Welcome!

Java Authors: Carmen Gonzalez, Pat Romanski, Victoria Livschitz, Liz McMillan, Larry Dragich

Related Topics: Java

Java: Article

SOA Solutions with J2EE

Using different technical and functional requirements

Throughout this article I'll describe how an effective service-oriented architecture (SOA) can be achieved using J2EE technologies. In particular, I'll focus on which J2EE component types and communication channels to choose according to specific, real-world situations.

Description of the Example System
To illustrate an SOA system made of J2EE technologies, nothing is better than a good old example. Figure 1 depicts the main situations that can arise in a realistic SOA system. A component stereotype indicates the type of client or service; a dependency stereotype indicates the communication type, either as a technology (such as Web services) or as a protocol (such as CORBA IIOP); and a no dependency stereotype indicates RMI communication.

The system allows client systems to process an order (service OrderWorkflow), manage customers (service Customer), and produce reports (service Reporting). The OrderWorkflow service checks product availability and retrieves product details (service Product), creates a new customer if needed (service Customer), and orders the selected products (service Order). The Order service persists the order (service OrderData), manages the payment (service Payment), and triggers some process in a legacy system (service BackOfficeOrder).

Service Layers
Services differ according to multiple criteria. Whether the service is business oriented, public or private, or stateful or stateless dictates what layer the service is in and ultimately how it is implemented and what interfaces it exposes.

Top-layer services such as OrderWorkflow are coarse-grained business services, often stateful, that depend on one or more finer-grained stateless business services. Bottom-layer services are fine grained and data oriented, not business oriented.

Services are also separated into public and private services. Public services are services that are available outside of the system, and possibly outside of the organization. They are typically services that have a business meaning. Private services have no business meaning; they exist to support business services and there's no point in making them available to other systems. In Figure 1, public services are colored in blue and private services are not colored.

Although the number of layers of an SOA system is arbitrary, we can categorize them and associate usual J2EE component types to them as shown in Table 1.

Service Communication Interfaces
In SOA systems, service interfaces are even more important than service implementations, because interoperability essentially depends on the communication technologies supported by the service interfaces. Remember one of the founding principles of service architecture: the service implementation is separated from the service interface(s).

To continue this discussion, we'll distinguish between "internal" and "external" clients. A client is internal if the organization controls the network path between the client and the service. In all other cases the client is external. This distinction is driven by the fact that firewalls might be located between the external client and the service, and no assumption can be made on which ports the firewall keeps open and which protocols the firewall lets pass, except that it allows text over HTTP. In particular, this is true if the client component is located on the Internet.

The major condition to decide on in a service interface technology is whether the service clients are internal or not. In Figure 1, external clients are red and internal clients are green. ExternalMainClient uses the Internet. As mentioned earlier, this causes severe restrictions as to which ports and protocols are available for communication. For example, communicating in RMI or IIOP is not realistic, since most firewalls will not let these protocols go through. In such a situation, only text-based protocols over HTTP (or HTTPS) should be considered.

Web services, a standardized technology that leverages the convenience of XML as text over HTTP, is the best technology available, provided that the client platform supports Web services. The .NET client from our example understands Web services. If it were not the case, we would have had to downgrade the communication to, for example, plain XML text over HTTP, with custom XML generation and parsing on the client side.

Now let's have a look at internal clients. OrderClient is a J2EE application client using RMI to communicate with OrderWorkflow. Why RMI and not Web services? Isn't Web services the most cool technology that every supporting platform should use when possible? Well, no. Using Web services between "internal" J2EE components has a heavy performance toll. Performance, which is a critical factor for most systems, is much more favorable to RMI than to Web services. It must be noted that Web services still has opportunities for significant optimizations, but current Web services implementations are notoriously slower than RMI.

The golden rule is: if a J2EE service only has internal J2EE or Java clients, stick to RMI, but if you can't make this assumption, consider Web services.This rule can be understood with a bit of logic: the closer the interface technology is to the implementation technology, the less work that has to be done to translate between the two. For example, XML, which Web services messages are made of, is farther from Java than RMI is. The gap between XML types and Java types is wider than the gap between CORBA IIOP types and Java types, which in turn is wider than the gap between RMI types and Java types. To generalize this rule, we can say that the more interoperable a technology is, the slower it tends to be. Although technology implementations can provide exceptions to this rule, the rule remains true in the vast majority of cases.

Each situation requires a decision based on the trade-off between interoperability and performance.

Fortunately, interoperability and performance benefits can be combined thanks to the fact that a service can have more than one interface. OrderWorkflow is a good example. While its implementation of the application logic is developed only once, the service presents two different interfaces: one RMI and one Web services.

Moreover, with the right tools, service interfaces can be generated automatically from one another. For example, a tool such as Castor XML or a JAXB implementation can generate Java classes from the XML Schemas. The RMI interface is thus generated with minimal hand coding. Enabling Web services as EJB endpoints is also a good alternative.

Figure 2 focuses on the OrderWorkflow service to illustrate how a single service is accessed through two communication channels. ExternalMainClient accesses the service through its Web services interface, which in terms of J2EE component types is a Web application resource (WAR). Upon receiving a Web services request, the WAR makes an ordinary Java method call to the business delegate located in the JAR, which in turn makes an RMI call to the EJB.

In contrast, the local OrderClient J2EE client directly calls the delegate without going through the WAR. The service business logic is located in the EJB-JAR component, and the WAR implements a Web services interface layer above the ordinary business delegate. Both interfaces share exactly the same business logic. This design pattern ensures a multiple-communication-channel SOA as well as the scalability, distributability, and other capabilities provided by the EJB technology.

The marketing application is a C legacy application that calls the reporting component to present statistical data to the user. Marketing is an internal client, but does not support RMI. CORBA is an effective and mature distributed architecture available to both C and J2EE platforms. Again, the reason for choosing CORBA over Web services is the performance. As a general rule, internal components should not communicate through Web services unless some other capability of Web services, such as the UDDI publish-discover mechanism, for example, is a deciding factor.

More Stories By Bruno Collet

Bruno Collet is a seasoned J2EE architect with five years of experience. He recently founded Studio 184 (www.studio184.com), where he is developing the ApolloNews news aggregator. Bruno holds a masters in computer science from ULB (Belgium), as well as several industry certifications (www.brunocollet.com).

Comments (0)

Share your thoughts on this story.

Add your comment
You must be signed in to add a comment. Sign-in | Register

In accordance with our Comment Policy, we encourage comments that are on topic, relevant and to-the-point. We will remove comments that include profanity, personal attacks, racial slurs, threats of violence, or other inappropriate material that violates our Terms and Conditions, and will block users who make repeated violations. We ask all readers to expect diversity of opinion and to treat one another with dignity and respect.


@ThingsExpo Stories
The Internet of Things will put IT to its ultimate test by creating infinite new opportunities to digitize products and services, generate and analyze new data to improve customer satisfaction, and discover new ways to gain a competitive advantage across nearly every industry. In order to help corporate business units to capitalize on the rapidly evolving IoT opportunities, IT must stand up to a new set of challenges. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Jeff Kaplan, Managing Director of THINKstrategies, will examine why IT must finally fulfill its role in support of its SBUs or face a new round of...
One of the biggest challenges when developing connected devices is identifying user value and delivering it through successful user experiences. In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, Mike Kuniavsky, Principal Scientist, Innovation Services at PARC, described an IoT-specific approach to user experience design that combines approaches from interaction design, industrial design and service design to create experiences that go beyond simple connected gadgets to create lasting, multi-device experiences grounded in people's real needs and desires.
Enthusiasm for the Internet of Things has reached an all-time high. In 2013 alone, venture capitalists spent more than $1 billion dollars investing in the IoT space. With "smart" appliances and devices, IoT covers wearable smart devices, cloud services to hardware companies. Nest, a Google company, detects temperatures inside homes and automatically adjusts it by tracking its user's habit. These technologies are quickly developing and with it come challenges such as bridging infrastructure gaps, abiding by privacy concerns and making the concept a reality. These challenges can't be addressed w...
The Domain Name Service (DNS) is one of the most important components in networking infrastructure, enabling users and services to access applications by translating URLs (names) into IP addresses (numbers). Because every icon and URL and all embedded content on a website requires a DNS lookup loading complex sites necessitates hundreds of DNS queries. In addition, as more internet-enabled ‘Things' get connected, people will rely on DNS to name and find their fridges, toasters and toilets. According to a recent IDG Research Services Survey this rate of traffic will only grow. What's driving t...
Scott Jenson leads a project called The Physical Web within the Chrome team at Google. Project members are working to take the scalability and openness of the web and use it to talk to the exponentially exploding range of smart devices. Nearly every company today working on the IoT comes up with the same basic solution: use my server and you'll be fine. But if we really believe there will be trillions of these devices, that just can't scale. We need a system that is open a scalable and by using the URL as a basic building block, we open this up and get the same resilience that the web enjoys.
Connected devices and the Internet of Things are getting significant momentum in 2014. In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, Jim Hunter, Chief Scientist & Technology Evangelist at Greenwave Systems, examined three key elements that together will drive mass adoption of the IoT before the end of 2015. The first element is the recent advent of robust open source protocols (like AllJoyn and WebRTC) that facilitate M2M communication. The second is broad availability of flexible, cost-effective storage designed to handle the massive surge in back-end data in a world where timely analytics is e...
We are reaching the end of the beginning with WebRTC, and real systems using this technology have begun to appear. One challenge that faces every WebRTC deployment (in some form or another) is identity management. For example, if you have an existing service – possibly built on a variety of different PaaS/SaaS offerings – and you want to add real-time communications you are faced with a challenge relating to user management, authentication, authorization, and validation. Service providers will want to use their existing identities, but these will have credentials already that are (hopefully) i...
"Matrix is an ambitious open standard and implementation that's set up to break down the fragmentation problems that exist in IP messaging and VoIP communication," explained John Woolf, Technical Evangelist at Matrix, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at @ThingsExpo, held Nov 4–6, 2014, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
How do APIs and IoT relate? The answer is not as simple as merely adding an API on top of a dumb device, but rather about understanding the architectural patterns for implementing an IoT fabric. There are typically two or three trends: Exposing the device to a management framework Exposing that management framework to a business centric logic Exposing that business layer and data to end users. This last trend is the IoT stack, which involves a new shift in the separation of what stuff happens, where data lives and where the interface lies. For instance, it's a mix of architectural styles ...
Cultural, regulatory, environmental, political and economic (CREPE) conditions over the past decade are creating cross-industry solution spaces that require processes and technologies from both the Internet of Things (IoT), and Data Management and Analytics (DMA). These solution spaces are evolving into Sensor Analytics Ecosystems (SAE) that represent significant new opportunities for organizations of all types. Public Utilities throughout the world, providing electricity, natural gas and water, are pursuing SmartGrid initiatives that represent one of the more mature examples of SAE. We have s...
The Internet of Things will greatly expand the opportunities for data collection and new business models driven off of that data. In her session at @ThingsExpo, Esmeralda Swartz, CMO of MetraTech, discussed how for this to be effective you not only need to have infrastructure and operational models capable of utilizing this new phenomenon, but increasingly service providers will need to convince a skeptical public to participate. Get ready to show them the money!
P2P RTC will impact the landscape of communications, shifting from traditional telephony style communications models to OTT (Over-The-Top) cloud assisted & PaaS (Platform as a Service) communication services. The P2P shift will impact many areas of our lives, from mobile communication, human interactive web services, RTC and telephony infrastructure, user federation, security and privacy implications, business costs, and scalability. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Robin Raymond, Chief Architect at Hookflash, will walk through the shifting landscape of traditional telephone and voice services ...
The Internet of Things is tied together with a thin strand that is known as time. Coincidentally, at the core of nearly all data analytics is a timestamp. When working with time series data there are a few core principles that everyone should consider, especially across datasets where time is the common boundary. In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, Jim Scott, Director of Enterprise Strategy & Architecture at MapR Technologies, discussed single-value, geo-spatial, and log time series data. By focusing on enterprise applications and the data center, he will use OpenTSDB as an example t...
Explosive growth in connected devices. Enormous amounts of data for collection and analysis. Critical use of data for split-second decision making and actionable information. All three are factors in making the Internet of Things a reality. Yet, any one factor would have an IT organization pondering its infrastructure strategy. How should your organization enhance its IT framework to enable an Internet of Things implementation? In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, James Kirkland, Chief Architect for the Internet of Things and Intelligent Systems at Red Hat, described how to revolutioniz...
Bit6 today issued a challenge to the technology community implementing Web Real Time Communication (WebRTC). To leap beyond WebRTC’s significant limitations and fully leverage its underlying value to accelerate innovation, application developers need to consider the entire communications ecosystem.
The definition of IoT is not new, in fact it’s been around for over a decade. What has changed is the public's awareness that the technology we use on a daily basis has caught up on the vision of an always on, always connected world. If you look into the details of what comprises the IoT, you’ll see that it includes everything from cloud computing, Big Data analytics, “Things,” Web communication, applications, network, storage, etc. It is essentially including everything connected online from hardware to software, or as we like to say, it’s an Internet of many different things. The difference ...
Cloud Expo 2014 TV commercials will feature @ThingsExpo, which was launched in June, 2014 at New York City's Javits Center as the largest 'Internet of Things' event in the world.
SYS-CON Events announced today that Windstream, a leading provider of advanced network and cloud communications, has been named “Silver Sponsor” of SYS-CON's 16th International Cloud Expo®, which will take place on June 9–11, 2015, at the Javits Center in New York, NY. Windstream (Nasdaq: WIN), a FORTUNE 500 and S&P 500 company, is a leading provider of advanced network communications, including cloud computing and managed services, to businesses nationwide. The company also offers broadband, phone and digital TV services to consumers primarily in rural areas.
"There is a natural synchronization between the business models, the IoT is there to support ,” explained Brendan O'Brien, Co-founder and Chief Architect of Aria Systems, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at the 15th International Cloud Expo®, held Nov 4–6, 2014, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
The major cloud platforms defy a simple, side-by-side analysis. Each of the major IaaS public-cloud platforms offers their own unique strengths and functionality. Options for on-site private cloud are diverse as well, and must be designed and deployed while taking existing legacy architecture and infrastructure into account. Then the reality is that most enterprises are embarking on a hybrid cloud strategy and programs. In this Power Panel at 15th Cloud Expo (http://www.CloudComputingExpo.com), moderated by Ashar Baig, Research Director, Cloud, at Gigaom Research, Nate Gordon, Director of T...