| By .NETDJ News Desk | Article Rating: |
|
| May 5, 2008 05:45 PM EDT | Reads: |
11,145 |
May 3, 2008
Mr. Jerry Yang
CEO and Chief Yahoo
Yahoo! Inc.
701 First Avenue
Sunnyvale, CA 94089
Dear Jerry:
After over three months, we have reached the conclusion of the process regarding a possible combination of Microsoft and Yahoo.
I first want to convey my personal thanks to you, your management team, and Yahoo's Board of Directors for your consideration of our proposal. I appreciate the time and attention all of you have given to this matter, and I especially appreciate the time that you have invested personally. I feel that our discussions this week have been particularly useful, providing me for the first time with real clarity on what is and is not possible.
I am disappointed that Yahoo has not moved towards accepting our offer. I first called you with our offer on January 31 because I believed that a combination of our two companies would have created real value for our respective shareholders and would have provided consumers, publishers, and advertisers with greater innovation and choice in the marketplace. Our decision to offer a 62 percent premium at that time reflected the strength of these convictions.
In our conversations this week, we conveyed our willingness to raise our offer to US$33.00 per share, reflecting again our belief in this collective opportunity. This increase would have added approximately another US$5 billion of value to your shareholders, compared to the current value of our initial offer. It also would have reflected a premium of over 70 percent compared to the price at which your stock closed on January 31. Yet it has proven insufficient, as your final position insisted on Microsoft paying yet another US$5 billion or more, or at least another US$4 per share above our US$33.00 offer.
Also, after giving this week's conversations further thought, it is clear to me that it is not sensible for Microsoft to take our offer directly to your shareholders. This approach would necessarily involve a protracted proxy contest and eventually an exchange offer. Our discussions with you have led us to conclude that, in the interim, you would take steps that would make Yahoo! undesirable as an acquisition for Microsoft.
We regard with particular concern your apparent planning to respond to a "hostile" bid by pursuing a new arrangement that would involve or lead to the outsourcing to Google of key paid Internet search terms offered by Yahoo! today. In our view, such an arrangement with the dominant search provider would make an acquisition of Yahoo undesirable to us for a number of reasons:
- First, it would fundamentally undermine Yahoo's own strategy and long-term viability by encouraging advertisers to use Google as opposed to your Panama paid search system. This would also fragment your search advertising and display advertising strategies and the ecosystem surrounding them. This would undermine the reliance on your display advertising business to fuel future growth.
- Given this, it would impair Yahoo's ability to retain the talented engineers working on advertising systems that are important to our interest in a combination of our companies.
- In addition, it would raise a host of regulatory and legal problems that no acquirer, including Microsoft, would want to inherit. Among other things, this would consolidate market share with the already-dominant paid search provider in a manner that would reduce competition and choice in the marketplace.
- This would also effectively enable Google to set the prices for key search terms on both their and your search platforms and, in the process, raise prices charged to advertisers on Yahoo. In addition to whatever resulting legal problems, this seems unwise from a business perspective unless in fact one simply wishes to use this as a vehicle to exit the paid search business in favor of Google.
- It could foreclose any chance of a combination with any other search provider that is not already relying on Google's search services.
We will move forward and will continue to innovate and grow our business at Microsoft with the talented team we have in place and potentially through strategic transactions with other business partners.
I still believe even today that our offer remains the only alternative put forward that provides your stockholders full and fair value for their shares. By failing to reach an agreement with us, you and your stockholders have left significant value on the table.
But clearly a deal is not to be.
Thank you again for the time we have spent together discussing this.
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Steven A. Ballmer
Steven A. Ballmer
Chief Executive Officer
Microsoft Corporation
Published May 5, 2008 Reads 11,145
Copyright © 2008 SYS-CON Media, Inc. — All Rights Reserved.
Syndicated stories and blog feeds, all rights reserved by the author.
- Yahoo! Edges Out Google With Major Mobile Search Win in Europe
- Is Yahoo! Too Large a Company to Force into Microsoft's Ways?
- Yahoo! Plays Google Card
- Microsoft-Yahoo! - Microsoft Threatens To Walk
- Microsoft-Yahoo! - Microsoft Fails To Make Up Its Mind What To Do Next
- Yahoo That Demanded $37 From Microsoft, Sinks to $22.30
- Yahoo Stockholders Don’t Like Jerry Yang THAT Much
- Yahoo To Pair Up with AOL?
- Jerry Yang’s Pants Are Down Around His Ankles
More Stories By .NETDJ News Desk
.NETDJ News Desk monitors Microsoft .NET and its related technologies, including Silverlight, to present IT professionals with news, updates on technology advances, business trends, new products and standards, and insight.
- It's the Java vs. C++ Shootout Revisited!
- Patterns for Building High Performance Applications
- Asynchronous Logging Using Spring
- Java for Programmers (2nd Edition)
- Cross-Platform Mobile Website Development – a Tool Comparison
- Three Buzzwords That Every CIO Hears but One They Should Listen To
- Write Once Run Anywhere or Cross Platform Mobile Development Tools
- Immersing into JavaScript Frameworks
- Workday Reportedly Prepping to Go Public
- Cloud Expo New York: The Java EE 7 Platform - Developing for the Cloud
- Book Review: Sams Teach Yourself Java in 24 Hours
- OpenOffice.com Lives
- Book Excerpt: Introducing HTML5
- Adobe Sends Flex to the Apache Foundation
- Five Years Waiting for JRE 7: Is It Justified? (Part 1)
- Book Excerpt: Java Application Profiling Tips and Tricks
- i-Technology in 2012: Five Industry Predictions
- It's the Java vs. C++ Shootout Revisited!
- Patterns for Building High Performance Applications
- OpenXava 4.3: Rapid Java Web Development
- The Next Web Architecture
- Asynchronous Logging Using Spring
- Java for Programmers (2nd Edition)
- Is Write Once Run Anywhere Ever Going to Be a Reality?
- A Cup of AJAX? Nay, Just Regular Java Please
- Java Developer's Journal Exclusive: 2006 "JDJ Editors' Choice" Awards
- JavaServer Faces (JSF) vs Struts
- The i-Technology Right Stuff
- Rich Internet Applications with Adobe Flex 2 and Java
- Java vs C++ "Shootout" Revisited
- Bean-Managed Persistence Using a Proxy List
- Reporting Made Easy with JasperReports and Hibernate
- Creating a Pet Store Application with JavaServer Faces, Spring, and Hibernate
- Why Do 'Cool Kids' Choose Ruby or PHP to Build Websites Instead of Java?
- What's New in Eclipse?
- i-Technology Predictions for 2007: Where's It All Headed?


















