| By Coach Wei | Article Rating: |
|
| December 8, 2004 12:00 AM EST | Reads: |
27,317 |
It's no surprise that the common perception is that Web applications are unreliable and problematic. Users often experience "404," "resource unavailable," and "network unavailable" errors or even a mysterious application error telling them to "retry the application later." The truth is, a fundamental source of all these problems is the HTTP communication layer of the Web.
The Internet was initially designed for presenting and sharing hyperlinked documents in the form of Web pages. Therefore, the communication layer is based on the HTTP "Request/Response" model, which adequately serves the purpose of page browsing. However, the Internet has since evolved far beyond simply supporting browsing activity and is now being utilized as an interactive platform for supporting mission-critical enterprise applications. However, in this context, there are still problematic Web browsing assumptions made - especially with regard to the messaging layer - when it comes to Web application development.
First off, the Web's messaging layer does not support guaranteed message delivery. When a user submits a request to the server, whether this request will actually arrive at the server or not is unpredictable. If there is a network problem (either with the ISP or within the corporate network), there is a good chance the request will be lost. However, this is not always a problem for Internet browsing, as the user can always click the link a second and third time if the first URL request is lost. Although this seems like a basic example, it's a serious problem for mission-critical enterprise applications. The point is, it's not out of the realm of pos-sibility that a multi-million dollar transaction can literally be "riding on the line."
Another factor to consider is that the Web's messaging layer does not guarantee the order of message delivery. If the user submits two requests in a row, there is no guarantee that the first request will arrive at the server before the second request. Again, while this is not necessarily a problem for browsing Web pages, the result of a later request can be dependent on an earlier request when using the Internet for business applications. A random ordering of message delivery makes the application's behavior unpredictable - a pattern that many Web application users are familiar with.
Further, the Web's messaging layer does not support server-initiated or server-push communications; it supports client-pull only. In a client-pull only model, the server works like a phone that never rings. Obviously this is not a problem for browsing because the server simply responds to page requests. However, many enterprise applications require the server to initiate interactions. For example, a stock trading application needs to push the latest stock price from the server to the end user. To side step this problem, developers typically use client polling, but this significantly increases the server/network load and therefore decreases application performance.
As discussed, when considering developing and deploying Web applications, the messaging layer's unreliability and limited functionality are fundamental problems that must be seriously considered. A potential solution to the message reliability issue is to implement message queuing on both the client and server side. Thus, if a message failed to be delivered due to a temporary network problem, the message can be retrieved from the queue and re-sent once the network is available. Message queues also help guarantee the order of delivery. To get around server-push limitations, some developers leverage client-polling techniques. Although it is possible to develop a solution in-house to address some of these issues, the technical challenge can be significant and the cost to test and maintain the solution can be high.
An alternative approach is to investigate some commercially available application platforms that have built-in solutions to all these problems. Some Rich Internet Application (RIA) platform solutions now available have a built-in capability for reliable messaging and real-time server push. Such solutions not only deliver a richer application experience, but also dramatically improve the application's robustness and reliability by providing a stronger communication layer - a critical factor when considering the Internet as a means of housing enterprise-level applications.
As the Web continues to become more widely adopted as a mission-critical enterprise application platform, it's even more imperative that developers truly understand and take into consideration its flawed communication model. There are now RIA solutions available to help developers overcome these limitations. Otherwise, traditional Web applications will not only frustrate end users and IT staff, they will also introduce significant problems that disrupt everyday operations.
Published December 8, 2004 Reads 27,317
Copyright © 2004 SYS-CON Media, Inc. — All Rights Reserved.
Syndicated stories and blog feeds, all rights reserved by the author.
More Stories By Coach Wei
Coach Wei is the Founder and Chairman of Nexaweb (www.nexaweb.com), developers of the leading software platform for building and deploying Web 2.0 and AJAX applications. Previously, he played a key role at EMC Corporation in the development of a new generation of storage network management software. Wei has his master's degree from MIT, holds several patents, is the author of several technology publications including JDJ, Web 2.0 Journal, and AJAXWorld Magazine, and is an industry advocate for the proliferation of open standards.
![]() |
mike skramstad 05/27/08 04:47:20 AM EDT | |||
I write and use error detection scripts and automatic repair routines to ensure that applications are available all the time. Essentially, looking for the '404' or other errors before users see them and fixing them automatically. |
||||
![]() |
Geoffrey Wiseman 12/20/04 09:28:51 AM EST | |||
The internet was not designed for sharing hyperlinked documents -- nor was HTTP part of the 'design of the internet'. The web is not the internet. |
||||
![]() |
RK 12/15/04 09:31:02 AM EST | |||
The beauty of the web (read HTTP) and the cause of wide adoption is most certainly its simplicity. There is no client to develop as a standard HTTP/HTML+ client is already available with users (ala browser). By far these are the reasons why web development has exploded in the last few years. I understand that this is not perfect but I would hesitate to recommend any other protocol (RIA in this case) because of the less than 10% scenario when the limitations surface as critical issues. |
||||
![]() |
Robert Roach 12/14/04 09:37:22 PM EST | |||
The author seems to be trying to lead the reader to consider RIAs. So, why not write something more substantial about that, rather than merely a passing reference to RIAs mentioned near the end of the article. Everything else written is either obvious, repetitive or in some cases wrong (Internet designed to serve http pages, huh?). Hard to take this article seriously. |
||||
![]() |
disappointed 12/14/04 03:59:03 PM EST | |||
The Internet was initially designed for presenting and sharing hyperlinked documents in the form of Web pages??? |
||||
![]() |
R Martin Ladner 12/14/04 05:45:56 AM EST | |||
Consider Macromedia Flash Communications Server for reliable two-way communication between server and client. |
||||
- Kindle 2 vs Nook
- Why IBM’s Server Chief Got Busted
- Is Cloud Computing Like Teenage Sex?
- Industry Experts Discuss the State of Cloud Computing
- Performance Tuning Essentials for Java
- Confessions of a Ulitzer Addict
- Tactical Cloud Computing Panel at 1st Annual GovIT Expo
- It's the Java vs. C++ Shootout Revisited!
- Cloud Computing Can Revitalize Your Career as Software Developer
- IBM Could "Reinvent" Java: Mills
- Oracle & Cloud Computing: Exclusive Q&A with SVP Richard Sarwal
- A Brief History of Cloud Computing
- Kindle 2 vs Nook
- Cloud CEOs, CTOs & SVPs to Speak at 4th International Cloud Computing Expo
- Why IBM’s Server Chief Got Busted
- Is Cloud Computing Like Teenage Sex?
- Industry Experts Discuss the State of Cloud Computing
- Performance Tuning Essentials for Java
- The Difference Between Web Hosting and Cloud Computing
- Cloud Computing Expo: Exclusive Q&A with Yahoo! SVP Cloud Computing
- Ajax in RichFaces 3.3, JSF 2 and RichFaces 4
- Confessions of a Ulitzer Addict
- My Thoughts on Ulitzer
- Tactical Cloud Computing Panel at 1st Annual GovIT Expo
- A Cup of AJAX? Nay, Just Regular Java Please
- Java Developer's Journal Exclusive: 2006 "JDJ Editors' Choice" Awards
- The i-Technology Right Stuff
- JavaServer Faces (JSF) vs Struts
- Rich Internet Applications with Adobe Flex 2 and Java
- Java vs C++ "Shootout" Revisited
- Bean-Managed Persistence Using a Proxy List
- Reporting Made Easy with JasperReports and Hibernate
- Creating a Pet Store Application with JavaServer Faces, Spring, and Hibernate
- What's New in Eclipse?
- Why Do 'Cool Kids' Choose Ruby or PHP to Build Websites Instead of Java?
- i-Technology Predictions for 2007: Where's It All Headed?







































