Maureen O'Gara | Article Rating: |
|
| September 24, 2004 12:00 AM EDT | Reads: |
16,829 |
Sun has been repeating itself lately and saying that it really is gonna open source Solaris 10, the next major update of the Unix operating system, by the end of the year, to get other people to contribute to it and hopefully revivify interest in the one-foot-in-the-grave OS.
Sun will continue to control what goes into the thing. The way things are structured the project will supposedly resemble Red Hat's Fedora.
Solaris-as-open-source is a veritable legal minefield because Sun frankly doesn't know where some of the code comes from or who owns it, a realization on the part of its legal department that stopped Sun from open sourcing the operating system years ago when the notion first presented itself.
As a result, Solaris won't exactly be your classic open source project. Sun won't be able to share all the code.
Solaris 10 includes widgetry called Janus appropriately enough that will run Linux application unchanged. Whether Janus will be ready when Solaris 20 pops is another story. Sun may have to play catch-up.
Meanwhile, Sun, which like the little boy who put his finger in the dike, is trying to stop Wall Street from swamping it as it rushes to replace Sun gear with industry standard stuff, has been telling folks that Solaris on Opteron is a heck of a sight better and cheaper than Red Hat, which it's now targeting as Red Hat does Sun.
Published September 24, 2004 Reads 16,829
Copyright © 2004 SYS-CON Media, Inc. — All Rights Reserved.
Syndicated stories and blog feeds, all rights reserved by the author.
More Stories By Maureen O'Gara
Maureen O'Gara the most read technology reporter for the past 20 years, is the Cloud Computing and Virtualization News Desk editor of SYS-CON Media. She is the publisher of famous "Billygrams" and the editor-in-chief of "Client/Server News" for more than a decade. One of the most respected technology reporters in the business, Maureen can be reached by email at maureen(at)sys-con.com or paperboy(at)g2news.com, and by phone at 516 759-7025. Twitter: @MaureenOGara
![]() |
Christopher Saul 09/24/04 01:19:21 PM EDT | |||
Can anyone explain why someone might choose Solaris over Linux, other than for the fact that it's vastly more scalable, better supported, better documented and has a huge number of commercial, fully supported applications available, as well as being able to run all the OSS stuff out there, as well as having a massive install base and a tonne of experienced systems admininstrators with a multi-billion dollar company's backing, a company who also support the hardware it runs on and as well as having a tonne of features not fully or decently implemented in Linux? |
||||
![]() |
guacamole 09/24/04 01:17:54 PM EDT | |||
Solaris has some benefits for enterprise use. To begin, you're getting support for the OS and the hardware from the same company. The release schedule is very sane (about once in two years) and each OS release is supported for like 6 to 8 years. RedHat Enterprise Linux has a similar release and support policy but it costs more (as of right now you just need to make a one time payment for the Solaris OS which is still less than the price of one year RHEL subscription in most cases). On the technical side, Solaris scales really well on large hardware and it is very usable under a high load. If I see load avg. go over say 4 or 5 on a single CPU Linux system, it's often extremely unresponsive and nearly unusable while Solaris copes much better under such conditions. |
||||
![]() |
Allen Zadr 09/24/04 01:16:27 PM EDT | |||
Solaris is a strong OS, despite losing some market share in the last 8 years. Open Source projects benefit from being listed on the solarisfreeware web site. As an admin I've always had a tendancy to use and support whatever project has the largest cross-platform capability. |
||||
![]() |
calum1 09/24/04 01:15:01 PM EDT | |||
If I had to choose between a Solaris install, or a Linux install, on its own, with a live IP address, I'd choose Linux every time. |
||||
- Patterns for Building High Performance Applications
- It's the Java vs. C++ Shootout Revisited!
- Asynchronous Logging Using Spring
- Java for Programmers (2nd Edition)
- Cross-Platform Mobile Website Development – a Tool Comparison
- Three Buzzwords That Every CIO Hears but One They Should Listen To
- Write Once Run Anywhere or Cross Platform Mobile Development Tools
- Immersing into JavaScript Frameworks
- Workday Reportedly Prepping to Go Public
- Cloud Expo New York: The Java EE 7 Platform - Developing for the Cloud
- Book Review: Sams Teach Yourself Java in 24 Hours
- OpenOffice.com Lives
- Book Excerpt: Introducing HTML5
- Adobe Sends Flex to the Apache Foundation
- Five Years Waiting for JRE 7: Is It Justified? (Part 1)
- Book Excerpt: Java Application Profiling Tips and Tricks
- i-Technology in 2012: Five Industry Predictions
- Patterns for Building High Performance Applications
- It's the Java vs. C++ Shootout Revisited!
- OpenXava 4.3: Rapid Java Web Development
- The Next Web Architecture
- Asynchronous Logging Using Spring
- Java for Programmers (2nd Edition)
- Is Write Once Run Anywhere Ever Going to Be a Reality?
- A Cup of AJAX? Nay, Just Regular Java Please
- Java Developer's Journal Exclusive: 2006 "JDJ Editors' Choice" Awards
- JavaServer Faces (JSF) vs Struts
- The i-Technology Right Stuff
- Rich Internet Applications with Adobe Flex 2 and Java
- Java vs C++ "Shootout" Revisited
- Bean-Managed Persistence Using a Proxy List
- Reporting Made Easy with JasperReports and Hibernate
- Creating a Pet Store Application with JavaServer Faces, Spring, and Hibernate
- Why Do 'Cool Kids' Choose Ruby or PHP to Build Websites Instead of Java?
- What's New in Eclipse?
- i-Technology Predictions for 2007: Where's It All Headed?






















