YOUR FEEDBACK
Three RIA Platforms Compared: Adobe Flex, Google Web Toolkit, and OpenLaszlo
NN wrote: Yeah you are right GWT is poor man's Flex. After using GWT on two...


2007 West
GOLD SPONSORS:
Active Endpoints
Your SOA Needs BPEL for Orchestration
BEA
Virtualized SOA: Adaptive Infrastructure for Demanding Applications
Nexaweb
Overcoming Bandwidth Challenges with Nexaweb
TIBCO
What is Service Virtualization?
SILVER SPONSORS:
WSO2
Using Web Services Technologies and FOSS Solutions
Click For 2007 East
Event Webcasts

2008 East
PLATINUM SPONSORS:
Appcelerator
Think Fast: Accelerate AJAX Development with Appcelerator
GOLD SPONSORS:
DreamFace Interactive
The Ultimate Framework for Creating Personalized Web 2.0 Mashups
ICEsoft
AJAX and Social Computing for the Enterprise
Kaazing
Enterprise Comet: Real–Time, Real–Time, or Real–Time Web 2.0?
Nexaweb
Now Playing: Desktop Apps in the Browser!
Sun
jMaki as an AJAX Mashup Framework
POWER PANELS:
The Business Value
of RIAs
What Lies Beyond AJAX?
KEYNOTES:
Douglas Crockford
Can We Fix the Web?
Anthony Franco
2008: The Year of the RIA
Click For 2007 Event Webcasts
SYS-CON.TV
TOP THREE LINKS YOU MUST CLICK ON


Flashback to '04: Gosling Says "Open-Sourcing Java Could Promote Interoperability"
Disparate Groups Would Find It Easiet to Align Behind One Code Base

Digg This!

"There's been a lot of churn lately over open letters from IBM and others calling for Sun to open source Java," wrote James Gosling last week in his java.net blog

"Rather than try to respond to everyone individually, I'll try to respond to a pile of questions here," he continues.

Specifically, he responds to five:


1. "Some have asked why IBM is sending open letters, rather than talking to us directly: asking if this isn't rather kindergarten-ish."

Gosling's answer: Well, yes: it does appear that way.

 

2. "Some have asked what IBM would get if Java were open-sourced: doesn't IBM already have the source?"

Gosling's answer: Again yes, they do have the source. It's also true that anyone can get the source. The major restriction is that if folks want to redistrubute their changes, they have to pass the test suite. Which means that about the only thing that they could get from liberalization is to be able to skip testing.


3. "Some of IBM's statements have essentially distilled down to 'we'd love to help: open-source Java so that we can.' This has led to questions about whether or not IBM has been able to help."

Gosling's answer: The answer is that they have. They're one of the strongest participants in the Java Community Process. Their participation over the years has been substantial, and we're very thankful for it. For example, IBM was the major mover that led to the creation of the Swing API to replace the AWT api. They contributed many engineers to the Swing team. Viewing that time in hindsight, it is more than slightly ironic that these days they're endorsing SWT, which is essentially a clone of the AWT architecture, which they had strongly condemmed back when the decision to create Swing was being debated.



4. "Some have asked when, given IBM's apparent zeal for open source, DB2 and WebSpere will be open sourced?"

Gosling's answer: Ask them, not me - it does seem unlikely.



5. "Most of the comments I've heard from folks about open sourcing Java have been negative."

Gosling's answer: Hmmm... Not so much negative as concerned: Developers value Java's cross platform interoperability and reliability. They're afraid that if Java is open-sourced then someone will try to fragment the community by creating incompatible versions of Java and ignore the community process, just like Microsoft did. Microsoft did a lot of damage to the community and many developers strongly do not want that to happen again.


Gosling leaves the Java community in no doubt of how seriously Sun is taking this whole discussion.

"This is a big issue for us," he writes. "If [his emphasis] we do something to make Java even more open-source than it is already, having safeguards to protect the developer community will be something we pay a lot of attention to."

"Carefully done," Gosling concludes, in a tantalizing final sentence, "open-sourcing could actually promote interoperability by making it easier for disparate groups to align behind one code base."

About Jeremy Geelan
Jeremy Geelan is Sr. Vice-President of SYS-CON Media & Events. He is Conference Chair of the AJAXWorld Conference & Expo series, of the 3rd International Virtualization Conference & Expo and founder of Web 2.0 Journal, AJAXWorld Magazine and other major SYS-CON titles. From 2000-6, as first editorial director and then group publisher of SYS-CON Media, he was responsible for the development of all new titles and i-Technology portals for the firm, and regularly represents SYS-CON at conferences and trade shows, speaking to technology audiences both in North America and overseas. He is executive producer and presenter of "Power Panels with Jeremy Geelan" on SYS-CON.TV.

TinyAcorns-MightyOaks wrote: JAG is the Java authority within Sun, perhaps THE Java authority anywhere on earth. But what do the others behind the Oak Project all those years ago think about the open-sourcing of Java: has anyone asked Arthur Van Hoff or Andy Bechtolsheim?
read & respond »
JavaDan3 wrote: Isn't Gosling in Tokyo? Or South Africa? Or in Outer Space (Java runs the Mars Explorer)? How can he be joining this debate? Is he, like Java, now everywhere? "Gosling Everwhere" - I like it.
read & respond »
Peter van der Linden wrote: OK, thanks for the reasons why people would like Java GPL''d. That first one about "not being able to ship with Linux" would be a serious problem, if it were accurate. However, as Nathar showed, 2 big distros currently ship Java without problems. As another example, Lindows shows how Linux can ship without 100% gpl''d code. The second point about Sun squashing new stuff puzzles me. What is wrong with the Java Community Process? Of course Sun is going to safeguard Java from ideas that will spoil it, such as destroying the ability to run on all architectures. However, compiling Swing (or any part of the run-time) to native seems like a pretty good idea to me. That can be done regardless of whether or not Java is GPL''d. After all, you have all the source. Looking at the code taints you? ...
read & respond »
Nathar Leichoz wrote: [i] Problems solved by the GPL (as such) a) Java can''''t be distributed as part of a Linux distribution unless it''''s bundled with every application that uses it. Also it would be illegal to distribute GCC in this circumstance. [/i] Redhat ships Java http://www.redhat.com/sof tware/rhel/features/ Slackware ships Java http://www.slackware.com/ pb/?vers=slackware-9.1&se t=d
read & respond »
read & respond »
Andrew Shuttlewood wrote: Problems solved by the GPL (as such) a) Java can''t be distributed as part of a Linux distribution unless it''s bundled with every application that uses it. Also it would be illegal to distribute GCC in this circumstance. b) Sun can squash attempts to do new and interesting stuff with Java, such as ahead of time compilation (note how you can''t compile swing using java to native code, even off companies that OWN a license) c) You can''t redistribute what there is in the source. Even looking at it taints you from developing similar code. People don''t want to hack on the Java standard API because it''s under so many layers of restrictions, it''s certainly not open source in any means - it is purely source available. If Sun want to do ''something'' that would be good, then they could open sourc...
read & respond »
Jason Bell wrote: Alan Williamson, Jason Briggs and myself had this very same discussion during October/November 2002. It can be only summed up by the following link: http://www.n-ary.com/java /cartoons.cfm?ID=18 (I''m the one in the orange top :)) Regards Jason Bell
read & respond »
akme wrote: Sun and IBM are just acting according to their organizational character. While they both promote innovation, Sun promotes its individual leaders while IBM promotes its collective action (creative, committee-forming Borg). While Java is open-source the JDK/API standards and management thereof are in Sun''s control, and that''s where IBM would like more of a partner role on equal footing for management of the API. Management by committee is always slower than by a single leader but running JCP has already opened that issue. The statement about "increasing marketplace acceptance of Java" is ridiculous -- Java is already the standard choice for most non-MS development unless you need the power of C/Objective-C/C++ or you find value in other langusges such as Python. While Java was invented by people at Su...
read & respond »
Peter van der Linden wrote: There''s a lot of sound and fury around this issue. But no one has yet given a convincing answer to the question "what problem is solved by putting Java under the GPL?" So, what problem would that solve? Every Java compiler kit already comes with the complete source code for the run-time library, so you can fix all the bugs you want. So what''s stopping you? I don''t understand the suggestion that open-sourcing Java would be somehow a "response to Mono". What specifically would happen, that cannot happen today? The Mono project is doomed. Either it fizzles out on its own like most open source projects, or it becomes wildly successful and Microsoft kills it either by enforcing its patents or by bribing the developement team to join Microsoft (as they did with Borland and Anders Heljberg)....
read & respond »
jshore wrote: Sun doesn''t get it. Neither do the most vocal open source advocates. The main reason why Java needs to be open sourced is not about "freedom", but rather that the community at large finally has the ability to move Java along: fix problems and make it competitive with the .NET platform environment. Java has largely stagnated as a language and an environment: - fundamental libraries a mess - java plugin / applet ceded market dominance to flash - UI implementation buggy and backward It took the .NET threat for Sun to get off their butt. Still, the environment. Fact is, Java is a losing proposition in Sun''s hands. They''ve shown over the years that they are poor caretakers.
read & respond »
PCM2 wrote: I think -- and I''m really serious -- Sun should probably be looking at open sourcing Java as a response to Mono, if for no other reason. Miguel and Ximian took a look at Java and decided it didn''t suit their needs, as far as developing rich desktop applications for Linux (e.g. Evolution). So rather than use Java, they decided it was actually better to implement the .Net environment themselves, from scratch. To me, that sounds like a fairly heavy indictment, and one that Sun should be looking into, if they''re smart. Now you''ve got Mono humming right along, with the developers busy implementing two distinct stacks: One that''s a Microsoft compatibility layer, for using all the stuff you might have written with Visual Studio, and another that''s more Linux-oriented, with GNOME and GTK bindings, Linux p...
read & respond »
The Java Trap wrote: Gosling also says "even more open-source than it is already"... but Java isn''t open source at all according to RMS
read & respond »
spellraiser wrote: Question from the article: 2. "Some have asked what IBM would get if Java were open-sourced: doesn''t IBM already have the source?" Gosling''s answer: Again yes, they do have the source. It''s also true that anyone can get the source. The major restriction is that if folks want to redistrubute their changes, they have to pass the test suite. Which means that about the only thing that they could get from liberalization is to be able to skip testing. So it doesn''t seem to be such a big issue after all. The source is already available, and all that is required to change it and redistribute it is to pass a standard suite of tests. Now, call me crazy, but I think that''s not A Bad Thing. This restriction is what helps Java to be uniform and platform-independent. The be...
read & respond »
WorthNoting wrote: Gosling is the one who produced the first non-free version of emacs, which was a direct motivation for RMS to produce the GPL! He also produced NeWS which was superior to X in almost every way... except... it wasn''t open either! I''ve always thought that Java will become open source over Gosling''s cold dead body, but maybe he''ll prove me wrong.
read & respond »
Actually wrote: By definition Gosling is not the father of Java. He was (and still is) a Sun employee and developed Java during that time, by today standards any product developed by an employee is property of the company, so even McNealy is the father, McNealy is just the obnoxious uncle that says weird things when is drunk. Gosling was just a surrogate father. BTW what happened to the other people around OAK project?, did sun killed all of them and throwed them into a ditch?.
read & respond »
NZHeretic wrote: As I said over at Slashdot it would benefit the entire Java based industy, including the free software, open source and proprietary based vendors, to open license the core J2ME,J2SE,J2EE libraries and Java to bytecode compilers. Java''s primary strength, the ability to write code which is constantly portable across many vendors platforms, would be greatly enhanced if all of vendors were using the same core libraries. To insure that the standard base core would not become polluted with incompatable forks, the source could be licensed with a clause requiring any incompatable changes or any additional classes or methords to be moved to and occupy only the vendors namespace. Another clause would require that the vendor version of Java bytecode compiler and any GUI IDE defaults to generating portable bytecod...
read & respond »
Quezztion wrote: How will opening Java help Sun make more money?
read & respond »
java/jvm wrote: I don''t think everyone understands java. Port the thing lately, and I think you will understand. A bit more input from the "community" needs to help evolve the black box. It doesn''t matter at that point if it''s sun, or the community. What does matter, is Sun has put a lot of resources into Java. Get involved, port the thing, then give input.
read & respond »
Chris Hubick wrote: I am still waiting for Mr. Goslings comments to reflect some insight as to why thousands and thousands of developers believe in many of the ideals behind the Free Software Foundation. He either doesn''t understand /why/ Sun is being pushed - or just doesn''t want to tackle any philosophical or pragmatic issues of Freedom.
read & respond »
goslingsamoron wrote: How ironic... all his carefully chosen questions and answers seem to be nothing more than "kindergarten-ish" indirect attacks on IBM.
read & respond »
LATEST JAVA STORIES & POSTS
Virtualization Journal Attracts JavaOne Attendees to SYS-CON Media Booth
Virtualization Journal now reaches more than 60,000 online readers with monthly digital editions and weekly newsletters. The premier issue of the magazine's print edition, which debuts on May 6, 2008, at JavaOne in San Francisco, as a media sponsor of this event, will be availabl
Real-Time Kaazing Solution and Sun's Glassfish Forge RIA Alliance
Kaazing Corporation and Sun Microsystems announced an alliance to deliver the scalable and advanced real-time Web 2.0 platform. The integration between Kaazing's real-time Rich Internet Application (RIA) solution, Enterprise Comet, and Sun Microsystems' open source Java EE applic
Sun Challenges Linux
Sun's mule train has finally pulled into Indiana after three years on the road. Indiana is the Linux-friendly Fedora-like OpenSolaris project meant to move the Solaris-shy Linux community off Linux and on to Solaris tempted by Solaris widgetry like the highly scalable, rollback-e
AJAX World - Sun Talks Up its Late-to-the-Party AIR-Silverlight Rival
At Java One this week Sun has been selling its year -old-but-still-upcoming - and definitely late-to-the-party - Adobe AIR- and Microsoft Silverlight-competitive JavaFX Rich Client environment as a potential revenue-generator capable of putting ads on mobile applications and JavaF
MySQL Backs Off Closed Source Plan
MySQL has backed off a plan to charge for some encryption and compression backup widgetry in the next version of the database - and, heavens, NOT OPEN SOURCE THE STUFF, an idea it trotted a few weeks ago and predictably caught hell for. Sun, which bought MySQL for a billion dolla
JavaOne Archives - Dvorak Comments on AMD Intel Lawsuit on SYS-CON.TV
Conference in San Francisco. Dvorak held forth on a number of topics, including the new AMD/Intel lawsuit, the viability of Java and Sun, the value of (or lack thereof) of corporate PR, and whether or not a new book about Silicon Valley is really worth reading.
SUBSCRIBE TO THE WORLD'S MOST POWERFUL NEWSLETTERS
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR RSS FEEDS & GET YOUR SYS-CON NEWS LIVE!
Click to Add our RSS Feeds to the Service of Your Choice:
Google Reader or Homepage Add to My Yahoo! Subscribe with Bloglines Subscribe in NewsGator Online
myFeedster Add to My AOL Subscribe in Rojo Add 'Hugg' to Newsburst from CNET News.com Kinja Digest View Additional SYS-CON Feeds
Publish Your Article! Please send it to editorial(at)sys-con.com!

Advertise on this site! Contact advertising(at)sys-con.com! 201 802-3021

SYS-CON FEATURED WHITEPAPERS

ADS BY GOOGLE
BREAKING JAVA NEWS
Day Software to Present at Henry Stewart DAM Show
Day Software (SWX:DAYN) (OTCQX:DYIHY), a leading provider of global content management