| By Jeremy Geelan | Article Rating: |
|
| October 20, 2004 12:00 AM EDT | Reads: |
26,886 |
Related Links:
If anyone for a moment thinks Scott McNealy is going to take some kind of back seat in the public eye now that Sun has go-to president and COO Jonathan Schwartz dealing with the press and analysts on a seemingly equal footing with his boss, they are wrong. McNealy is still as combative as ever, as he proved when talking to the San Jose Mercury News this week.
Asked about the $174 million loss Sun reported in the most recent quarter, McNealy countered with the simple ten-word riposte: "Where's the beef? We made money in the June quarter."
But he saved his best shot at the poor reporter when asked whether there was any truth in the perception that "Sun is trying to lock in customers with proprietary technology."
Here is McNealy's fusillade in reply:
"For 22 years, I've said name a technical specification at Sun that is not open, published or adopted by some or all of the computer industry. You can't. To call Sun proprietary is as big a lie as you could put in your newspaper. If I were to say IBM is bankrupt and you were to publish that, that would be the same as saying Sun is proprietary."
Asked about Sun's current share price, McNealy was equally unrepentant. "What do you think is a reasonable stock price for Sun?" he replied. "Does $4.20 seem unreasonable?"
"We've got 3.3 billion shares of stock. That puts us at a $13 billion to $14 billion market capitalization. Take out net cash and you've got a $6.5 billion market cap. That's a half times revenue."
When asked by JDJ at the beginning of the year where i-Technology was going in 2004, McNealy predicted:
"The world is still going to keep a tight hold on its purse strings, and every dollar will be hard earned. There's no magic pill that's going to bring about an economic recovery. For the tech sector, it's going to take a complete rethinking of IT investments in terms of competitive advantage, operating and maintenance costs, and total cost of ownership.
Plenty of companies are already following this path, and will continue to invest in scaling out their IT networks by leveraging the economics of industry-standard x86 computing, where Solaris x86, Linux, and open source alternatives offer up a pretty compelling story. At the same time, there'll be a renewed focus on scaling up, leveraging highly available 64-bit Unix systems for demanding government, enterprise, and service provider environments, as companies dial-up IT investments to keep ahead of the competition."

Sun Microsystems CEO Scott
McNealy
Ten months on, McNealy's view of the economy is somewhat more opaque. "I saw the report on what is happening to IT jobs around here," he told the Mercury News reporter. "You haven't seen anything yet."
Then followed an explanation which centered on the notion of "disruptive technology":
"If everyone built their own custom car, the employment in the auto industry would be millions and millions. Now imagine Henry Ford comes along creates the assembly line. That would be very disruptive. So what does that do economically? If you are a truck maker, that is a good thing. If you are Dell, and you only do a piece of the work where your job is distributing piston rings to garages, it's not good."
The concern that Sun's June-quarter profit, the first for quite a while, was only possible because of Sun's lucrative $1.6 billion cash payment from Microsoft to settle the antitrust and patent litigation between the two companies, was another issue that brought the wrath of McNealy down on the head of the San Jose-based reporter.
Of the $1.6 billion he said: "That was a full cash write-on. Give me for credit for that. I just had a write-on instead of a write-off, cash in the bank, and everybody discounts that."
During a conference call to discuss the September quarter's results, McNealy had been in a characteristically upbeat mood, saying: "The team worked really hard and executed on what is usually our toughest quarter."
McNealy, Schwartz and his team said they plan to be very aggressive with Sun's new line of Opteron servers and are hoping that the continued rollout of UltraSPARC IV processors across the SunFire server line and the upcoming release of the Solaris 10 operating system, due out by year end, will strengthen the company's performance moving forward.
The main thing McNealy stressed was that that Sun's revenue had increased for
the quarter - to $2.63 billion from $2.54 billion for the same quarter a year
ago. Useful, in a quarter that included Sun's payment of $82 million to settle its
long-running patent dispute with Eastman Kodak.
Related
Links:
Published October 20, 2004 Reads 26,886
Copyright © 2004 SYS-CON Media, Inc. — All Rights Reserved.
Syndicated stories and blog feeds, all rights reserved by the author.
More Stories By Jeremy Geelan
Jeremy Geelan is President & COO of Cloud Expo, Inc. and Conference Chair of the worldwide Cloud Expo series. He appears regularly at conferences and trade shows, speaking to technology audiences both in North America and overseas. He is executive producer and presenter of Cloud Expo's "Power Panels" on SYS-CON.TV.
![]() |
Rex 10/20/04 10:15:39 AM EDT | |||
It would take quite a bit to bankrupt IBM, but it doesn't take much to make Sun a proprietary platform. Sun believes that Java is not proprietary. And they believe that Solaris is an open operating system. If that's the case, why are they so vociferously competing against IBM and BEA based on charges of properitary infrastructure, and losing so much against Linux, which is truly open? Face it, McNealy - you're on a proprietary platform. Maybe not as much as Microsoft, but definitely moreso than Linux and even IBM's platform. Get real. |
||||
![]() |
Jason 10/19/04 05:24:58 PM EDT | |||
Does that mean that IBM is "proprietary" and Sun is "bankrupt?" :-) |
||||
- It's the Java vs. C++ Shootout Revisited!
- Patterns for Building High Performance Applications
- Asynchronous Logging Using Spring
- Java for Programmers (2nd Edition)
- Cross-Platform Mobile Website Development – a Tool Comparison
- Three Buzzwords That Every CIO Hears but One They Should Listen To
- Write Once Run Anywhere or Cross Platform Mobile Development Tools
- Immersing into JavaScript Frameworks
- Workday Reportedly Prepping to Go Public
- Cloud Expo New York: The Java EE 7 Platform - Developing for the Cloud
- Book Review: Sams Teach Yourself Java in 24 Hours
- OpenOffice.com Lives
- Book Excerpt: Introducing HTML5
- Adobe Sends Flex to the Apache Foundation
- Five Years Waiting for JRE 7: Is It Justified? (Part 1)
- Book Excerpt: Java Application Profiling Tips and Tricks
- i-Technology in 2012: Five Industry Predictions
- It's the Java vs. C++ Shootout Revisited!
- Patterns for Building High Performance Applications
- OpenXava 4.3: Rapid Java Web Development
- The Next Web Architecture
- Asynchronous Logging Using Spring
- Java for Programmers (2nd Edition)
- Is Write Once Run Anywhere Ever Going to Be a Reality?
- A Cup of AJAX? Nay, Just Regular Java Please
- Java Developer's Journal Exclusive: 2006 "JDJ Editors' Choice" Awards
- JavaServer Faces (JSF) vs Struts
- The i-Technology Right Stuff
- Rich Internet Applications with Adobe Flex 2 and Java
- Java vs C++ "Shootout" Revisited
- Bean-Managed Persistence Using a Proxy List
- Reporting Made Easy with JasperReports and Hibernate
- Creating a Pet Store Application with JavaServer Faces, Spring, and Hibernate
- Why Do 'Cool Kids' Choose Ruby or PHP to Build Websites Instead of Java?
- What's New in Eclipse?
- i-Technology Predictions for 2007: Where's It All Headed?



















